Skip to comments.
Frontline Doctor: Millions Will Get AIDS From COVID Vax By The Fall
InfoWars ^
| 03/23/2022
| Jamie White
Posted on 03/25/2022 3:39:26 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-177 last
To: DugwayDuke
The 50 million pulled was AZD1222 Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. They used the same processing as B.1.1.7 manufactured in Australia.
161
posted on
03/26/2022 9:50:18 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Republican Wildcat
Well sure - it is like Nostradamus. Say enough things and one of them will surely end up resembling real events in hind sight. He didn't just pull things out of his Obama like you.
He read UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030, the white papers of the World Economic Forum, the promise to reduce the world's population to 500-million chiseled into the Georgia Guidestones. They have been telling us what they plan to do to us. They are proud of it. It's not a "conspiracy theory" if the conspirators shout their plans from the rooftops.
But all you know how to do is beat your pud and declare people who have tried to stop what's coming as "nuts."
The grocery store shelves are going to be empty soon thanks to New World Order co-conspirators like you.
Would you like some whine with your starvation?
162
posted on
03/26/2022 10:16:22 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Depopulate the depopulationists. --FJB)
To: Steve Van Doorn
It was called Co-miRNA-Ty for a reason. It wasn't just mRNA. They have 5 untranslated regions in these vaccines. Which means it MUST change cellular genome. What until you figure out the sequence of those 5 untranslated regions. The 50 million pulled was AZD1222 Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. They used the same processing as B.1.1.7 manufactured in Australia.
I'm trying to follow your reasoning in these two posts, but have to ask for your help to clarify.
In the first case, you reference "5 untranslated regions". I assume you're either referring to the Mrna in the "vaccine", or to the protein that it codes for. Is it one or the other, or both maybe? And what does it mean to "translate" the Mrna or protein? I think that there's general agreement that the Mrna in all of the different products codes for a modified version of the spike protein, which may be problematic in and of itself, but the question remains in my mind what specifically you are referencing.
In the second instance, you refer to the batch of australian product that was identified by the manufacturer as faulty, and withheld from the market. So far, so good. But what is the "processing (used for) the B.1.1.7 variant, formerly called "Kent variant" or Alpha? And what is the relation of the alpha variant to the AZ vaccine? Wasn't that based on the orignal Wuhan strain?
All very confusing, hope you can shed some light on this please. Thank you.
163
posted on
03/26/2022 12:05:31 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
164
posted on
03/26/2022 1:33:56 PM PDT
by
JonPreston
(Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
To: absalom01; Steve Van Doorn
Absalom, I am curious to understand what Steve has said. Thanks to both for this discussion.
To: bagster
This is such hog-wash article. 14 months after the 1st jab, 13 months after the 2nd jab and 3 months after the 3rd jab, I have more energy, zero health problems, at age 82.
Only problem I have right now is how to reduce my income tax from 6 figures to 5 figures.
166
posted on
03/26/2022 3:13:23 PM PDT
by
entropy12
(Blockade of Cuba by USA was OK by neocons, but Russia must tolerate NATO weapons on its border!)
To: absalom01; JonPreston
The vaccines where not mRNA they where actually microRNA or much more edited then we previously thought. For example they used three GP120 gene which is the surface of the HIV envelope.
As far as AZD1222 being pulled. I was simply saying they where the AstraZeneca vaccines made in Australia.
167
posted on
03/26/2022 3:43:36 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: entropy12
I have more energy, zero health problems, at age 82. Yea, but aren't you incredibly fat?
Only problem I have right now is how to reduce my income tax from 6 figures to 5 figures.
Then you could invest some of those savings in a salad bar or a lifetime pass for Nutrasystems weight loss program.
168
posted on
03/26/2022 4:07:07 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Steve Van Doorn; The Westerner
The vaccines where not mRNA they where actually microRNA or much more edited then we previously thought. For example they used three GP120 gene which is the surface of the HIV envelope.
Now I'm even more confused. Keep in mind I'm having to google the intel you're providing to even wrap my head around it. So you're saying that someone has figured out that the mRNA or miRNA includes a total of three copies of the gene that codes for the HIV capsid Glycoprotein GP120? Is this similar to Luc Montagnier's early notes about finding similarities to the HIV genome in the RNA of the CCP virus? Or is that a different matter altogether?
Even more mind-bending is that it was my understanding that micro RNA didn't actually code for a protien, but had something to do with gene expression, which is as far as my undergraduate biology class and my aging brain can remember.
You had previously warned that one of the vaccines (i can't remember which one) contained a gene to code for an antigen expressed by the malaria plasmodium parasite (at least that how I understood it). Is this another part of this same thing? Or is it an issue of contamination with actual antigens, on top of including genes that code for different proteins?
169
posted on
03/26/2022 6:06:41 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
170
posted on
03/26/2022 6:37:52 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Thank you, yes that luc Montagnier paper I was thinking of, which was an early clue that the virus probably originated in the lab in Wuhan rather than in nature. Lots of little breadcrumbs leading in that direction.
But this isn’t my field, and I’m still confused. I think that we probably agree that the virus escaped from a lab. What I don’t understand is things like “SARS-cov-2 is 72% SIV”. What does that mean? Is it that 72% of the genetic sequences of those two viruses is identical? Or is there a different definition of this? Presumably Montagnier and Perez used the same isolate that was being discussed worldwide at the time, being what was then called the Wuhan-Hu-1 sequence, also published here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1798174254
Moving on to the micro RNA issue, again, this is not my field, but what the abstract states is that “We found that BNT162b2 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication through degradation of negative strand viral RNAs that are completely paired with SARS-CoV-2 S-derived miRNAs. Further, CovS-miR-21 derived from BNT162b2 restores circadian rhythm and attenuate immunogenicity.”, which in my limited understanding seems to say that the vaccine interacts with viral micro-rna strands, not that it contains micro RNA. What isn’t clear to me is whether they are saying that the vaccine also codes for micro RNA in addition to the much-discussed spike protein codon.
Only asking because it seems that you have done a deep dive into all of this and because I can’t figure it out on my own.
171
posted on
03/27/2022 11:05:15 AM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
72% of the viral protein is HIV. Even know the antigen (spikes) are Plasmodium Yoelii (malaria)
found here:
https://twitter.com/JCPEREZCODEX/status/1491029873338753028 The key to your question is "RNAs that are completely paired with SARS-CoV-2 S-derived miRNAs"
Reword it a little:
"SARS-CoV-2" is the viral protein. S or subunit of the derived miRNAs or S1S2 viral protein(from the injection.)
RNAs that are completely paired with SARS-CoV-2. Which means they had to sequence the subunits to match the viral protein in order for them to bond.
To match them they used SIV(GP120) and dipped it in a solution of β-propiolactone (BPL) or formaldehyde solution to inactivate their new protein. The problem was Perez and Montagnier has made other papers showing the inactivation process didn't work. The injections are mutating.
This isn't my field either. During this research I found there are a very small number of what MD doctors call "chemist" and many of them have blinders on. They must know this is how you create autoimmunity.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902 When you question these chemist most of them sound like the trolls on FR that distract rather then answering the question. There are a few exceptions. Find a group on twitter (many banned including me) called #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
172
posted on
03/27/2022 2:20:16 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Ah, the graphic helps. Now I think I understand what Perez is saying here. He's found a region of the viral codon 273 base pairs long, with sequences that are identical to areas also found in various strains of HIV and SIV and form 72% of the base pairs in that region, per his note on the lower right. So, mighty suspicious, still after all this time, isn't it? And thank you for taking the time to walk me through all of this. But one more thing, if you have time. You say "Even know the antigen (spikes) are Plasmodium Yoelii (malaria)". You mean that the Spike protein is similar or identical to a protein found on or in the plasmodium parasite, right?
173
posted on
03/27/2022 3:46:58 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
Identical to Plasmodium Yoelii (malaria) according to Perez paper.
To be clear. parasites and bacteria(virus) do not mix in nature.
Shi Zhengli the lady in charge of Wuhan-Hu-1 has a history of very unethical working conditions. Note Peter Daszak (EcoHealth) comment. How he stored this highly questionable virus which later he found out bonded to human genes. In other words lab tech's where exposed it would seem.
https://twitter.com/TheSeeker268/status/1496609081087332355
174
posted on
03/27/2022 4:33:35 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Identical to Plasmodium Yoelii (malaria) according to Perez paper.
That’s the part that doesn’t make sense to me. The malaria parasite is vastly bigger than the virus, let alone the spike protein. But thanks for the conversation.
175
posted on
03/27/2022 4:50:42 PM PDT
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: absalom01
176
posted on
03/27/2022 5:03:51 PM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Jan_Sobieski
InfoWars. A gathering place for the lunatic fringe. Alex Jones is only half right at best.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-177 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson