In!
... and without knowing much about Falun Gong, I’m inclined to like them, too, based on our common DS enemy. More digging needed, but so far, I see nothing that FG has done that’s inconsistent with truth and freedom.
I’ve been thinking about what might happen next in the plan. Instead of focusing on what has just happened and what might follow from that, I’ve been thinking about what the end goals might be and what might need to be done in order to achieve them.
Most of what I expect the goals of the Trump/Q plan to be are things we’ve discussed here. But there is one big thing that we haven’t.
The big thing: a plan to deal with the legal fallout from all the truth bombs.
Some examples:
1. If it turns out that JE was trafficking children from countries X, Y, and Z, I expect there might be lawsuits from those countries. Who would they sue? Who would the plaintiffs be? Same for other persons as yet unindicted.
2. If it turns out that the intelligence agency of country X was behind crimes against country Y, how will that be handled? IMO, the citizens of country X who had no knowledge of those crimes should not be held accountable for the evil of a few at the top.
Think about this if the USA is country X. As a taxpayer, do you feel you should be held financially responsible for things that the derps in our country did?
Now put the shoe on the other foot. If the derps in some other country were behind a terrorist act in the US which caused loss of life or financial damage, do you think the citizens of that country should have to pay for it? All the $trillions we’ve spent fighting wars. The loss of life to terror acts, the loss of life in the course of fighting wars.
I think there will need to be some sort of “reset” on an international scale to deal with these questions. So far, I haven’t seen any obvious signs of such a reset. But perhaps a lot of the international negotiations going on now are related to that.
IMO it will be important to recognize that the innocents in all countries have suffered and that to embroil the world in some sort of Nuremberg trials against countries rather than against individuals would be chaos.
3. Who are our allies? If we’ve been betrayed by “allies”, how do we reset that situation. I expect that all of the 5Eye nations are guilty of crimes against us. But not their citizens. I feel no ill will toward Canadians, NZ, Aussies, Brits - only against the individuals in those countries who committed crimes.
4. What do we do with the massive wealth of those who turn out to be derps? For example, if it turns out that Queen Elizabeth (and not just Andrew) is guilty of massive crimes against humanity, and her immense wealth is confiscated, who gets it? There will be a feeding frenzy of people claiming damages. How do we deal with that? Same for Soros, Gates, and others who may turn out to be derps.
5. Same question as #4, but with corporations. How do you protect innocent shareholders without destroying a corporation? How do you protect workers without destroying a corporation? How do you protect the availability of products and services that people still want or need?
With most of these, in addition to legal chaos, there is a great risk of financial chaos, not the least of which would be caused by people who stop working because they think they are going to get rich from “reparations”. Many other financial factors as well.
6. Where do we put the guilty? This is similar to the question of what to do with all the illegal aliens in our country.
7. How do we deal with people who were “forced” to commit crimes? People whose families were threatened, etc?
8. How do we deal with people who were victims and then after years of victimization became perps? Is there a cutoff age? If a 14 year-old were involved in torturing others after being subjected to years of torture him/herself, would you treat him/her as an adult? Would you treat him/her the same as someone who had never been tortured? (I would not.)
9. How do you dismantle the surveillance state? Worldwide. How do you guarantee privacy to US citizens? Even if there were no FB/GOOG/NSA etc in this country, that would not secure our privacy from other countries.
Probably more. But those are the examples that occur to me. Thinking about these questions, I’m inclined to believe we have a LONG road ahead of us. I’m not discouraged. I’m optimistic. I’d like to see some signs that Q/Trump is working on these things or maybe has already addressed them. I doubt they’ve been overlooked.