Posted on 07/29/2023 5:08:41 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
60 miles in one minute would be 3,600 miles per hour
All science may not be settled, but certain things are. Just like there is truth and falsehoods. Thrush is truth, settled. Laws of nature are settled, despite enthusiasm for Hollywood inspired futures. Laws of gravity, settled. Planetary and orbital motion, settled. Newton’s laws, settled. Conservation of momentum, settled.
Claims were made by one witness--a former official with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the NRO--in the hearing on Wednesday of tangible evidence of a non-human vehicle that is to be presented to Congress in a SCIF. Yep, that's outrageous, but that's what's in the testimony.
Sounds like a Bum-Fight!;-)
My bad, sorry. But I still don’t see anything here that can’t be explained by some very good ECM.
They identify the shape of the object,has anyone provided an estimate of the SIZE of the objects?
““For those who don’t realize, above 80,000 feet is space,” Fravor said “
Well, we can discount his expertise since space is 300,000 feet.
There are plenty of decent videos available showing these things.
I am not concluding what they are or where they are from…I am merely saying if you really want to see what the talk is about…the evidence is freely available.
I nominate the squirrel.
Unless I know the individual personally, I would have to assume they are part of the machine that serves the DS and not the constitution.
“ had this discussion with someone yesterday, would disclosing proof of extraterrestrials cause a worldwide panic, my feeling and our general consensus is that it would not cause any panic at all.”
I don’t think it’s panic that is their concern. I think “people” would be pissed off. What they would be angered over is “frictionless” transportation and “free energy.”
Wars have been fought for decades over energy. The Middle East is “significant” because of energy. If we did not need Saudi oil (and their investment in US Treasuries) would anyone care about the Middle East? Knowing we can move frictionless from point A to B, how quickly would our energy economy shift?
Free energy at the levels required to move like this could free entire continents. Imagine using this energy to heat, cool, and desalinate water in Africa?
Yeah, people panicking would not be the issue. The economic and moral outrage about this being available for “70 years” and kept secret would ruin a lot of people who don’t want to be ruined.
I think that’s why we aren’t being told.
While they might want to eat Joe…that would be like eating a shoe.
An advanced tech civilization would not consider us any more interesting than we do an ant farm.
“However, if they are real, informing the public at large would undoubtedly cause world wide mass hysteria.”
Our government loves nothing more than creating hysteria in the public. So it’s not real, or they’re hiding it for their own selfish reasons.
I guess if you said the same thing in the 1500’s a lot of what we do today would be considered witchcraft.
Paradigm shifts happen all the time. We adjust and move on.
See my #72.
Not really, just that in the 1500’s, these laws hadn’t been investigated. People thought the earth was the center of the universe out of self indulgence, not science. God gave us brains to explore his universe and understand the laws of the universe He created. There are still many mysteries God has left for us to understand, but many we have come to theorize, understand, and ultimately prove. When we think we see something that exists outside of those laws, it’s incumbent upon us to investigate what we might have observed incorrectly before we trash what we know to be true.
Making 90 degrees turns at high space is instantaneous changes in velocity that defy not only our technology and physics, but due to the g’s would kill any living creature were it possible. But UFO enthusiasts would have us believe that’s what we see. In fact, most of this stuff is sensor artifacts, code or hardware defects that clutter the screen. The only mystery about it is caused by the military not wanting the enemy to know such glitches exist so that they can’t be exploited in an attack.
“You can’t defy laws of nature.”
The “laws of nature” are in fact laws created by humans in their attempt to understand in nature.
What did scientists say the “laws of nature” were in 1723.
Your post is what I call “straightjacket science”—folks who believe science’s job is to freeze thinking in the current paradigm.
All great scientific thinkers had exactly the opposite view—they believed science laid a foundation for future discovery.
I used to think the same— people would lose their collective minds if we had actual contact with an interstellar species. I have to say, though, that I almost think now the response might be “Yeah, so?”
In the 1800s every serious scientist believed man could never fly like birds.
They did the best they could with the information they had—it was not their fault they were in error.
What was unforgivable were those scientists who ridiculed anyone who thought such flight was possible.
Good scientists encouraged their students to keep working on future discoveries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.