Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Skooz

we’re at least two decades past that point

humans can no longer compete with computers in anything that can be reduced to pure computation

if you want to defeat a computer at something, you need to introduce elements for which mere computation is insufficient to evaluate them


14 posted on 09/20/2022 4:22:24 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator
we’re at least two decades past that point

Not quite. My post wasn't concerning computers vs humans, but that computers will eventually map out every possible move and countermove.

Found this on them interwebs:

The number of possible chess moves has been estimated to be even more than the number of atoms in the universe. The number of atoms in the universe is thought to be as many as 10 to the 81st, or 10 multiplied by itself 81 times, while the number of possible moves in chess is estimated to be 10 to the 120th.

That humans could no longer compete with computers was made clear when Big Blue beat Kasparov. Although, Gary had a good point when he pointed out that the computer was programmed specifically to beat him, being loaded with all of his previous games. I speculate (with nothing to back me up) that if another grandmaster would have taken Kasparov's place, he would have beaten the computer.

Of course, that was almost 20 years ago and computers have gained a great deal of power since then.

26 posted on 09/20/2022 5:27:05 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson