If Vaccine Adverse Events Tracking Systems Do Not Support Causal Inference, then “Pharmacovigilance” Does Not Exist

filesusr.com ^ | August 2021 | James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

[ransomnote]

[H/T Carl Vehse]

ransomnote: Full document (pdf) linked in thread title. Carl Vehese idenfied some key elements in a post elsewhere on FR. Here's his excerpt post.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women as researchers discover 91% of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage following Covid-19 Vaccination, Carl Vehse wrote:

The Editor of Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law recently published an editorial (Volume 3:81–86, August, 2021), "If Vaccine Adverse Events Tracking Systems Do Not Support Causal Inference, then ‘Pharmacovigilance’ Does Not Exist,” in which he refers to demands for censorship of scientific articles that contradict official [bureaucratic] positions:

The amount of time it takes for victims of vaccines to acquire a ruling on causality in the United States National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, based on debates over highly granular details of evidence in support of or countering the hypothesis of causality, is befuddling. In some cases, the debates between experts, mediated by special masters, can last over 10 years.

This pace stands in stark contrast to the lightning — perhaps miraculous, perhaps magical — speed with which physicians involved in short-term randomized COVID-19 vaccine trials determined the noncausality of the deaths that occurred following exposure to the first-in-human experimental mRNA vaccines.

It is sad to bear witness to the fact that science has degenerated into a war against unwanted and inconvenient results, conclusions and interpretations via the process of post-publication retraction for issues other than fraud, grave error in execution, and plagiarism. The weaponization of the process of retraction of scientific studies is well underway, and it induces a bias that could be called “retraction bias”, or, in the case in which a few persons haunt journals in search of studies that cast doubt on their commercial products, a “ghouling bias”, which leads to biased systematic reviews and warped meta-analyses….

Viewed on the basis of a reader’s difference of interpretation, journals that retract to maintain a prescribed narrative are participating in the etiological equivalent of bookburning.

Rage-quitting [by some editorial board members when a peer-reviewed journal paper presented data showing vaccine risks was not retracted] is not Science.

In an Addendum the Editor also noted:

As this was going into production, we learned that the US FDA has approved the marketed version of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for people over 16 years of age. These individuals did this without the required advisory committee meeting — a month after they were skewered in the media for approval of a drug for Alzheimer’s disease that has limited, if any, efficacy.

The stunning move by FDA decision on approval of the Pfizer vaccine was made by ignoring the massive number of post-market safety events reported to VAERS. Many physicians see this as FDA acting on <1% of the safety information available, and they note that Americans are being injured and killed by the vaccines. This is intolerable — and the entire HHS should undergo Congressional review.

We need a viable public health system that does not engage in profit incentive but instead uses science, logic and reason in the studies of what is causing poor health and killing people. A decentralized plan exists to replace the CDC (Plan B); perhaps now we need a similar plan to replace the FDA.

[ransomnote]

PING

[zipper]

I wonder if Gavin Newsom will file a VAERS report on his injuries?

Or if he will still support the jabbing of his children, in the age group 5 to11?

Oh wait, how foolish of me, of course his kids will be exempted, it’s only other people’s kids that will suffer and die.

Older people can suffer myocarditis from the jab, but the rate for young men is 100 times that rate — what does that say about the odds of myocarditis for young children?

[givemELL]

Although prudently reducing the child dosage by 1/3 that of adults, there is also included an adult heart attack medicine, tromethamine aimed at minimizing myocardial signs/symptoms of damage to children.

This is not mentioned in public news announcements re the child vaccine dosage. Are there adequate studies re the safety/efficacy of this addition as approved by the FDA or is it just an arbitrary approval?

The immunologic future of 28million US children, the current upcoming generation is an open unanswered and inadequately considered question.

The addition of tromethamine, which will have only a short term effect to get through the early period following vaccination is troubling. What happens later?

[datura]

It’s amazing how many are asleep and complacent about the genocide that is ongoing in this world. In a few years, I hope we are not saying “I told you so”.

Rather, I pray that they are all laughing at us for our belief that this vax is both evil and designed to reduce the herd, rather than bring herd immunity.

[Singermom]

Found this on another site. Good to share though.

Covid vaccine-related adverse events reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System through October 29. Such reporting reflects only a small fraction (1% to 10% per one study) of real-world events.
18,078 deaths
88,910 hospitalizations
95,954 urgent care visits
133,973 doctor office visits
32,851 severe allergic reactions
28,112 permanently disabled
20,111 life-threatening reactions
10,124 cases of shingles
8,878 heart attacks
7,844 cases of anaphylaxis
11,449 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis
10,721 cases of Bell’s palsy
4,123 thrombocytopenia/low platelet counts
2,786 miscarriages
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
For perspective, in over 25 years’ worth of experience with common flu vaccines, there have been fewer than 1,700 deaths reported in VAERS.

[zipper]

Although prudently reducing the child dosage by 1/3 that of adults, there is also included an adult heart attack medicine, tromethamine aimed at minimizing myocardial signs/symptoms of damage to children.

Yes, I saw that from another source — why would they do that unless they were expecting heart trouble?

This on top of the fact that the variance in weight between 5-year olds and 11-year olds can be double or more, with the same dosage of ingredients — how was that ‘scientifically determined’ and approved?

—-

Read the analysis below, it’s very detailed.

For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/what-is-the-number-needed-to-vaccinate

—-

Pfizer says their covid vaccine works in kids 5 to 11. does it?

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pfizer-says-their-covid-vaccine-works?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

[Singermom]

Harm is the point.

[entropy12]

Yeah like 225,000,000 adult Americans who chose to jab themselves with some experimental vaccine

That number will reach 90% of American adults by election day 2022.

When one thinks the whole world is crazy it is time to make appointment with a psychiatrist doctor.

[kvanbrunt2]

Complete follow up of all jabs should have been tracked as a requirement for the EUA. This was missed by Trump (not accusing as he had the whole of government against him.)

[oldtech]

It should be readily discernible to most everyone paying any attention at all, that there is something wrong with that vaccine for COVID....and with the people that are pushing it so hard, mandating it, etc.