Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible stellar asterisms carved on a protohistoric stone
Astronomische Nachrichten via Wiley Online Library ^ | First published: 22 November 2023 | Paolo Molaro, Federico Bernardini

Posted on 01/15/2024 10:47:58 AM PST by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Red Badger

An asterism is a pattern of stars that is not a constellation. For instance the Big Dipper is an asterism, part of the constellation Ursa Major. The summer triangle is three bright stars from three constellation prominent in the summer sky.


21 posted on 01/15/2024 11:47:36 AM PST by BigOrangeI (When did we run out of tar and feathers ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BigOrangeI

Thank you for the astigmatism.....................


22 posted on 01/15/2024 11:53:36 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I would think that ‘constellations’ would be changing over time, as the Universe ‘expands’, etc.

How long has it been ‘constant’ in terms of recognizable constellations, for example.

And do those prehistoric carvings show today’s, or the older constellation versions?


23 posted on 01/15/2024 1:20:28 PM PST by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob

Good call. The star with the greatest known proper motion is red dwarf Barnard’s Star, but all stars are moving in this or that direction from our viewpoint (as we move around the Sun and the Sun moves with the Milky Way rotation, etc). The variations in what we call constellations have been very slight in the past 4000 years. During recorded history there have been three different pole stars, but none of them “stay put”, as it were.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris#Role_as_pole_star


24 posted on 01/15/2024 1:27:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cephalopod

My pleasure. The marks were made deliberately, and while I generally take a dim view of archaeoastronomical claims, this looks like a somewhat plausible explanation. :^) As you said, they were thorough.


25 posted on 01/15/2024 1:29:56 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BigOrangeI

I learned something today. Thank you.


26 posted on 01/15/2024 2:18:24 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson