Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2023 2:18:31 PM PDT by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: babygene

You have the right to live with people who believe in freedom, justice and rule of law. Separate.


2 posted on 04/01/2023 2:21:09 PM PDT by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Strange that a man with his wealth would have to resort to prostitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Secession.


3 posted on 04/01/2023 2:25:39 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

The correct spelling is secession.

The Founders would agree that the present government “ denies those rights “.

It is despotic, and does not represent the will of anyone but the elitists.

Deo Vindice !!!


5 posted on 04/01/2023 2:27:40 PM PDT by BrexitBen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Just fyi: Image isn’t showing.


9 posted on 04/01/2023 2:34:48 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Can you do it if you can’t spell it?

If you dissolve the United States “They” win. Their next step will be to take over whatever you have left, and if you can’t keep what you have now how will you keep what you have left?

I don’t believe the map drills down far enough. There is a lot of purple at the county/precinct level. Any civil war won’t be state against state, it will be neighbor against neighbor. It will be more like the Irish Troubles than the American War Between The States.


10 posted on 04/01/2023 2:35:30 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

The Declaration of Independence was followed by the War for Independence.

Secession would lead to war, as it did in 1861.

Further, you need a Robert Morris to finance secession.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Morris_(financier)

Robert Morris Jr. (January 20, 1734 – May 8, 1806) was an English-born merchant and a Founding Father of the United States. He served as a member of the Pennsylvania legislature, the Second Continental Congress, and the United States Senate, and he was a signer of the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the United States Constitution. From 1781 to 1784, he served as the Superintendent of Finance of the United States, becoming known as the “Financier of the Revolution.” Along with Alexander Hamilton and Albert Gallatin, he is widely regarded as one of the founders of the financial system of the United States.

...

Morris’s shipping firm was just one of many such firms operating in Philadelphia, but Willing Morris & Company pursued several innovative strategies. The firm pooled with other shipping firms to insure vessels, aggressively expanded trade with India, and underwrote government projects through bonds and promissory notes.[11] Ships of the firm traded with India, the Levant, the West Indies, Spanish Cuba, Spain, and Italy. The firm’s business of import, export, and general agency made it one of the most prosperous in Pennsylvania. In 1784, Morris, with other investors, underwrote the voyage of the ship Empress of China, the first American vessel to visit the Chinese mainland.


12 posted on 04/01/2023 2:37:55 PM PDT by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Our Founders thought they’d limited gov’t enough to protect our freedom. They didn’t. Red States are not as red as they should be. As an Idaho resident I can speak to that.

I look at the current situation & don’t know what would possibly make a difference. An Article V Convention has its drawbacks, & it also has its possibilities. But I don’t think it would be taken far enough to really limit FedGov. And the states individually need limits to powers as well. We are always going to be fighting people with too much money & either ill intentions or misguided good intentions.


14 posted on 04/01/2023 2:41:36 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene; freedomjusticeruleoflaw; DIRTYSECRET
The Constitution would not have been ratified if James Madison, who was unequaled in among delegates for scholarship of political organizations, had not with others supported positions that states retained sufficient sovereignty to secede as the last resort to a political impasse created by perceived usurpations or abuses of the federal government. He believed the transcendent law of nature demanding the right of self-preservation declared the safety and happiness of society must dominate political institutions and require their sacrifice. This point was emphasized by the fact the perpetual relationship language binding the colonies and colonists in the Articles of Confederation did not carry over into the Constitution. The point was also emphasized by the fact the Treaty of Paris ending the revolution was signed between Great Britain and the individual colonies as sovereign states and not with the Continental Congress.

In the final days before the Civil War, heated opinions did or did not advocate the right of secession, but none could point to specific language in the Constitution, Federalist Papers, or James Madison’s notes to the Constitutional debates of 1787 saying states could not secede. Instead, one found language supporting peaceful secession.

However, as he took office Lincoln was determined to preserve the Union and in his inaugural address said, “In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors. You have no oath registered in Heaven to destroy the government, while I shall have the most solemn one to "preserve, protect, and defend it."

Finally, though, disunion was determined by the Southern states, and most particularly South Carolina’s, violent seizure, and destruction of federal property at Fort Sumter independent of any formal or covert discussions of political proprieties.

15 posted on 04/01/2023 2:44:20 PM PDT by Retain Mike ( Sat Cong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Build political and combat power.

Dinner tables, to living rooms, to patios, to campfires, to county-level rendezvous. All across the nation. Red, White, and Blueprint on steroids. There would have to be a platform to pull everyone together, cross all platforms, united under a single compact.

The only other option is to enjoy the ride all the way down to the destruction of the republic.

But every conservative with a platform wants to cash in and make money, the Tea Party has shot is wad, and we like our entertainment, normalcy bias, and addictions.

So the rub is, it will never happen. Let’s enjoy the ride until the US dollar loses world reserve currency status (in the works).


22 posted on 04/01/2023 2:59:08 PM PDT by Salvavida ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

US acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

— Communist goal #1
I see people still think the US is ideologically split by region, and that the left can be appeased by a form of land-for-peace when the left wants the whole thing—that is why they set their sights on DC first and worked their way down.

Reagan knew that the left can never be appeased, even in the faraway USSR, hence the arms race that succeeded for a time (until the left here undid the results). Splitting the country up results in two antagonists sharing a border, and war becomes inevitable.
26 posted on 04/01/2023 3:14:10 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

If we had some kind of secession, the leftist faction would go with much of the rest of the nations in this world except for maybe Israel to the United Nations and call for boycotts, embargos, and even sanctions against the right leaning breakaway. We would be treated much the same way Rhodesia was in 1965 when they declared independence from Britain.


28 posted on 04/01/2023 3:47:55 PM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

What image????


29 posted on 04/01/2023 4:00:56 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Wow. Start off a thread with a title with total misspelling of the proper word with a misspelled homonym. Which was the key word.


30 posted on 04/01/2023 4:06:49 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene; rockrr; BroJoeK
Jefferson Davis and his government did want to break off all the slaveholding territories. That would have left Washington DC surrounded, Philadelphia threatened, and the Confederacy not far from Lake Erie and able to divide the US in half. It would also have subjected many Unionists to Confederate rule. The Confederacy also demanded all US property within their boundaries. Given those demands, war was probably unavoidable.

Secession isn't going to work. People are going to be crossing boundaries everyday and going through customs every day. Goods crossing the border will be held up, inspected, and taxed. The ports would all be in the hands of the blue counties. Red counties and blue counties will fight over land and resources, and the dividing lines will run through most counties, not between them. Red counties will develop industries of their own, reduplicating what already exists on the other side, and the more the red counties invite corporations in the more they become like the blue counties. The result will be a lower standard of living and more aggravation all around. We won't know how much we benefitted from being part of the United States until we have lost it.

43 posted on 04/01/2023 5:48:25 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

Secession needs to be state by state, not county by county.


46 posted on 04/01/2023 5:51:18 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

“The withdrawal of a State from a league has no revolutionary or insurrectionary characteristic. The government of the State remains unchanged as to all internal affairs. It is only its external or confederate relations that are altered. To term this action of a Sovereign a ‘rebellion’ is a gross abuse of language.”


“Secession belongs to a different class of remedies. It is to be justified upon the basis that the States are Sovereign. There was a time when none denied it. I hope the time may come again, when a better comprehension of the theory of our Government, and the inalienable rights of the people of the States, will prevent any one from denying that each State is a Sovereign, and thus may reclaim the grants which it has made to any agent whomsoever.”


Jefferson Davis


49 posted on 04/01/2023 5:58:27 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

If you’re going to post a vanity with a graphic, at least make it so we can see the graphic. Am I the only one who cannot see it?


70 posted on 04/03/2023 3:18:30 PM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson