Health Freedom Litigators
Greg Glaser & Ray Flores
Posted on 04/10/2021 2:01:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
Update April 8, 2021
Case Overview
On February 22, 2021 we appeared in Federal Court to request a court order (1) recognizing the role of vaccines in the national health epidemic, (2) upholding that control group studies of vaccinated v. unvaccinated are scientifically advantageous, and (3) exempting all persons from mandatory vaccination.
Click the images below to view our court documents, proving for example that unvaccinated adults enjoy 1,248% better health than vaccinated. And unvaccinated children enjoy 1,099% better health than vaccinated.
Click here to read our Verified Court Petition. The next step in our case is an appeal with the 9th Circuit.
Summary Report, Full Report, National Security Report.
Our Case Documents
Click the image to view our many graphs proving the unvaccinated control group is exponentially healthier than the vaccinated.
Click the image for our informational graphic (a demonstrative evidence exhibit) featuring some highlights from our Request for Judicial Notice #1 (“Health Crisis in America”).
Click the image for our informational graphic (a demonstrative evidence exhibit) featuring some highlights from our Request for Judicial Notice #3 (“Vaccines Are Made In Communist China”).
Click the image for our many graphs showing that
the national decline in mortality occurred before vaccination.
Click the image to read our Request for Judicial Notice #1 covering the national health pandemic and its connection to the immune system.
All Court Documents Filed
A. First Amended Verified Petition (filed January 25, 2021)
B. Request for Judicial Notice (Filings December 2020)
C. Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filings December 2020)
D. Government’s Opposition Papers (Filings February 2021)
E. Petitioner’s Response Papers (Filings February 2021)
F. Dismissal
Petitioner Joy Garner’s Survey Reports (Filings January 2021)
2-22-21 Court Hearing Update
Overview: The lower court refused to allow the case to proceed to an evidentiary stage definitively proving vaccines are decimating the American population. The DOJ’s strongest argument they could muster is that the scientific evidence proving the American population is being decimated by vaccines would embarrass the political elite in Washington DC. Here is the DOJ’s exact quote, “any suggestion from a court that vaccines are not safe would cause ’embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.'” Opposition Brief, page 16, line 11.
Detail: In February the court dismissed our case on the grounds of standing (i.e., saying we can’t sue the President for the constitutional violations alleged, but rather should sue someone else). We are appealing immediately to the 9th Circuit.
The President, as chief executive, manages multiple departments handling vaccines and their distribution (such as HHS, US Military, Department of Education, Department of Commerce, Department of Justice). He is the ultimate wrongdoer with respect to the plaintiffs. Indeed, the President is the only party that can issue the nationwide order we’re requesting for national security to save America from the chronic illness trajectory. The numbers contained in our filings conclusively show vaccines are destroying our country. The President ultimately bears responsibility; there’s just no nice way to put that.
Surprisingly, the court dismissed our entire case without the government ever producing a single expert or any evidence whatsoever. The defense simply argued that the President cannot be held responsible for vaccine mandates by States. We strongly disagree, because the President is vigorously involved in mandates. The evidence shows the President manages the following across multiple departments:
This sounds very similar to the way SCOTUS refused to deal with President Trump's election fraud claims. Instead of hearing the claim, and potentially opening a can of very interesting worms, the court chickened out and just said, "You have no standing." What a buncha BS!
Standing is a fundamental requirement of Article III.
Courts were never intended to give advisory opinions.
Here’s that thread resource I told you about. Check out the charts/graphs which compare unvaxxed population to vaxxed, particularly over time.
Or vaxxed and change in health starting 1990s.
:D
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3949520/posts
Thanks!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.