Posted on 10/18/2021 10:49:36 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Bob434]
ransomnote: Great article addressing the CDCs insistance that damaging Remdesivir be given to Covid patients, despite it's history of causing renal failure and cardiac damage. I'll put a link to a related article at the bottom of this post. The images at the link are probably more visible on the website, but I'll include an image below in case it's legible.
A tale of two drugs. One has become the standard of care at an astronomical cost despite studies showing negative efficacy, despite causing severe renal failure and liver damage, and despite zero use outpatient. The other has been safely administered to billions for river blindness and now hundreds of millions for COVID throughout the world and has turned around people at death’s doorstep for pennies on the dollar. Yet the former – remdesivir – is the standard of care forced upon every patient, while the latter – ivermectin – is scorned and banned in the hospitals and de facto banned in most outpatient settings. But according to the NIH, a doctor has the same right to use ivermectin as to use remdesivir. And it’s time people know the truth.
Although the NIH and the FDA didn’t officially approve ivermectin as standard of care for COVID, it is listed on NIH’s website right under remdesivir as “Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19.” It is accorded the same status, the same sourcing for dosage recommendations, and the same monitoring advice as remdesivir … except according to NIH’s own guidance, remdesivir has a much greater potential for severe reactions in the very organs at stake in a bout with acute COVID.
SNIP
Just looking at the NIH’s own table, why in the world would remdesivir be the expensive mandatory standard of care and ivermectin, buttressed by 64 studies, be relegated to hemlock status even for patients about to die and with no other options?
Yes, we get the message – every one of those studies is supposedly low-powered, a fraud, and all the thousands of doctors turning people around on ivermectin are some how frauds even though they have nothing to gain and everything to lose from pushing it. But if that is our standard for ivermectin, it raises the obvious question about remdesivir. How could remdesivir not only be approved but made the standard of care when it has negative efficacy in trials, has a negative recommendation from the WHO, and, by the NIH’s own admission, causes liver and kidney failure?
Even if the medical establishment dismisses the preponderance of evidence and reality of the past 18 months, with ivermectin saving so many people, just from a safety standpoint, why would they not allow people to at least try something this safe while forcing on them a dangerous drug like remdesivir? In addition, these are the same hospitals that administer Olumiant, which has a rare FDA black box warning for blood clots, even though these very patients are at high risk for a pulmonary embolism and other clotting disorders?
In other words, there is no way anyone can justify the war on ivermectin (and every other cheap treatment that has been and will be proposed) as being rooted in anything related to medicine and science. If that were the case, the medical establishment would be dead set against remdesivir and Olumiant. Moreover, to the extent remdesivir has any efficacy that is worth its risk, it would be outpatient during the viral stage. There is quite literally no scientific way remdesivir can work in the pulmonary inflammation stage. Unlike ivermectin, which tones down inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1beta and IL-10 as well as tumor necrosis factor alpha, remdesivir has no anti-inflammatory qualities.
However, remdesivir does have a lot of political science behind it. Aside from having the weight of Big Pharma pushing it (and it was concocted by UNC-Chapel Hill, curiously the same institution at the center of the coronavirus gain-of-function research), hospitals get a 20% bonus for using it!
SNIP
MORE AT LINK
ransomnote: Horowitz is not the only one exposing the CDC's use of Remdesivir. Here's a related link:
Most Covid-19 Deaths were a direct result of the administration of Midazolam or Remdesivir – By Dr Mike Yeadon
theexpose.uk ^ | OCTOBER 11, 2021 | Dr. Mike Yeadon
:)
.
For Tomorrow.
Bookmark for manana.
Have you *PING*ed the usual jab apologists / Ivermectin resistant?
G
Thanks for posting ‘note.
The left needs the China Virus crisis to continue. It justifies mail in voting which is the key to large scale rigging of elections. Before mail in voting the left could only steal the close elections. Without mail in voting Hillary lost. With it , Biden won.
They had a close call with aspirin. Some IDIOT published a study saying that it worked really well against the virus, so they had to QUICKLY douse that claim...hence only a few days later, they essentially told everyone under 60 to stop taking aspirin.
Thank goodness we have people at the FDA looking out for the interests of Big Pharma or God only knows where we’d be now.
| BobL wrote: |
They had a close call with aspirin. Some IDIOT published a study saying that it worked really well against the virus, so they had to QUICKLY douse that claim...hence only a few days later, they essentially told everyone under 60 to stop taking aspirin. Thank goodness we have people at the FDA looking out for the interests of Big Pharma or God only knows where we’d be now. |
I had the same attitude you had but I couldn't write it nearly as well as you. I couldn't do it justice. Thank you!
Aspirin Use Is Associated With Decreased Mechanical Ventilation, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
journals.lww.com ^ | Oct 21, 2020 | Jonathan H. Chow, Ashish K. Khanna, Shravan Kethireddy, et al
My pleasure!
$3.00 vs $3,000.00
The WHO List of Essential Medicines
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325771/WHO-MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.06-eng.pdf
Includes HCQ & Ivermectin
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.