Posted on 09/15/2021 6:19:03 AM PDT by Mount Athos
A pathologist would now like to do more autopsies on the deceased who were vaccinated against Corona - and his theses have received a lot of criticism. He himself emphasizes that vaccination is an essential part of the fight against the virus.
The chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, Peter Schirmacher, urges many more autopsies of vaccinated people. In addition to corona deaths, the corpses of people who die in connection with a vaccination would also have to be examined more frequently, said Schirmacher of the German Press Agency in Stuttgart. The director of the Pathological Institute in Heidelberg even warns of a high number of unreported cases of vaccination deaths and complains: The pathologists do not notice anything about most of the patients who die after and possibly from a vaccination. However, other scientists disagree with him on this point, as do the Standing Vaccination Commission (Stiko) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
For a year now, corona deaths have been autopsied at the university clinics in the southwest in order to better understand the disease. The state supports the Covid-19 autopsy research of the university pathologies with around 1.8 million euros. Schirmacher heads the autopsy project. The findings of more than 200 autopsies so far have led, among other things, to better treatment and ventilation of Covid sufferers, he says. "The knowledge gained here therefore helps to be able to treat sick people better and more successfully and to save lives," says Science Minister Theresia Bauer (Greens). Schirmacher, a member of the National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina since 2012, hopes that the funding will continue next year.
Other scientists clearly criticize statements made by the chief pathologist The doctor now wants to get to the bottom of rare, serious side effects of vaccination - such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases. The problem from his point of view: Vaccinated people usually do not die under clinical observation. "The doctor examining the corpse does not establish a context with the vaccination and certifies a natural death and the patient is buried," reports Schirmacher. "Or he certifies an unclear type of death and the public prosecutor sees no third-party fault and releases the corpse for burial."
In Baden-Württemberg, the pathologists therefore worked with public prosecutors, the police and resident doctors, reports Schirmacher. More than 40 people have already been autopsied who died within two weeks of being vaccinated. Schirmacher assumes that 30 to 40 percent of them died from the vaccination. In his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is underestimated - a politically explosive statement in times when the vaccination campaign is losing momentum, the delta variant is spreading rapidly and restrictions on non-vaccinated people are being discussed.
Spice things up.
“Kinky…”
By “vaccinated people” does he mean people that have been injected with the *vaccine* or only people that the WHO and other agencies consider to have been “vaccinated”?
This should have been done on mice, not humans.
https://realrawnews.com/2021/09/dr-fauci-heck-no-i-havent-been-vaccinated/
https://realrawnews.com/2021/09/military-convicts-bill-gates/
Schirmacher heads the autopsy project. The findings of more than 200 autopsies so far have led, among other things, to better treatment and ventilation of Covid sufferers, he says. "The knowledge gained here therefore helps to be able to treat sick people better and more successfully and to save lives," says Science Minister Theresia Bauer (Greens). Schirmacher, a member of the National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina since 2012, hopes that the funding will continue next year.
Whew! This is just about careers, not about health or human life. I was worried for a second.
Enough policies with potential to fuel multi-million dollar lawsuits may cause the korporate pfascists and their government lackeys to think twice about violating the Nuremberg Code trying to force the Jim Jones Jab on victims.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Enough policies with potential to fuel multi-million dollar lawsuits may cause the korporate pfascists and their government lackeys to think twice about violating the Nuremberg Code trying to force the Jim Jones Jab on victims.”
There is no Nuremburg Code in US law. If you dispute that, then show me where it has been incorporated into US law by legislation or by treaty.
I see you're still working for the bio-lab and ignoring previous responses to your lie. You didn't even make it a month.
Again...the Nuremberg trials were led by the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, establishing Case Law which can again be used to arrest, charge, try, and sentence those who violated the Nuremberg Kodex.
The Nuremberg Kodex and the Declaration of Helsinki formed the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45 Part 46. The Totalitarians and their lackeys are being very coy about "suggesting" and "urging" to avoid blatant criminal violation of the CFR.
The United Nations adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which the United States signed on to, including Article Seven which prohibits experiments conducted without the "free consent to medical or scientific experimentation" of the subject. (Even illegal aliens in the United States, who might not have standing in a U.S. court, can have these criminals charged in international court).
Communists will accept no criticism (or needed correction) to social policy.
We saw this with the farming collectives in the 20th century where millions died due to the rejection of corrective action. So too with the injurious vaccines — they will continue to maim and kill because to do otherwise is to question the perfection of the glorious leader and his oligarchs.
“Chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg urges more autopsies of vaccinated people”
Preferably, after they die.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Again...the Nuremberg trials were led by the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, establishing Case Law which can again be used to arrest, charge, try, and sentence those who violated the Nuremberg Kodex.”
So, if these are law, what is the penalties for violating (legal cite pls).
T.B. Yoits wrote: “The Nuremberg Kodex and the Declaration of Helsinki formed the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45 Part 46.”
Do you know the difference between a regulation and a law? Once again, show me where the code was established into law by legislation or by treaty.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “The United Nations adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which the United States signed on to, including Article Seven which prohibits experiments conducted without the “free consent to medical or scientific experimentation” of the subject.”
Do you know the difference between a ‘emergency’ and a ‘experiment’? The vaccines were released under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). There is no such thing as an ‘Experimental Use Authorization”.
BTW, the Pfizer vaccine now has full approval so you lose on that front too. Moderna is expected to get approval within weeks.
In effect, you’re trying to make things up to suit your preferences. Nuremburg Code isn’t law. The vaccines are not experimental.
Pfizer's fraudulent EUA application said 1. it prevented infection, and 2. there were no other treatments available, both of which are not true.
T.B. Yoits wrote: “Pfizer’s fraudulent EUA application said 1. it prevented infection, and 2. there were no other treatments available, both of which are not true.”
Even if those statements are true, and they are not, those statements are irrelevant since Pfizer has full approval and Moderna will be fully approved within weeks. Therefore the EUA is no longer relevant.
BTW:
The vaccines do prevent infections. Not 100% of the time but that isn’t a requirement.
There are no other approved treatments. Regardless of your personal beliefs, ivermectin, HCQ, etc., are not approved treatments for COVID.
There are no other approved treatments. Regardless of your personal beliefs, ivermectin, HCQ, etc., are not approved treatments for COVID
and why the f do you think that is?
rolling_stone wrote: “and why the f do you think that is?”
Perhaps because those products are not effective or safe?
Perhaps because those products are not effective or safe?
wrong
I find it to be interesting that taking a look at the rabid pro-vaxer DugwayDuke’s posting history, out of 400 posts here on FR, I counted 4 total replies that didn’t have anything to do with the Wuhan Flu.
rolling_stone wrote: “wrong”
Prove it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.