Posted on 07/30/2021 8:49:52 AM PDT by Az Joe
INTRODUCTION
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided. This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients. The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
*
The Nuremberg Code...is not codified as law in any legal jurisdiction in the world.
What is emergency use authorization (EUA)? (COVID Vaccine)
The FDA can issue EUA during a public health emergency—like a pandemic—to allow the use of unapproved medical products to diagnose, treat or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases. Prior to issuing EUA, safety and efficacy must be demonstrated and certain FDA criteria must be met; there also must be evidence that strongly suggests that patients have benefited from a treatment or test, and there are no adequate, approved or available alternatives. Learn more about EUA.
Why is the COVID-19 vaccine considered experimental?
Vaccines that receive EUA are considered experimental until the FDA formally approves it. It is possible that a rare side effect will be found after mass vaccination allows a longer term of observation on a larger number of people, but most side effects are picked up in the first several months after vaccination.
WRONG. The US Government says that it is an experimental vaccine/drug.
What is emergency use authorization (EUA)? (COVID Vaccine)
The FDA can issue EUA during a public health emergency—like a pandemic—to allow the use of unapproved medical products to diagnose, treat or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases. Prior to issuing EUA, safety and efficacy must be demonstrated and certain FDA criteria must be met; there also must be evidence that strongly suggests that patients have benefited from a treatment or test, and there are no adequate, approved or available alternatives. Learn more about EUA.
Why is the COVID-19 vaccine considered experimental?
Vaccines that receive EUA are considered experimental until the FDA formally approves it. It is possible that a rare side effect will be found after mass vaccination allows a longer term of observation on a larger number of people, but most side effects are picked up in the first several months after vaccination.
===========================
Americans mask:
The following shows the EUA were illegal.
Anyone arrested yet????
Might start e-mailing copies to... all of them.
.
My comment was about the code.
Yet, somehow, you heard “vaccine”.
Weird.
Josef Mengele would be so proud of Nancy Pelosi... from her forced medical decisions to her contempt for American ‘deplorables’ - - the undesirables... of our time.
Eff our white-trash ‘elites’...
Well... comments are posted by a commentor, i.e. postee, for others to cognitively digest and extrapolate or associate meaning. The reader of said comment(s) will then either dismiss and or respond, becoming the respondent. Repeat the aformentioned and communication ensues... Weird.
Bkmk
Last time I do your research for you mo fo.
The (Nuremberg) Kodex is considered by some to be the most important document in the history of clinical research ethics, which had a massive influence on global human rights. In America, the Kodex and the related Declaration of Helsinki form the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46,[16][17] which are the regulations issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for the ethical treatment of human subjects, and are used in Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). In 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights was adopted by the United Nations, and supposed to be in force by 23 March 1976. Article seven prohibits experiments conducted without the “free consent to medical or scientific experimentation” of the subject.[14] The Covenant has 173 states parties as of September 2019.
In his 2014 review, Gaw observes that the Kodex “not only entered the legal landscape, but also became the prototype for all future codes of ethical practice across the globe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code#Importance
Just in case this link gets lost....
Here stupid
https://news.gab.com/2021/07/29/important-download-covid-vaccine-religious-exemption-documents-here/
Oh so it means nothing? It’s just a piece of paper?
You agree with letting governments forcing experiments on humans against their Will?
This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ).
As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).
Excerpt from:
[American Medical Association] Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 2.1.1
The process of informed consent occurs when communication between a patient and physician results in the patient’s authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention. In seeking a patient’s informed consent (or the consent of the patient’s surrogate if the patient lacks decision-making capacity or declines to participate in making decisions), physicians should:
1. Assess the patient’s ability to understand relevant medical information and the implications of treatment alternatives and to make an independent, voluntary decision.
2. Present relevant information accurately and sensitively, in keeping with the patient’s preferences for receiving medical information. The physician should include information about:
1. The diagnosis (when known)
2. The nature and purpose of recommended interventions
3. The burdens, risks, and expected benefits of all options, including forgoing treatment
3. Document the informed consent conversation and the patient’s (or surrogate’s) decision in the medical record in some manner. When the patient/surrogate has provided specific written consent, the consent form should be included in the record.
I very much doubt that many people who have gotten the "jab" gave informed consent.
Some of its precepts are adopted in Federal regulations.
No government has adopted it as law.
So yes, just a piece of paper.
So, how do you interpret that to mean I support governments being allow to force experiments on humans against their will?
I simply put factual information on the table about the Nuremberg Code. The subject of this thread.
Jump to conclusions much?
Word!
Plus the universal principle that it is impossible for any part of the US government to act in an unetical fashion. we are the land of the free - free to do everything the government orders us to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.