Skip to comments.
Pelosi: I’m proud to protect marriage as one of my last acts as speaker (Hurl alert)
Newsroom ^
| 8th December 2022
| Nancy Pelosi
Posted on 12/10/2022 1:10:53 PM PST by Ennis85
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
"It also finally repeals the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act, so that no future MAGA majority in Congress or president in the White House can wield this policy as a weapon of bigotry."
Yeah, which President signed off on that again?
1
posted on
12/10/2022 1:10:53 PM PST
by
Ennis85
To: Ennis85
Only a democrat can be destroying marriage and call it “protecting marriage”.
2
posted on
12/10/2022 1:12:04 PM PST
by
I want the USA back
(Our news media isn't worth camel spit. Neither is the democrat party. )
To: I want the USA back
The Democrat Party has gone full Orwell.
3
posted on
12/10/2022 1:13:01 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: I want the USA back
It’s Orwellian Ministry of Truth-level irony, isn’t it? “Protecting marriage” now apparently means “turning marriage into a total joke.”
To: Ennis85
The perished and punished people of Sodom and Gomorrah rolled over in their graves....
5
posted on
12/10/2022 1:16:20 PM PST
by
cranked
To: Ennis85
These pukes are criminally insane...
But the vile, demonic Botoxian will be sorely missed by all once it returns to hell from whence it came. It won’t be much longer before that decrepit body finally falls over and croaks. The Reaper is probably sharpening up his scythe as we speak.
6
posted on
12/10/2022 1:19:27 PM PST
by
lgjhn23
(Pray for America....)
To: Ennis85
Guess she is so supportive because of her “husband”. She’s a beard.
To: Ennis85
A lot of selective memory throughout all of this it unbelievable, I mean really? “twisted and unsound reasoning”? The same positions that were shared by Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden until they conveniently “evolved” their positions, just what were they?
8
posted on
12/10/2022 1:20:15 PM PST
by
Ennis85
To: Ennis85
Again, the Federal government has NO BUSINESS getting involved. Gays can travel to get friendly states. This is a pure powerplay for Federal overwhelming control. FU Nancy.
To: Ennis85
Pelosi: I’m proud to
protect pervert marriage as one of my last acts as speaker
Fixed it.
- Lev 18:22"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
- Lev 20:13"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them."
- Romans 1:26-30 That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.[31]
- 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate (malakos), nor abusers of themselves with mankind (arsenokoitai), Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.[41]
- 1 Timothy 1:8-11 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers; For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind (arsenokoitai), for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.[42]
It always amazes me that they chose "Pride" as one of their main slogans. Or that they corrupted God's rainbow to mean something else.
- Proverbs 16:18 Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
10
posted on
12/10/2022 1:24:36 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Kaiser8408a
It should be challenged in court as a state’s rights issue.
The last ruling clearly said the power was being returned to the states.
11
posted on
12/10/2022 1:25:40 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: Ennis85
Nancy is proud that her hubby is gay, I guess.
12
posted on
12/10/2022 1:25:43 PM PST
by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: Ennis85
Have you ever notice that nearly every bill Congress passes does the opposite of its title?
13
posted on
12/10/2022 1:27:28 PM PST
by
ConservativeInPA
(Stupidly is a moral problem, not an intellectual problem. )
To: ConservativeInPA
What I find funny that at no point does she ever bring up interracial marriage which this bill was also supposedly about.
14
posted on
12/10/2022 1:29:26 PM PST
by
Ennis85
To: Ennis85
I wish her last act was to take a dive down the capitol steps.
To: Ennis85
She means protecting a perversion of marriage being offered by the devil. She’s as much Catholic as I am a Cocker Spaniel.
To: Ennis85
“we must take leadership of course in the crisis of AIDS.”
Says she who has been a rolling crisis for common decency and the American way of life her entire career.
17
posted on
12/10/2022 1:48:22 PM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Ennis85; All
Since neither the word abortion or marriage appear in the Constitution, federal desperate Democrats and RINOs never had the express constitutional power to win votes by unconstitutionally funding the murder of unborn children, or defining marriage for the sovereign states.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In other words, the Supreme Court's decisions in both Roe v. Wade and Obergefell v. Hodges are state sovereignty-ignoring scandals imo.
To: Ennis85
Can’t wait to piss on her grave.
19
posted on
12/10/2022 2:04:30 PM PST
by
maddog55
(The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
To: Ennis85
“Pelosi: I’m proud to protect marriage as one of my last acts as speaker”
Says the devout Catholic. So Pelosi, doesn’t your Bible condemn the homosexual life style. Maybe that is like killing babies. It’s forgivable as long as a priest waves his hands over you abd sends you off to Heaven when you die.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson