Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How much money can you make promising to get satellites into orbit with a slingshot?
American Thinker ^ | 3 Dec, 2021 | Mick Rich

Posted on 12/03/2021 4:08:23 AM PST by MtnClimber

The founders of the company Spinlaunch are making a boatload, but it doesn't look as though they'll ever deliver.

Spinlaunch is a high-tech company that is attempting to modernize that biblical weapon, the sling. The Brothers Yaney are marketing Spinlaunch as the most efficient means to sling small satellites into orbit. The physics is straightforward, but the mechanics are anything but, and the financial rewards for the Brothers Yaney are out of this world. Who would think separating the wealthy from their money could be so much fun? And no, that is not the tagline to the movie The Brothers Bloom.

The physics of the Spinlaunch is simple: spin the launch vehicle faster and faster in a vacuum (to eliminate friction), then release the launch vehicle. The momentum at the point of release will be sufficient for the launch vehicle to a height of 200 miles above the Earth.

Spinlaunch's vacuum-enclosed prototype centrifuge (located at the New Mexico Spaceport) is three hundred feet across. The full-scale vacuum-enclosed centrifuge will be nine hundred feet across, making it the world's largest vacuum structure. If it does not collapse under the weight of gravity, it will collapse under the pull of the vacuum.

The Spinlaunch centrifuge will spin (10,000 gs) the 2,500-pound launch vehicle to 5,000 mph. A slight imbalance between the centrifuge and the launch vehicles or uneven wear on the critical parts would result in vibrations that could cause the structure to disintegrate. An error of just milliseconds in releasing the launch vehicle would cause the launch vehicle to touch the side of the launch tube, causing the structure to disintegrate. There would be enough energy when Spinlaunch disintegrates to destroy a small city.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: rubegoldberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2021 4:08:23 AM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why not use birds to fly the satellites into orbit. I would use African Swallows.


2 posted on 12/03/2021 4:08:42 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

What is the airspeed of a satellite-laden African Swallow?


3 posted on 12/03/2021 4:13:19 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: struggle

I don’t know. AIEEEEEE


4 posted on 12/03/2021 4:17:56 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I was picturing a carrier catapult a couple miles long..

“Spinlaunch will subject the satellites to ten thousand times the force of gravity,”


5 posted on 12/03/2021 4:18:40 AM PST by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jughandle

The forces from a rocket launch are a big consideration in satellite with weight limiting the mechanical design. This would seem magnitudes worse.


6 posted on 12/03/2021 4:21:42 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Maybe they could add voter registration and mail-in ballot boxes at their launch site for public support.


7 posted on 12/03/2021 4:23:50 AM PST by Tagurit (Are your pigs fed, watered and ready to fly?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Have your African Swallows been jabbed?


8 posted on 12/03/2021 4:23:53 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Seems like more of a trebuchet than a slingshot.
Agreed a far-fetched concept. No pun intended. Well maybe a little..


9 posted on 12/03/2021 4:24:10 AM PST by sonova (That's what I always say sometimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Politicians are in most cases, pretty ignorant and corrupt. The rest are simply corrupt. They are gullible to any scheme that promises high tech and lots of money flowing into the county or state or even the country simply because they know that a lot of that money will end up in a plain manila envelope in their pocket.
Spinlaunch is no different from Solendra or any of the EV manufactures or solar cell or even malls and manufacturer’s outlets. Operators like the Brothers Yaney cannot operate without corrupt and gullible politicians, mostly very wealthy politicians by the time they retire. Think Obama, Pelosi, McConnell and a myriad or others. 435 in the House and 100 in the Senate for starters.
10 posted on 12/03/2021 4:27:21 AM PST by Tupelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The G’s from one of those slingshot rides are bad enough! I can’t even fathom 10,000x. I’m no expert but I’d imagine that would crush a car pretty quick.


11 posted on 12/03/2021 4:30:04 AM PST by jughandle (Big words anger me, keep talking. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

12 posted on 12/03/2021 4:31:03 AM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonova

How is the payload going to survive the enormous centrifugal force that would unavoidably accompany the process of achieving escape velocity prior to launch via trebuchet?


13 posted on 12/03/2021 4:31:20 AM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
How about ATO (Airship To Orbit)?
These guys are doing it all on their own dollar (or donation). No government subsidy and so far they are making good progress.

The physics is just a little iffy as to whether or not it can really be done with current technology. But, that's what research is all about. It would be a really cheap way to space if it can be made to work.

14 posted on 12/03/2021 4:45:15 AM PST by Politically Correct (A member of the rabble in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The launce speed that they quoted was 5,000 mph. That would be nowhere near the speed required for a satallite in orbit (17,000 mph).

That is without even considering the huge(!) aerodynamic friction that the satallite would see on assent. The thing would look like a flamming meteor going up.


15 posted on 12/03/2021 4:46:51 AM PST by pelican001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The project suffered delays when celebrated rocket engineer Mike Hughes died while trying to launch his steam powered rocket


16 posted on 12/03/2021 4:55:49 AM PST by cyclotic (I won't give up my FREEDOM for your FEAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: \/\/ayne

Yeah, I would not want to be in one of those little buildings when the thing disintegrates. I would want to be 100 miles away at least.


17 posted on 12/03/2021 4:59:35 AM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Yeah, 10,000 gs?! About the only thing that will survive launch is a solid metal sphere. So great if you want to launch calsats, kind of useless for any real satellite.


18 posted on 12/03/2021 5:03:01 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Biden/Harris - illegitimate and everyone knows it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jughandle

Satellites need a specific velocity to maintain the orbit they are in. This speed is high enough that satellites burn up when they contact the upper atmosphere. In this case the slingshot velocity would need to be much greater than the orbital velocity to account for atmospheric drag and the change in potential energy between the Earth’s surface and the orbital height. That higher velocity would be at the dense part of the atmoshere right at the Earth’s surface. Preventing it from melting in the first 100,000 feet would be a big challenge.


19 posted on 12/03/2021 5:05:46 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Just use anti-gravity. Not that hard. Like frozen magnets and shit.


20 posted on 12/03/2021 5:09:19 AM PST by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson