Posted on 07/27/2021 3:48:23 AM PDT by EBH
Senator Rand Paul
Jul 24 I joined Ingraham to discuss the latest on NIH funding Gain of Function research.
At the 3:15 mark until the end is an interesting conversation regarding the Delta variant. Rand Paul states: the delta variant is real, but the good news is it is much less deadly. Maybe about a tenth as deadly from the last year...
Seeds of truth?
I think they’ll say anything to get you vaccinated. We know, and even the CDC has said it, that it is less virulent but spreads faster. Sounds like a good case for Herd Immunity.
My understanding of the Delta variant is that it is much easier to transmit but is much less virulent than the original.
Vaccination should not be a partisan issue. It hurts the Republican brand that many conservatives embraced the anti-vaxxer movement, which is lunatic fringe rooted in bunko faith healers and the like.
Remember that Trump got us the vaccines, not Biden.
As for Fauci protecting a ChiCom laboratory where the breakout occured, he needs to be held accountable.
Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission. That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.
The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs. See 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(c)(3)
Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted intoe the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.
No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug. The jab is not a living or biological system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.
Good luck trying to talk to anti-vaxxers. These are the ding-dongs that trust a talking head on TV who doesn’t even have a graduate degree over experts with PhDs who’ve spent years studying these things.
As soon as I hear “it’s an experimental ....” I know I’m dealing with a nutter. Or a Chicom agent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.