Child Nanobot Vaccine

Substack ^ | 9-4-23 | ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD

[Paul46360]

The childhood MMR vaccine is loaded with nanobots. They are so small that on my highest magnification you can barely see them, but they are clearly there. I tried to go up to 4000x with my Oil objective but could not visualize them. I took many videos and if you look at the entirety of the documentation it is clearly stunning. The MMRV vax is supposed to be stored at -56F. Thawed it looks exactly like the C19 bioweapon. Filaments do assemble and large areas of hydrogel clots. Without a cover slip the self assembly is much more visible. This is given to 9 month old babies, then again at 15months, and then at 6 years of age.

[rx]

Merck executives, I hope you enjoy Gitmo.

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting.

[jimwatx]

Hmm at first glance all this stuff sounds crazy but this woman possesses an MD/PhD so I can’t dismiss what she is saying. But what I’ve been reading about various vaccines I would avoid taking any more myself (except a rabies vaccine if bitten by a rabid animal) and wouldn’t recommend most of them for children either outside of a tetanus shot.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Medical Education: Medical Education:

1993 – 1999 – M.D., Doctor of Medicine, Rheinian Westfalian Technical University School of Medicine, Aachen, Germany

1995 – 2001 – Post Graduate Doctoral Thesis/ PhD: Rheinian Westfalian Technical University, School of Medicine, Aachen, Germany, Department of Pathology: Prognostic Value of MIB-1 Immunohistochemical Analysis in Gastric Cancer

[aMorePerfectUnion]

#IN!before exDemonicMother!

[Leaning Right]

The vaccine debate is filled with cranks and frauds on both sides of the issue. This Dr. Mihalcea looks like the real deal. But then again, so did Dr. Fauci (at first).

I sure wish other MDs would take the time to prove (or disprove) what Mihalcea is saying here. Yes, many physicians are compromised by money. But there has to be some cranky old tenured professors of medicine ethical enough to look into this.

Just one report is not enough. As Ronald Regan said, trust but verify.

[ChildOfThe60s]

The last three years have exposed a lot of info that suggests we are involuntary subjects in massive biological experimentation that has been going on for a long time.

This didn’t start with C19.

[struggle]

[Paul46360]

For me she is posting what she is investigating..not supporting.

[takebackaustin]

I see classic Brownian motion, fluid flow, and colloids combining. Nothing saying nanobots. Just because somebody has an MD doesn’t mean they recognise Brownian motion in a microscope slide. Botanist Brown observed it in pollen grains in 1827 and initially thought in was evidence of vitality (living and swimming of the pollen grains) just like this lady. Then he tried it with 100 year old pollen grains and they “swam” just like the fresh ones did, then he showed it with particles of granite, etc so it did not require an active nanobot or pollen grain.

Maxwell, Boltzmann, and Clausius thought correctly that it was a thermal phenomenon and worked on it circa 1860-1880. Einstein explained it quantitatively in 1905.

https://youtu.be/ernnQJwaKTs?si=Vao_WgMTjfjMOc9n

https://www.ge.infn.it/~zanghi/FS/BrownTEXT.pdf

[verum ago]

I see classic Brownian motion, fluid flow, and colloids combining.

Thank you! Was getting ready to post the same.

Anyone who's ever looked at something unfixed in oil or water under sufficiently high magnification with a microscope has seen this exact behavior. It is very easily replicated.

[Organic Panic]

Lost me at “Nanobots.” I seriously doubt any company posesses the capabilities to produce microscopic machinery that do “something” when injected. Let alone power sources, mechanisms, and an AI chip to allow them to do what “they” want them to do.