Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I'm not endorsing every attitude or statement found in the article. I do note that in the early 90s our medical regime in DC changed. The CDC initiated a 401c3 and accepted donations, with primary sources of funds being Bill Gates and George Soros, along with many pharmas.

The NIH also has a 401c3 started in the 90s but little information was available online about it.

By that time, the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 had already put Pharma in bed with (profiting with) the FDA and it's how Fauci and others were able to personally profit from patents on products created with taxpayer funds.

These agencies are not independent and appear to serve entirely different agendas and people.

I don't recommend throwing out the baby with the bathwater, but I do see a struggle for control between contrary interests and the American public. Who should decide what we 'have' to inject into our bodies when we can't trust them?

1 posted on 09/23/2023 8:39:53 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

Agree ransomnote.

But can an argument be made that the most prone to chronic ailments are the most likely to need the vaccination? Thus those showing most chronic diseases would be the vaccinated.

I agree the truth is kept from those who need information to make an educated decision.


2 posted on 09/23/2023 8:45:59 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

I think this just goes to show that the agenda out weighs the power of the Supremes.


3 posted on 09/23/2023 8:48:05 AM PDT by patriot torch (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Sir...
I both thank you and applaud you for posting the entire article.
You are a true freeper ......


4 posted on 09/23/2023 8:55:42 AM PDT by joe fonebone (And the people said NO! The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

COURTS HAVE HISTORICAL BEEN AMEANS OF CIVILIZING SOCIETY BY GIVING A NON-VIOLENT OPTION TO RESOLVE CONFLICT AND GRIEVANCES. JAN 6 WAS AN EXAMPLE OF A DEMONSTRATION AFTER THE COURTS REFUSED TO HEAR THE FACTS ABOUT THE RIGGED ELECTION. THIS CASE IS SIMILAR. NO WHERE TO GO BUT THE GUN LOCKER.


7 posted on 09/23/2023 10:31:06 AM PDT by coalminersson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
I wonder who gave the RX companies immunity...

interesting here:

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-are-pharmaceutical-companies-immune-covid-19-vaccine-lawsuits-1562793

note: 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22,...even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

seems the vaccine was sent to pharmacies with directions & warnings pages blank.

also...

"HHS Secretary Alex Azar invoked PREP in February in response to the pandemic, declaring COVID-19 to be "a public health emergency warranting liability protections for covered countermeasures."

Did Azar declare that in a vacuum? Does PREP say that ? or did Azar declare that? Who did Azure report to ?

Seems the lawsuit should be re-directed. to who? (whom?)
10 posted on 09/24/2023 8:22:24 AM PDT by stylin19a (If people gripped a knife & fork as poorly as they do a golf club, they'd starve to death- Sam Snead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson