LGBTQ++....Now they added a second “+”. Is that now Double Pedophile?
Grooming.
What did you think fag marriage was all about? It wasn’t about “expressing their love” or “equal rights”. No, it was about adopting children to groom and rape.
And yet Republicans, for the most part, did NOTHING to stop it.
And now we have trannies in our schools and in our libraries grooming kids and messing up their minds.
“Leftists claim it’s anti-LGBTQ+....”
If they are doing grooming and some are, Tough. If their apologists protest Tough!
This ping list is for the other articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)
The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
Knowing that schools have now admitted that they are about sexualizing children, WHY in God’s name would someone send their kids there for most of the day? There is no reason good enough that can be used to justify such an action.
Well technically they are correct.
The LGBTQ+ crowd are the groomers.
So going after the groomers is anti-LGBTQ+.
What’s the problem there?
It is important we use the word grooming a lot.................
It communicates and leaves a word picture.
Looks like we are over the target.
Just as minstrels in an earlier age put on blackface and mimicked the worst stereotypes of black people for entertainment, so are these modern day men giving women the same treatment.
By dressing flamboyantly, using exaggerated hand/facial gestures and prancing about like sissies, their caricatures of what they think women are like is no different than how those minstrels in blackface tried to portray black people. They demean and marginalize women. I'm surprised that women put up with this.
They have to, it calls them out and stops their depraved agenda.
Headline should read
The Groomers are waging war on the word Groomer
If the groomers don’t want to be called groomers, then they can stop grooming... otherwise we are gonna call them what they are... sick perverted groomers
They have absolutely no problem with actual groomers, just the word. They are truly an evil bunch.
Truth terrifies the Left, especially the child endangering ones.
Like every other truth, they HATE it!
Next to American Thinker, the best site on the internet has got to be Libs of TikTok
With all due respect Andrea, your site sucks.
Your editing is terrible, your authors repeatedly fail to do the most basic fact-checking or think things through before publishing them (more on that later), and for a while when you stopped letting people post comments to your articles, you gave no reason AND you smugly demeaned your customers:
Second, it’s lovely that many of you came here for the conversation in the comments. To have the comments abruptly turned off was the equivalent of our breaking up your party, the great party at which all the guests were interesting and delightful. We appreciate what an unpleasant shock and disappointment that was, and we hate to be the mean parent who broke up the party but, again, sometimes you have to do what you have to do. (emphasis added)
To be fair Andrea, the WORST "conservative" new media outlet is Gateway Pundit. But your steaming pile is a fast second place follower.
Indeed, in this here article, which basically posits that the left is trying to change the perception of the word "groomer" you write...
It's important to understand that the word “groomer,” a pejorative,
"Groomer" is NOT "a word or phrase that has negative connotations or that is intended to disparage or belittle". It is an accurate description of an act of deliberately establishing an emotional connection with a child to prepare them for sexual abuse. It's cut and dry, and in this context it's easy to see why lestists are enraged - it's a descriptive and accurate word with tremendous emotional attachment, that exposes them.
To be fair, some people use that word with a perjorative INTENT. But if "groomer" being perjorative hinges on the intent of the speaker, and as our editorial wizard Andrea writes ...
Nevertheless, leftists are now going after the word groomer because they claim it’s an anti-LGBTQ+ slur
...then the prosecution just successfully argued the case for the defense.
American Thinker is like that drunk uncle at the wedding, taking the mic at the toast and puking during the first dance. You are an embarrassment to Deplorables and anyone who cherishes the truth, freedom, and good writing.
And for the record, Free Republic is the BEST site on the internet.
Their bullsh*t might work on many lilly white emasculated American fathers and woke mothers, but the people pouring into the country from the third world aren’t gonna be so pliable. These groomers are gonna be cruisin’ for a bruisin’.
Also start calling public schools "child rape camps".
Also see my tagline. :)
This is an excellent article. In comments, someone posted a 6 stripe-pretend rainbow flag, with the words, “Bullies gotta bully, Groomers gotta groom.”