outflow
Thread deleted by Boss himself!
Retread (by many names) wanted to make trouble on FR again..
Posted on 09/26/2022 3:04:50 PM PDT by Cathi
Here's another good quote from the video:
"....you threaten the national existence of Russia and National existence doesn't just mean going after Moscow.... means threatening Russian territorial Integrity the Russian Nation, um and by expanding the definition of the Russian Nation to include these four uh previously Ukrainian territoriesum
Russia is putting NATO on notice that the game you were playing, you know, the one where you were just going to keep pouring weapons in so that Ukraine thought they could retake these territories. If you keep playing that game it's now Ukraine trying to capture Russia, and we will use all the means at our disposal to deal with this.
now the notion that Russia would go from a to z....uh or from zero to sixty like that is absurd he said all the means we have many we have many capabilities more more than NATO he said but he didn't say nuclear he said capabilities there you go now there are Hypersonic weapons out there there are new generations of weapons and he said that some that NATO is not even aware of yet we have capabilities some which NATO aren't even aware of the collective West um
and I think what you're going to see is that if Ukraine continues to aggressively pursue territorial re-acquisition with the support of NATO that Russia may end the special military operationand move into war because now Russia is going to say legally speaking you're attacking Russia, therefore we will declare we will article 51. "
Wow, that’s a long sentence. Exactly how crazy people talk.
It’s a computer generated transcript. Software translates the audio into text without punctuation.
Pick a credible source.
Are you in favor of another protracted foreign war like Iraq and Afghanistan? Are you so obtuse that you can’t see we’re being drawn into a possible WWIII scenario with Russia?
If you disagree with Scott Ritter and other alternative news sources like him, then scroll past. If you agree with everything the mainstream media is shoving down our throats—even after 6 years of daily attacks on Trump and 2 years of covid hysteria—then don’t bother doing your own research about what’s happening in Ukraine. You’re way past trying to save.
But don’t complain when it’s your children and grandchildren being sent to fight in another foreign land!
Many of us here are hoping to avert any further escalation so that doesn’t happen and to stop the financial hemorrhaging we’re all suffering from as a result of our involvement. And for our trouble, we get called all sorts of inflammatory names by other Freepers. It’s bizarre!
Did you follow William Rivers Pitt and Scott Ritter in the Ira war? Do you know their history, their criminal background, and that they were as anti-Republican extremists as possible?
And just to answer it, they were both disgraced drunks and major criminals from DU back then.
This is what Russian supporters want to go with now?
I just mentioned him but wow.
https://twitter.com/WRPitt/status/1573066518354661378
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217197580
This sack of shit from DU that was Ritter’s best friend and a just killed himself.
Is he allowed near schools again? I don’t remember.
If he attacks Poland he will need to use nukes. Because NATO will eviscerate his military.
That would show that he’s completely unglued.
Now, if the media only presents one side of any issue and tries to browbeat it into me, I know they’re hiding something and I seek out alternative viewpoints. Western media is fronting for the globalists and neocons, and you’re a fool if you refuse to do your own research and look at all perspectives.
Pitt and Ritter types said this same stuff in 2003-2006 that the US government was worse than anything. You may agree with them, but often they’d just say if their party was in power than everything is ok.
See that a lot. Is it right or wrong? I know the Pitt/ritter side was wrong.
oops, meant ‘outflow’.
Actually a shame the thread was deleted... So much to see there :P
Who would that be? CNN? The Daily Mail? Those are both credible to the loud mouth 7%er's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.