Posted on 04/07/2020 6:41:39 PM PDT by Fido969
Fauci: ".. a safe and effective vaccine is needed to end the global AIDS pandemic expeditiously and sustainably,"
(Excerpt) Read more at iavi.org ...
Result? NADA.
From 2009:
Last year, he presided over a US$4.4 billion budget—roughly a third of it dedicated to HIV/AIDS research.
Source: https://www.iavireport.org/vol-13-no-2-mar-apr-2009/1031-a-living-history-of-aids-vaccine-research-part1-anthony-fauci
Excuse me, my head is about to explode.
HIV spread could be eliminated promptly if drug addicts didn’t share needles and homosexuals stopped sodomizing each other. Nothing else is needed.
When AIDS started I remember an article in Scientific American saying that it would become an epidemic and that the heterosexual community would not be spared. Didn’t happen.
But Fauci, who spent BILLIONS and decades looking for a vaccine for AIDS wasn’t able to do so - and now he says society will only be safe if we have a vaccine against coronavirus.
The guy has spent his life tilting at windmills, and he doesn’t care if he destroys the country with this last bout.
Talks nice, but no result.
Was always true and Will never happen
Rush covered this today. Fauci is a liberal idiot, but aren’t all liberals idiots?
Liberal Idiot is redundant.
Or, a huge behavior change in a “community” with whom a high % of HIV is present. That is not very likely to happen.
HIV spread could be eliminated promptly if drug addicts didn’t share needles and homosexuals stopped sodomizing each other. Nothing else is needed.
Your 100% correct!
I think this guy is on the way out. After this thing is over, out he goes along with the horse he rode in on.
social distancing?
At 79 he needs to spend more time with his family...
https://www.wthr.com/article/verify-comparison-covid-19-totals-common-causes-deaths-leaves-out-context
Amazing how we didn't quarantine or prohibit those behaviors.
The Left continues to advance both of these.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nih-official-fauci-hiv-vaccine/
His reasoning for terminating a clinical trial:
No efficacy at all, because it wasn't done in a large enough trial or among at-risk people, who would allow enough infection to occur to see if it would work. All it showed was safety to some degree—I mean, we didn't do a lot patients—but safety in those we looked at. And the fact that it induces an immune response, which one would argue was somewhat better than what you saw in the STEP trial.
There was some argument about that at several meetings. "Somewhat better" is what? A lot better? I didn't think it was a lot better.
If there were no other promising avenues - why would he terminate clinical trials? The possibility of "a little better" has no value to him? It just seems bizarre.
Follow the money.
He’s a Big Pharma recipient. They fund some of his labs.
Another swamper. No Surprise.
Big Pharma Front Man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AHNoLhLPpI
Posted earlier if ya missed it, long but interesting
Q: To your decision to reject this vaccine trial, there must have been some point where, in smaller trials, the PAVE vaccine proved to be safe and at least somewhat effective. It would have had to in order to get to a large trial, right?
Fauci: "No efficacy at all, because it wasn't done in a large enough trial or among at-risk people, who would allow enough infection to occur to see if it would work"
I can't stand it. He rejects a larger trial of the drug... because it hasn't shown itself useful in a large trial.
12 years later - This guy is talking about potential COVID treatments the same way!
I don’t know. I don’t trust this Dr. Fauci.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.