Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archdiocese of Chicago requires vaccines, denies religious exemptions: Employees and clergy have six weeks to get the shot, and they'll still have an opportunity to request a medical exemption.
Chicago Business ^ | 08/24/2021 | Stephanie Goldberg

Posted on 08/28/2021 6:10:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Just as the Pope kowtowed to the Chinese government, he is now kowtowing to the policies of this one too. Is the Pope Catholic? The answer to that is no longer self evident.


21 posted on 08/28/2021 6:43:11 PM PDT by jimwatx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I can’t imagine that they have people lined up to get jobs working for the archdiocese. Just call their bluff.


22 posted on 08/28/2021 6:45:06 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Chauvin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No. Some Bishops have said we can take Pfizer and Moderna, but not J and J because more involved with fetal cells in manufacture.

But, J and J only are one injection and tend to have primarily Blood clots as side effect. The other two are mrna, brand new type of vaccine and totally unknown long term side effects.

BUT! If J and J only vax available can take it.. Confusing huh?

Take the most dangerous ones o.k. The safer one forbidden unless only one available.

And some Bishops and Pope disagree with the above, so what is a Catholic to do?

Ask Cupich.


23 posted on 08/28/2021 6:47:40 PM PDT by amihow (It is Western Civilization that confers privilege, not whiteness. Ask Carson, MLK, Sowell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Give them a copy of this that was posted by hopefully soon to be governor of Illinois Darren Bailey

EMPLOYERS, INSTITUTIONS, AND ALL PEOPLE IN ILLINOIS MUST ALLOW CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO MANDATED VACCINES AND TESTING

The Health Care Right of Conscience Act provides that employers and institutions in Illinois are forbidden from orally questioning someone about their conscientious objection to health care services. Health care services include vaccination status, because of the law’s broad definition of what health care services are, which includes medication. Vaccines are recognized as medicine, even by the CDC. The law is also clear that employment cannot be conditioned on whether a person has such an objection.

According to the law, health care means any phase of patient care, including but not limited to care or treatment rendered by any person at any public or private location, intended for physical, emotional, and mental well-being.

It is unlawful to discriminate against any applicant based on their conscientious objection to health care (vaccination, and “testing” specifically included), in terms of employment, admission to or participation in any programs for which they would otherwise be eligible, or to discriminate in relation thereto, in any other manner.

The language in the Act is so broad that it prohibits any person from discriminating against any other person, in any way (specifically including hiring, licensing, promotion, or any privilege), because of their conscientious refusal to receive health care (a vaccine or testing).

This law supercedes all law in Illinois that is inconsistent with it. That means that not even Lori Lightfoot, JB Pritzker, a concert venue, or a grocery store can condition services or entry, or anything else upon vaccination status without an exception for conscientious objectors.

Tip: To articulate a religious exemption to mandated testing, the Bible verses Matthew 9:12 and Mark 7:21-23 may be helpful to articulate your objection.

The first comment on this post includes a link for more information.

Pertinent sections of the Act:

(745 ILCS 70/7) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 5307)
Sec. 7. Discrimination by employers or institutions. It shall be unlawful for any public or private employer, entity, agency, institution, official or person, including but not limited to, a medical, nursing or other medical training institution, to deny admission because of, to place any reference in its application form concerning, to orally question about, to impose any burdens in terms or conditions of employment on, or to otherwise discriminate against, any applicant, in terms of employment, admission to or participation in any programs for which the applicant is eligible, or to discriminate in relation thereto, in any other manner, on account of the applicant’s refusal to receive, obtain, accept, perform, counsel, suggest, recommend, refer, assist or participate in any way in any forms of health care services contrary to his or her conscience.

(745 ILCS 70/5) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 5305)
Sec. 5. Discrimination. It shall be unlawful for any person, public or private institution, or public official to discriminate against any person in any manner, including but not limited to, licensing, hiring, promotion, transfer, staff appointment, hospital, managed care entity, or any other privileges, because of such person’s conscientious refusal to receive, obtain, accept, perform, assist, counsel, suggest, recommend, refer or participate in any way in any particular form of health care services contrary to his or her conscience.

(745 ILCS 70/2) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 5302)
Sec. 2. Findings and policy. The General Assembly finds and declares that people and organizations hold different beliefs about whether certain health care services are morally acceptable. It is the public policy of the State of Illinois to respect and protect the right of conscience of all persons who refuse to obtain, receive or accept, or who are engaged in, the delivery of, arrangement for, or payment of health care services and medical care whether acting individually, corporately, or in association with other persons; and to prohibit all forms of discrimination, disqualification, coercion, disability or imposition of liability upon such persons or entities by reason of their refusing to act contrary to their conscience or conscientious convictions in providing, paying for, or refusing to obtain, receive, accept, deliver, pay for, or arrange for the payment of health care services and medical care. It is also the public policy of the State of Illinois to ensure that patients receive timely access to information and medically appropriate care.

(745 ILCS 70/3) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 5303)
Sec. 3. Definitions. As used in this Act, unless the context clearly otherwise requires:
(a) “Health care” means any phase of patient care, including but not limited to, testing; diagnosis; prognosis; ancillary research; instructions; family planning, counselling, referrals, or any other advice in connection with the use or procurement of contraceptives and sterilization or abortion procedures; medication; surgery or other care or treatment rendered by a physician or physicians, nurses, paraprofessionals or health care facility, intended for the physical, emotional, and mental well-being of persons; or an abortion as defined by the Reproductive Health Act;
(b) “Physician” means any person who is licensed by the State of Illinois under the Medical Practice Act of 1987;
(c) “Health care personnel” means any nurse, nurses’ aide, medical school student, professional, paraprofessional or any other person who furnishes, or assists in the furnishing of, health care services;
(d) “Health care facility” means any public or private hospital, clinic, center, medical school, medical training institution, laboratory or diagnostic facility, physician’s office, infirmary, dispensary, ambulatory surgical treatment center or other institution or location wherein health care services are provided to any person, including physician organizations and associations, networks, joint ventures, and all other combinations of those organizations;
(e) “Conscience” means a sincerely held set of moral convictions arising from belief in and relation to God, or which, though not so derived, arises from a place in the life of its possessor parallel to that filled by God among adherents to religious faiths;


24 posted on 08/28/2021 6:48:12 PM PDT by Maudeen (https://thereishopeinJesus.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Archdiocese of Chicago this week announced all employees and clergy will be required to get vaccinated against COVID-19. While people will have an opportunity to request a medical exemption, religious objections will not be considered.


This is insane!!! Church not considering a religious exemption?!!?


25 posted on 08/28/2021 6:50:40 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

*ping*


26 posted on 08/28/2021 6:55:48 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (DEFEAT THE COUP D'ETAT BY THE STALINAZI DERP STATE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I suggest all those Priests simply refuse. Tell that wannabe dictator to take a long walk off a short pier. Tell their congregants that they will meet with all of them elsewhere. The truly faithful will support them.


27 posted on 08/28/2021 7:01:11 PM PDT by ocrp1982 ( Bibicly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wait, you mean the jab that DOESN'T stop the spread of said virus, even if fully jabbed?
28 posted on 08/28/2021 7:05:29 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Following the lead of Pope Francis....”

Well, that’s your problem right there, Blase.

BTW, for those who don’t know, Cupich transferred to Chicago from Portland after the death of Cardinal Francis George.


29 posted on 08/28/2021 7:06:32 PM PDT by twoputt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gil4

I use the term “Pope” very loosely these days.


30 posted on 08/28/2021 7:06:42 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

Do you have to be Catholic to work there? If not, don’t they have to honor a religious exemption?


31 posted on 08/28/2021 7:41:36 PM PDT by alternatives? (y along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

No choice really, the ImPopester is a heretic and is destroying the church.


32 posted on 08/28/2021 8:10:50 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Insisting on only the FDA approved vax (Comirnaty) might hold them off a bit.

I don’t believe there is much of it available in the U S


33 posted on 08/28/2021 8:23:02 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Back after a long hiatus. Now mygrandkidsgrandma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amihow
But, J and J only are one injection and tend to have primarily Blood clots as side effect. The other two are mrna, brand new type of vaccine and totally unknown long term side effects.

BUT! If J and J only vax available can take it.. Confusing huh?

Take the most dangerous ones o.k. The safer one forbidden unless only one available.



You do realize the JnJ shot does the same thing as the other two EUA ones, right? It just does it with more steps, and a different attack vector?

Pfizer/Moderna: lipid-wrapped mRNA that gets into cells, makes them create spike proteins, which your body then attacks.

JnJ: DNA inside an adenovirus shell gets into your cells, then makes mRNA to tell the cells to create spike proteins for your body to go after.
34 posted on 08/28/2021 8:26:38 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mygirlsmom
Insisting on only the FDA approved vax (Comirnaty) might hold them off a bit.

I don’t believe there is much of it available in the U S


Which is why the FDA said that Comirnaty and the current Pfizer shot under EUA can be issued interchangeably. For giving them to people, they are supposedly the exact same thing.

BUT, if you say that Moderna/JnJ should lose their EUAs now that there's an "approved" treatment, well, then Comirnity is definitely different and there's none available so yea...
35 posted on 08/28/2021 8:29:53 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

They can say that all they want but they,are LEGALLY distinctly different. And the old stuff is still under the EUA.

It’s a total bait and switch.


36 posted on 08/28/2021 8:35:49 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Back after a long hiatus. Now mygrandkidsgrandma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Gil4

Time to start a new church with a core creed that forbids experimental gene therapies


37 posted on 08/28/2021 9:10:43 PM PDT by Rural_Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; NFHale

Blase Fagsbitch has banned St. Michael’s Prayer for some reason. Some people think it’s too “aggressive” against....Satan.


38 posted on 08/28/2021 10:35:43 PM PDT by Impy ("We didn't steal the election, we swear!!!" - Sincerely, The Election Thieves )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Impy
I got certified as a Substitute Teacher in Crook county last year, only to see Gov. Lard Butt issue some dictate that ALL public school teachers in Illinois MUST BE VACCINATED.

Someone said I should try claiming a "religious exemption". How the heck would I do that with this worthless POS as the Catholic "leader" for the Chicago area? He's out dictating everyone else get vaccinated, too.

My only hope is this "must be vaccinated" stuff is like modern day "Don't ask, don't tell".... "Left my covid vaccination card at home today, oops!"

39 posted on 08/29/2021 12:10:30 AM PDT by BillyBoy ("States rights" is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Catholic Church, like the democrat taliban party, has become part of the enemy.


40 posted on 08/29/2021 3:11:36 AM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson