Skip to comments.Jeffrey Epstein's best friend gives bizarre interview calling the billionaire pedophile's ...
Posted on 08/24/2019 2:13:38 PM PDT by RummyChick
An art collector and scientist claiming to be Jeffrey Epstein's best friend for decades referred to the pedophile's underage victims as 'trollops' who were complicit and claimed he had a mental disorder which made him crave sex.
Stuart Pivar, 89, an industrialist based in New York, spoke in a wide-ranging and rambling interview about his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein until he claimed he cut contact when he started to 'notice certain things' about his behavior.
Epstein, 66, killed himself August 10 in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan while awaiting trial next year on federal sex-trafficking charges. Numerous women in the United States have claimed they were sexually abused by Epstein.
Pivar helped establish the New York Academy of Art alongside Andy Warhol and Epstein would later serve on the academy's board.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Ive read FReeper comments calling the teen girls whores as well.
Kids dont have the capacity to morally decide to prostitution themselves. Thats why we call them ...minors.
As for adult women? Yes, Trollops.
To call a sexually exploited minor a whore is beyond disgusting and it is happening in the most conservative of circles.
claimed he had a mental disorder which made him crave sex...
I do too!!
It’s called being a male.
The disorder part is craving it with a KID or forcing it on someone.
And then there’s Macron Disorder.
Not immoral but odd, to say the least.
I’ve missed those or I would have thrown up.
“underage victims as ‘trollops’ who were complicit”
Sure. Teens making extra money off of creepy old man.
Yeah, but beside the point. Still just as illegal.
And not true in all cases I would also assume,
Interesting interview. The old guy is obsessed with nymphomania and nymphomaniacs. He repeatedly tells the interviewer that Epstein suffered satyriasis. “Do you know what that is? It’s like nymphomania, but for men. Do you know what nymphomania is?”
I understand the discomfort. But, post pubescent 14-17 year old females are “illegal” only because, as the term indicates, some lawmakers decided to make them illegal at that age. If these women are voluntarily accepting money for sex, then they are what they are.
“Kids dont have the capacity to morally decide to prostitution themselves.”
I don’t think that’s true at all. Teens are able to make moral distinctions.
And a magic minute between 17 and 365 days and the next day that brings on moral clarity from ignorance doesn’t exist.
Nonetheless, it is all illegal and does not exonerate or temper crimes of this nature by Epstein or anyone.
Even if the teen were ready willing and able and 100% on board, it is still illegal and not relevant.
Best friends, 23 year age gap.
What hobbies and interests did they have in common?
No comparison between promiscuous 16 year old females engaging in heterosexual activity and faggets but raping 10 year old boys...
“post pubescent 14-17 year old females are illegal only because, as the term indicates, some lawmakers decided to make them illegal at that age”
I don’t think it is just “some lawmakers”. I think it reflects societal norms and values of this time.
We live in a strange age.
Sex between minors and adults is strongly discouraged and illegal. Which is of course good.
But sex among these same minors is encouraged and taught in schools and throughout society.
Around the world the age of consent varies, and is as low as 11. Japan is 13 and Germany 14.
Youre right but there are also a couple of side facts to this whole mess
Some of the girls have consistently lauded Epstein and refused to go against him well into their 30s now
Some have switched sides from bashing Epstein to recanting
Some have per other participants been less than completely truthful
I have no doubt Epstein was guilty legally of underaged girls and he and Miss Maxwell recruited them and I am starting to believe if Epstein and the triple play with 12 year olds is true was a bona fide legally and clinically defined pedophile
Id like to see where this leads and to whom but just like the soft coup we wont
So called wise minds will determine exposure is too hard for western governments to bear politically ...sadly
But on girls....Im ambivalent honestly on some of the 17-18 year olds and for sure the older ones
I grew up early 70s when things really went crazy with Dazed and Confused culture
I saw plenty high school girls who adored being available to older men
They reveled in it.....and taunted those boys their own age with it
Men with means in their 40s with a 17 year old which was legal then...I think it still is...16 is age of consent my home state
Its like #metoo.....I promise you nearly all those women signing on now for pubilicity and victimhood had no truck back then with shagging someone for a plum role
I know Freepers hate nuance but please read my entire post before firing off about Epstein so I dont have to be redundant
For the record I dont call any woman WHORE....its cruel
Not even if they are paid directly for sex and I always treated temporary company same as I woulda my prom date whose parents went to church with mine
Women know when youre kind and respectful in dim lights
I have heard the same story from a retired SS official. These girls were willing participants in his debauchery.
Where in the heck are the parents of these girls? It’s as if they have no parents. And were there any young boys involved?
Seems this has been going on for a long time and the feds knew it all along yet kept this going.
There was a story that came out yesterday about the sheer horrors that Judy Garland went through.
I suspect some of it were things she put up with for fame as was common at the time.
She is still a victim.
Epstein, 66, killed himself [with assistance].
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.