Posted on 09/08/2022 9:27:24 PM PDT by OneVike
“Go ‘educate’ someone else.”
See? ;-)
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?
If I saw TRUTH in what you wrote, maybe I’d have a response.
Good Night!
Thanks, because I am truly shocked at the number of FReepers who are clueless about what we fought every war for. Not to colonize, but to be free and free others.
All this, and 250 years later there are more nations that would rather have us on their side than have us against them.
No country in the history of the World has shed so much of it's own blood to free and defend those from nations around the World. I truly cannot come up with one time England did it.
Oh some will say WWI and WWII, but they went to war each time, because they knew they had no choice or they would be attacked.
I am an American, and I do not bow down to any king or queen, especially one we kicked out twice. Only leftist idiots like Obama and Biden do such things.
One more thing to add to the dislike for them, they would have sided with the South in the Civil war to divide us for an easier defeat down the road if it wasn't for the fact that Lincoln brilliantly freed the slaves to make slavery the issue instead of states rights. Once it became about slavery, England had to decline Jefferson Davis's plea for their help.
“ And devoutly pro baby murder.”
Show me the quote from her that backs up your statement
His guy does not know jack about history.
William the Conqueror invaded England in 1066. 2022-1200 = 822 so he is off by over 250 years at best. Not to mention the fact that many different families have ruled England since William killed the last Saxon King Harold.
So the Brits left them with institutions they didn’t have before and prospered from since
Again I ask what are you
That’s what forms all the sound and fury here
Spit it out man
I don’t hide my perspective
Show some balls and tells us your background and ethnicity and this Brit resentment
I already asked if you were a clover ape
Bannon today declared himself a republican irish but loved the queen and agreed with tuckers opine despite his own roots
So again. Be honest
Are u are boer?
I’m give u a pass if so
The Queen has always been said to place great importance on her faith, and many of her public statements seem to reflect that. For me, however, there will always be one enormous black mark on her long reign: her giving of Royal Assent to the 1967 Abortion Act, which has resulted in the violent destruction of more than six million pre-born boys and girls.
I can see many of my monarchist friends begin to roll their eyes. The Queen couldn’t have refused to sign without causing an enormous crisis, they could rightfully say. Why must it always be about abortion? many others would ask in tired tones. (I heard the same complaint when our anti-abortion truth truck crossed in front of Prince William and Princess Kate’s motorcade at the 2013 Calgary Stampede as they waved to the cheering crowds.) But to dismiss that assent as morally meaningless is to ignore what abortion is. Six million of Her Majesty’s tiniest subjects were cruelly snuffed out and discarded for the crime of being inconvenient, and regardless of her personal views on the matter, this was done with her official permission.
Not all European monarchs reacted to the undeniably intense pressure to rubber-stamp royal legitimacy onto abortion legislation in this fashion. In 1990, for instance, King Baudouin I of Belgium notified his cabinet that he could not, in good conscience, give his Royal Assent to proposed laws permitting abortion. In Belgium as in most other constitutional monarchies Royal Assent was considered to be a mere formality. But King Baudouin’s conscience did not permit him to put his signature on what he believed to be an unjust and immoral law, and his government was thus forced to come up with a novel solution. The New York Times, in an article titled “Belgian King, unable to sign Abortion Law, takes day off,” recorded how the strange situation played out:
The civilian Government temporarily suspended King Baudouin I from power today after he declared that he could not, in good conscience as a Roman Catholic, sign a new law permitting abortion.
After declaring the King ”unable to govern,” the Cabinet assumed the King’s powers and promulgated the abortion law, which was published in the official gazette. And it called the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate back from Easter vacation for a special session on Thursday.
The lawmakers will be asked to vote on the proposition that the 59-year-old King is once again able to govern.
The following day, the king was promptly reinstated. Unlike other European monarchs, including Elizabeth II, he had avoided becoming complicit in legalizing abortion—because he refused to abandon his principles.
https://thebridgehead.ca/2016/06/13/her-majesty-queen-elizabeths-abortion-regime/
There is NO END to what could be added.
You sure got the ‘royal family ass kissers upset’ ......LOL!
So hilarious. There are NUMEROUS “royal family” ass kissing threads where these people could go and post their fawning and slobbering but you have to upset their little “royal family” love fest with this.....LOLOLOLOLOLOL! It was easy to see, right at the get go, that this was the place for people that don’t throw themselves face first on the ground and lick the feet of the New World Order “you vill eat ze bugs, own nothing and be happy, while we own it all and destroy you” globalist pukes. Exactly why I was drawn to this thread and skipped over the “ass kissing” ones.
You did such a great job that even some of the ‘bully gang’ came out of their holes to attack you. I love where you’re accused of “being jealous of wealthy people”. Wealthy people that enjoy their wealth is fine, it’s the ones that use their wealth to shove their globalist agenda on the world that are the problem.
The British people better get ready because the WEF king is in charge. Charles kisses the WEF’s ass more that the freepers around here kiss the Queen’s.
I love the title to this. Implies Charles is the Brit’s Hunter Biden. Guess that makes the Queen....
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/the-wef-king-ascends-to-the-british
If only the ass kissers would take a little time away from their fawning and slobbering and do a bit of investigation into what these people are all about, they will realize they NEVER HAVE AND NEVER WILL give a rip about “the useless eaters”. Except how to get rid of us.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1560007193835016192
Thanks for the thread.
The first monarchy began in 1200
True William replaced them, but it was already under the control of a monarchy, all that happened was a new family took over a get the invasion. They assumed all that belonged to the prior ones
New owner same place
5% Blackfoot Indian
20% Scott
26% Irish
50% Norwegian
100% American
Ancestors came over in 1732
Ancestors fought in every war going back the the French and Indian wars
Yours???
It's been a, I attest professional fake wrestling but will barrow a term from the sport, ahemmm a Battle Royal, if you will.
Well my powder was kept dry, and I kept fighting the enemy regardless of their swelling ranks. There was a time or two I had to use my scabbard, but it was good to see the Red Coats flounder under me blade.
Some were ruthless, but when the battle got heavy I realized the fools came at me with rubber bullets that bounced off. Thus I stood in the meadow challenging their best and their best were not up to the challenge. I must give credit to a few cohorts who showed up to help me when things got tricky, but they too fought valid toy and helped scatter the invaders.
Their is still a few lingering scalawags who are itching fir a defeat, but I honor my country by fighting till I'm the last man standing if I must. I fight for God's truth, and the American way. It is after all the only way. I felt I had no choice, for I carry on my shoulders a heavy burden placed upon my by ancestors who fought alongside that great General George Washington, not sure you heard of the fellow, but he was a great one that old Indian fighter.
My fathers fathers were pinned down by the ancestors of these lackluster wannabe Red Coats, yet he took across that fridges water way and gave them are true fighting. Good old Uncle Shmitd took one on the head that day, but the others finely won the battles.
My namesake Clarence Leander Carpenter, ( my true babe is Clarence Ness) Was at Chesapeake Bay When these same cowards attacks the good ole USA in her infancy, and I remember Uncle Jake Carpenter fighting for Grant in 1863 at Vicksburg, but he lost 3 brothers there. It was a bloody battle they fought but overall it was taken easier than thought. The poor boys took a cannon shot and all went into Glory singing Yankee Doodle together.
Then there was Frank Ness, my fathers brother who died in Normandy. Lost his battle on the beach, poor fella never even got off his all's ding boat, the Krouts hit it while it was 20 feet from shore. Uncle Orland ness fought bravely on Korea, you may remember that little skirmish, most never heard of it though. He would go on to retire as a SGt Major in Nam.
I have nephews who did there fair share and to this day I have younger deletions who are waiting fir their call to duty.
Yes we fought the good fight, some of us cane home, some left this Work with a bang, but from the battle of Ft Necessity to the streets of Kandahar there has been a close blood relative who has taken up the battle, and in their honor I stand tall and will never back down, lest they ridicule me when I meet the in Glory.
Thanks fir finding to me side brother.
Yeah for some reason your words on someone dying does not exactly sound Christian to me.
You’re too stupid to have a dialog with. Bye.
perhaps you didn’t see my invisible /s
Gotcha.
LOL, been a long thread and my dander is up and I am on the defense and offense at the same time.
“Are u are boer?
I’m give u a pass if so”
I’ll second that. There was some wicked behavior by Redcoats and Loyalists during the American Revolution but it pales in comparison to the brutality the British inflicted on the Boers. If you were looking for the origin of the 20th century concentration camp you might find it there.
She was very influential in moving UK away from its colonialist past into its present multi-racial society. During her reign, she encourated the increase in the size of the British Commonwealth from seven nations to 56 nations and additional territories, so that UK could extend civilizing care and concern for third-world nations as well as full governmental cooperation with first-world nations like Canada and Australia.
As the patron of many, many charities and civic betterment organizations, she performed several traveling appointments in addition to reading the minutes from Parliament every single business day of her adult life until she contracted covid this past February at the age of 95. She continued reading the Parliament notes and meeting with the incoming an outgoing Prime Ministers until two days before her death last week.
She was the top diplomat in the UK, performing with her working family members many of the functions we expect of our State Department, as well as hosting multiple groups and individuals among her citizens throughout the year for special recognition or thanks.
She was one of the most devoted, dedicated public servants who ever lived. Ever. And it was her Christian faith that underscored her understated diplomacy and fidelity to exquisite protocol that appeared effortless, but surely was not.
She was a fervent guardian of Western Civilization for the past 86 years, since she became heir to the throne when her uncle stepped down in 1936. Her reign will prove equal in impact to Benjamin Franklin or one of our Founding Fathers. Books will be written about her for centuries.
Queen Elizabeth II was not the Queen Mother. Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was the Queen Mother; she died years ago.
I am not questioning her faith, I am pointing out that GOD put her in a place to do the right thing, instead she gave her stamp of official approval on legalizing Abortion.
You go ahead and justify that, I won’t.
What ever, the moment she died, the new Queen became the only living Queen Mother, and she assumed the position as the head of the Anglican Church of England.
Throughout history, the one who is alive is considered the queen mother, not the dead one any more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.