the FDA is supposed to assure accurate labeling for safety.
why would they push AGAINST safety, accurate labeling and science??
who is allowing/paying the CDC and FDA to murder Americans
by their systematic lying, now KNOWINGLY made??
Posted on 07/30/2021 5:24:06 AM PDT by Meah
On May 19 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a dangerous and totally inappropriate guidance advising against COVID-19 antibody testing pre- or post-vaccination.
This FDA guidance is dangerous because it discourages and blocks most American physicians from using a gold standard assay for immunity to COVID-19.
But, it is of paramount importance for every American citizen and resident and his/her physician to be able to assess the status of one’s immunity to COVID-19 during this pandemic for two reasons.
First, if a person is found to have no COVID-19 antibodies prior to vaccination, that person will know that he/she is at high risk of developing an infection. In other words, antibody testing would allow determination of medical necessity of COVID-19 vaccination — and being that most persons act rationally given correct information, it is anticipated that most non-immune Americans will seek vaccination when confronted with a negative test.
(Excerpt) Read more at childrenshealthdefense.org ...
the FDA is supposed to assure accurate labeling for safety.
why would they push AGAINST safety, accurate labeling and science??
who is allowing/paying the CDC and FDA to murder Americans
by their systematic lying, now KNOWINGLY made??
How do you know if you are actually immune to any form of COVID-19 Wuhan virus, if there is no testing for antibodies?
They might as well be poking you with a rusty nail, otherwise.
This is a no brainer!!!
I guess I should say testing is a no brainer.
This FDA guidance is dangerous because it discourages and blocks most American physicians from using a gold standard assay for immunity to COVID-19.
—
Well there are gold standards and there are gold standards. Perhaps the FDA was more concerned with Pfizer’s latest financials.
Individuals, especially those taking medication or experiencing ongoing symptoms, would benefit from an independent program of storage and testing of blood, urine, saliva, and stool samples. They could leave samples periodically, let's say quarterly or semi-annually, have half the samples tested and the other frozen.
Individuals could sell part their data for a fee to independent testing labs. It might help keep these con artists in government and pharmaceutical korporations in line.
Good article.
The only reasons I can think they don’t want people to do antibody testing, is that they know there are many millions with natural immunity (and if they knew it, they’d be less likely to get the jab, costing Big pharmacy revenue), and it would make it harder to fearmonger.
*
I would characterize the decision as “with intent.”
Hear! Hear?
At what point does the FDA REMOVE it’s emergency use authorization, given the FACT that more have died from this “vaccine” than ALL vaccines in the past COMBINED???
How many fire alarms have to go off before you actually call the fire department?
If this was about public safety, they would not be shipping hoards of un-tested illegals to every state!
I’m actually surprised the FDA hasn’t approved this poison already!
God help us if they do!
Yup, there were billionaires to be made and kickbacks to fedgov from those billionaires.
A year after having contracted covid, I tested a high POSITIVE level of antibodies. Even though I am not anti covid vax (I think its a good idea for some), I am not getting the jab. I might wait for the Novavax, if my antibodies are gone by then. But who knows, it has been said that the aquired immunity might last several years. So for now, no jab for me, regardless of what the CDC is saying as of late.
But not profitable.
This is the same FDA who assessed e-cigarettes and found only trace amounts of chemicals used to clean the devices that were harmful. But they failed to note anthing about the single chemical the Surgeon General states on each pack of cigarettes as dangerous, tar. They refused to report the ZERO tar from e-cigarettes, and found them ‘harmful’.
It wasn’t an ‘error’. It was by design.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.