Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Short answer: Yes

Even the liberal 'fact checkers' admit that H.R. 5717 would ban the possession of so-called assault rifles.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/06/fact-check-would-us-house-bill-ban-assault-weapons/2943913001/

1 posted on 04/07/2020 10:43:52 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

2 posted on 04/07/2020 10:44:20 AM PDT by PROCON (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Short answer: No

It would never get past the senate and president.
And even if it did, it would never get past the Scotus.

The house is the weakest of the bunch for a reason. It’s where pretty much anybody can get in. Exhibit one: AOC


4 posted on 04/07/2020 10:48:53 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

You have not noticed the shift from assault weapons to weapons of war? Yes a mosin nagant is a weapon of war.


12 posted on 04/07/2020 11:13:26 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

So how would they enforce something so unconstitutional seeing as there are more than one gun per resident of the country and most of the trained gun owners are skilled veterans?


14 posted on 04/07/2020 11:25:52 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

If they ever get a permanent ban on “assault rifles” they will be back for their original target, HANDGUNS.

The DEMOCRAT lies we have been told over the years...

1962 We ONLY want to register handguns. Rifles will not be affected!
1964, We ONLY want to register ALL firearms, not ban them.

1968 We ONLY want to register all guns, and ban the import of foreign Saturday Night Specials, and 5-shot bolt action army surplus rifles! (they got the ban).

1970, We ONLY want to ban small American handguns. Rifles will not be affected!
1976 We ONLY want to ban ALL handguns! Rifles will not be affected!
1981, Actress Lee Grant on GMA screams...”THE NRA IS A RIFLE ORGANIZATION! THEY SHOULD GIVE UP THEIR HANDGUNS AND THEY CAN KEEP THEIR RIFLES!”

1984, they made a grab for the rifles, and missed, but played their hand.
1988,Josh Sugarmann, of the National Council to Ban Handguns tells how to ban rifles.

“Assault weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over
fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons
—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine
gun— can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on
these weapons.”
– Josh Sugarmann
Gun owners now know that any time we negotiate with those who want to ban guns, we are up against a stacked deck.


15 posted on 04/07/2020 11:27:08 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Let’s. It would be a big, “So what?” The worst thing that could happen to the Rats is they might actually succeed. None of them actually wants that.


16 posted on 04/07/2020 11:27:56 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

So on January 30, the tipping point for COVID19 legislation, Democrats were ... trying to ban guns.


18 posted on 04/07/2020 11:30:56 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Well, considering the bulk of the bill addresses the section entitled “TITLE V—ASSAULT WEAPONS AND FIREARMS SILENCERS AND MUFFLERS BAN”, yes.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text#toc-HFEFA19D6404C4966A5E7D800788D5BAF

There is a grandfathering exemption. They know better than to actually criminalize what’s already owned. The goal is attrition.


20 posted on 04/07/2020 11:45:48 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Pass whatever laws you like......I will NOT comply.


24 posted on 04/07/2020 11:56:38 AM PDT by Envisioning (Carry safe, always carry, everyday, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

When the assault on the Second Amendment reaches a tipping point, and I believe it will eventually, I wonder if a Governor of a state with a patriotic majority might formally declare a well regulated militia consisting of all vote eligible citizens with clean backgrounds. Restrictions on firearm ownership would seem to be moot in that case. Just musing...


25 posted on 04/07/2020 12:12:54 PM PDT by PerConPat (A politician is an animal that can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground--Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
It would also necessitate all firearm owners to obtain a federal firearms owner’s license,

How would DemocRats feel if journalists had to obtain a federal license to write articles and then receive permission from the government EVERY time they wanted to publish something?

26 posted on 04/07/2020 12:16:02 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A socalist is someone that wants everything you have except your job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
"Would a U.S. House bill ban assault weapons?"

There is no place in the USA where an assemblage of 218 imbeciles willing to vote for the stupidest, most un-Constitutional garbage imaginable can be collected -- other than the Democrat side of the US House of Representatives. Cases in point:

        

In a word, YES!

28 posted on 04/07/2020 12:25:56 PM PDT by TXnMA (Anagram: "PANDEMIC --> DEM PANIC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
Q. Would Alabamians comply?

A. (FACT CHECKED) No, they would not.

Come and take them.

31 posted on 04/07/2020 2:09:42 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

Democrats are simply a group of horrible people.

JoMa


32 posted on 04/07/2020 2:39:46 PM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON

NO, fact, any Bill has to pass both houses and signed by the President in order to become Law. This is DOA in Senate and by Trump.


33 posted on 04/07/2020 2:52:39 PM PDT by The Mayor (I am outraged at your outrage toward the outrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson