Yea, but aren't you incredibly fat?
Only problem I have right now is how to reduce my income tax from 6 figures to 5 figures.
Then you could invest some of those savings in a salad bar or a lifetime pass for Nutrasystems weight loss program.
Posted on 03/25/2022 3:39:26 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
The 50 million pulled was AZD1222 Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. They used the same processing as B.1.1.7 manufactured in Australia.
He didn't just pull things out of his Obama like you.
He read UN Agenda 21, UN Agenda 2030, the white papers of the World Economic Forum, the promise to reduce the world's population to 500-million chiseled into the Georgia Guidestones. They have been telling us what they plan to do to us. They are proud of it. It's not a "conspiracy theory" if the conspirators shout their plans from the rooftops.
But all you know how to do is beat your pud and declare people who have tried to stop what's coming as "nuts."
The grocery store shelves are going to be empty soon thanks to New World Order co-conspirators like you.
Would you like some whine with your starvation?
The 50 million pulled was AZD1222 Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. They used the same processing as B.1.1.7 manufactured in Australia.
I'm trying to follow your reasoning in these two posts, but have to ask for your help to clarify.
In the first case, you reference "5 untranslated regions". I assume you're either referring to the Mrna in the "vaccine", or to the protein that it codes for. Is it one or the other, or both maybe? And what does it mean to "translate" the Mrna or protein? I think that there's general agreement that the Mrna in all of the different products codes for a modified version of the spike protein, which may be problematic in and of itself, but the question remains in my mind what specifically you are referencing.
In the second instance, you refer to the batch of australian product that was identified by the manufacturer as faulty, and withheld from the market. So far, so good. But what is the "processing (used for) the B.1.1.7 variant, formerly called "Kent variant" or Alpha? And what is the relation of the alpha variant to the AZ vaccine? Wasn't that based on the orignal Wuhan strain?
All very confusing, hope you can shed some light on this please. Thank you.
.
Absalom, I am curious to understand what Steve has said. Thanks to both for this discussion.
This is such hog-wash article. 14 months after the 1st jab, 13 months after the 2nd jab and 3 months after the 3rd jab, I have more energy, zero health problems, at age 82.
Only problem I have right now is how to reduce my income tax from 6 figures to 5 figures.
Yea, but aren't you incredibly fat?
Only problem I have right now is how to reduce my income tax from 6 figures to 5 figures.
Then you could invest some of those savings in a salad bar or a lifetime pass for Nutrasystems weight loss program.
Now I'm even more confused. Keep in mind I'm having to google the intel you're providing to even wrap my head around it. So you're saying that someone has figured out that the mRNA or miRNA includes a total of three copies of the gene that codes for the HIV capsid Glycoprotein GP120? Is this similar to Luc Montagnier's early notes about finding similarities to the HIV genome in the RNA of the CCP virus? Or is that a different matter altogether?
Even more mind-bending is that it was my understanding that micro RNA didn't actually code for a protien, but had something to do with gene expression, which is as far as my undergraduate biology class and my aging brain can remember.
You had previously warned that one of the vaccines (i can't remember which one) contained a gene to code for an antigen expressed by the malaria plasmodium parasite (at least that how I understood it). Is this another part of this same thing? Or is it an issue of contamination with actual antigens, on top of including genes that code for different proteins?
Thank you, yes that luc Montagnier paper I was thinking of, which was an early clue that the virus probably originated in the lab in Wuhan rather than in nature. Lots of little breadcrumbs leading in that direction.
But this isn’t my field, and I’m still confused. I think that we probably agree that the virus escaped from a lab. What I don’t understand is things like “SARS-cov-2 is 72% SIV”. What does that mean? Is it that 72% of the genetic sequences of those two viruses is identical? Or is there a different definition of this? Presumably Montagnier and Perez used the same isolate that was being discussed worldwide at the time, being what was then called the Wuhan-Hu-1 sequence, also published here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1798174254
Moving on to the micro RNA issue, again, this is not my field, but what the abstract states is that “We found that BNT162b2 inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication through degradation of negative strand viral RNAs that are completely paired with SARS-CoV-2 S-derived miRNAs. Further, CovS-miR-21 derived from BNT162b2 restores circadian rhythm and attenuate immunogenicity.”, which in my limited understanding seems to say that the vaccine interacts with viral micro-rna strands, not that it contains micro RNA. What isn’t clear to me is whether they are saying that the vaccine also codes for micro RNA in addition to the much-discussed spike protein codon.
Only asking because it seems that you have done a deep dive into all of this and because I can’t figure it out on my own.
found here: Identical to Plasmodium Yoelii (malaria) according to Perez paper.
That’s the part that doesn’t make sense to me. The malaria parasite is vastly bigger than the virus, let alone the spike protein. But thanks for the conversation.
InfoWars. A gathering place for the lunatic fringe. Alex Jones is only half right at best.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.