Posted on 12/09/2021 4:07:21 AM PST by MtnClimber
Totally bogus argument. You are using numbers that have been proven to be lies and have never historically been used in this manner. The death count from the CDC has always needed 5-7 years to validate and the usual increase in death reports every year are reduced to a handful after verification You simply do not know what these numbers are, what they represent, or how they are used or validated. ‘A little information is dangerous’.
Seeing healthy people succumb to death after the jab is perfectly reasonable to make the connection.
It was a booster!
Interesting that the tyrants are pushing more for the vaccine and not trying to blame Trump for vaccine deaths.
I guess that will be later after the Jan 6th circus show and the herd is thinned out more.
“China through 23 months — ( 4,849 deaths since beginning of pandemic / 1,439,323,776 Chinese citizens ) x 100 = 0.0033 %
Source: Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center
Looking forward to your explanation.”
HAHAHAHA! R U freaking serious!? CNN must be your truth source as well! LOL!
From what I understand, the number reported by the VAERS is about 1 to 2 percent of the actual total number. Now go back and re-calculate it. It is more than 140,000.
If no data, data source of collection methodology is reliable, then all the discussion is moot.
Those advocating for the mRNA injections cite occasional sources, but mostly make assertions without sources. Or fall back to CDC pronouncements.
I am indeed “freaking serious” that the data sources throughout this “pandemic” are constructions, fabrications, forecasts which cannot be proven and blind assertions. That is the point.
The “pandemic” advocates from the start began with “bogus” and continue with “bogus” dressed up beautifully as “science.” And we here Fauci himself say he represents “science.” He represents bureaucracy and profit-harvesting pharmaceuticals. The point of the sentence you excerpted stands. If someone "believes" the JHU data in part, then they must believe it in the whole. Ditto with all the supposedly statistical data sources which one may want to cite. My observation is that the whole darn thing is bogus, there has been a "pandemic" which required the redefinition of pandemic in order to push "vaccines" by redefining vaccines and :boosters" as boosters. The con unravels. My reccomendation to you is to re-read the entire thread, and perhaps you will conclude something other than you have.
Very likely.
The number isn’t for people who died after being vaccinated.
It’s people who died after an adverse reaction to the vaccine.
Funny how no one seems to care how many die per day when “they” tell us how many died from Covid.
“It’s never mentioned that VAERS is an open system, where anyone can submit reports”
I did not know that. So, I can access VARES and submit anything. Huh...........
What would have value is a double blind study between VAXXED ans unVAXXED groups with similar demographics. But, the FDA does not seem interested in that. They seem to want the elimination of the control group by forced jabs.
The the drug companies were funded with billions in taxpayer money. The leftists in elected government, the FDA, CDC and OSHA are doing everything in their power, but being blocked by the courts, to mandate that everyone take the jabs. They take away the ability of suing for damages. AND they refuse to let non-FDA US citizens see the drug trial data that they paid for. The FDA reviewed the drug trial data in only about 4 months from several different drug companies. The data has been requested under FOIA requests, but (at least for the Pfizer BioNTech data) the FDA stated that it would take them 75 years to produce all of the data. I can only guess which data would be held until last.
So there is no scientifically valid, publicly available data on mRNA COVID injection adverse reactions. It just boils down to this - DO YOU TRUST THEM?
VAERS reports whatever someone enters into it, including accidents and suicides.
But that's beside the point. Regardless of the cause are there more deaths in the vaccinated group than in a comparable unvaccinated group?
If not, there's nothing there.
The CDC says:
As paraphrased by UNMC:
In other words, they’ve done their best to underreport rather than sensationalize their numbers and have given their reasons why.
Where have they gone wrong, in your opinion?
Are these vaxx and boosters really “safe and effective” as we are told or are there reasons to be concerned?
VAXX Macht Frei oder VAXX Macht Todt?
Already have it. And guess what. I am fine just like all the people I know and just like the public health experts explained.
It’s a lot more than that. Most people don’t report things to vaers.
I know, most people don’t report to VAERS. Most doctors don’t report to VAERS even if patients report to them. A 1-2 % reporting means that the real number is really so much more. The people throwing the 1-2% numbers around are naieve or playing games.
Both JHU and Worldometer use the CCP as a source:
https://source.opennews.org/articles/comparison-four-major-covid-19-data-sources/#johnshopkins
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/china/
http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/yqtb/202112/efdac7bd514b45b8b3b2012d04aefd2a.shtml
An indication of bad data from China is that using their numbers their “CFR/IFR” is 4x higher than the USA. Either really, really bad medical care or bad case/death numbers. Also, it stretches credibility when a similar population country (India) reports 34.6 million COVID cases and China reports 99,000. Cyprus a country with a pop. of 1.2 million is reporting 40,000 mores cases than China for gosh sake!
Anyway, not sure what the case/death numbers from China have to to with the thread topic of (USA) “VAERS Data Indicates the Covid Vaccines Have Killed At Least 140,000 Americans”??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.