Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

99.97% of US sailors infected with covid did not die; this was known in April 2020
expose-news.com ^ | Jan 20, 2024 | Rhoda Wilson

Posted on 01/22/2024 5:50:30 AM PST by ransomnote

On Sunday, Dr. Paul Alexander published a Substack article in which he stated that the so-called covid pandemic “was a PCR-manufactured, 95% false-positive, 0.05% IFR fraud fake, ‘no asymptomatic spread’ lie of a pandemic; nothing else. All of this pandemic was a lie.”

He used the example of the luxury cruise ship the Diamond Princess and the Theodore Roosevelt aircraft carrier as proof that whatever was circulating was not a new virus. “Something” was always circulating in my opinion, he said.

Referring to the Diamond Princess, he wrote: “The fact that on a ship of 3,700 [passengers], only 19% [of passengers] got infected; an isolated ship, quarantined, no one on or off, initial legacy Wuhan strain, infectious, so-called lethal, with a median or so age of about 70 … that only about 7 died, where elderly couples quarantined to rooms had one person hot covid and died, yet the other had no infection? Elderly? How? Unless their immune systems had ‘seen’ it prior and they had some level of protection.”

You can read Dr. Alexander’s full article HERE.

American freelance journalist Bill Rice Jr., author of the Substack page ‘Bill Rice Jr.’s Newsletter’, commented on Dr. Alexander’s article.  Below we have reproduced Rice’s comment which for those who believe covid is “deadly” gives food for thought.


 

Comment by Bill Rice Jr.

Thanks for mentioning the USS Theodore Roosevelt “case study.” You are right that the PCR tests given to crew members showed about 19 per cent had been infected. But what really floored me was the later antibody study of a sample of crew members that was done in late April 2020.

Those antibody results showed that 60 per cent of the crew had been “previously infected” … based on their positive antibody results. A similar antibody study found a similar percentage of crew members on the Charles de Gaulle French aircraft carrier had been previously infected.

There was also an antibody study of crew members on the smaller USS Kidd destroyer that suggested at least 41 per cent of crew members had been previously infected.

In total, more than 7,000 sailors served on those three naval vessels. From extrapolations of the antibody tests administered to a sample of crew members, I count about 4,200 who tested positive for antibodies or had been “previously infected.” And there was only one reported death among these crew members. This man was 41 and I’m not 100 per cent sure he really died “from” covid, but maybe he really did.

Still, that would give us an Infection Fatality Rate (“IFR”) of approximately 1 in 4,200 on these three ships, which all had major “outbreaks” in the worst-possible “spread” environments.

That gives us an IFR of around 0.03 per cent. In other words, 99.97 per cent of crew members infected by this alleged “deadly” virus … did NOT die.

My takeaway: This virus was NOT “deadly” in the early months of covid … (I actually think it shouldn’t be deadly today because I don’t know why the IFR would later, suddenly, change.)

Did the virus suddenly become more lethal? If so, how?

Of course, I think the vast majority of “covid deaths” (or “all-cause” deaths) were from the iatrogenic protocols and collateral damage from the lockdowns … and the V-word.

The article below might be one of my more “contrarian” articles. I use a thought experiment – estimates on real “early” cases and “early deaths” – to show that this virus wasn’t “deadly” between November 2019 and, say, the first week of March 2020.

This “novel virus” suddenly became dangerous in the spring of 2020 (after the “cold and flu season” and after millions of people had become “sick” with influenza-like illness/covid symptoms.)

Read more: Covid didn’t suddenly become ‘deadly’ in April 2020, Bill Rice Jr.’s Newsletter, 12 January 2024

I’ve identified other curious elements of the USS Roosevelt Antibody Study. For example …

The navy and CDC only tested 382 (of more than 4,000 Roosevelt crew members) with an antibody test. At one point naval officials said they were going to test far more crew members. Why didn’t they do this? They should have actually ordered every crew member to get this test – for “science.”

I suspect if they had given more antibody tests to Roosevelt crew members, investigators would have found even more examples of likely “early cases.”

The antibody study also showed as many as 12 of the AB-positive sailors already had experienced covid symptoms before the ship’s first port-of-call in Vietnam in early March 2020. Sailors self-reported symptoms in a questionnaire they filled out before they gave blood for their antibody tests. Two sailors who tested positive for antibodies self-reported symptoms before the ship left San Diego on 17 January 2020. This suggests these sailors had Covid before the first “confirmed” Covid case in America!

Also, the navy and CDC didn’t even interview the sailors who tested positive. In such interviews, virus investigators could have asked these AB-positive crew members more questions about their symptoms and when they experienced these symptoms. I think this is yet another example of my maxim that public health officials do not investigate that which they do not want to “confirm.”

Also, the “watchdog” press had no curiosity about these eye-opening findings and the conclusions that flow from same.



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: covid; fake; garbagepharmatrolls; garbagesource; military; navy; quackdoctors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2024 5:50:30 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt; datura; Fractal Trader; grey_whiskers; metmom; Jane Long; tatown; Golden Eagle; ...

COVID PING


2 posted on 01/22/2024 5:57:50 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Ransomnote, the death count by April 2020 was super low, partly because so few around the world had gotten infected, so early.

100% of people in April 2000 also did not die of COVID-19. Why is that?

This doesn't seem useful.

3 posted on 01/22/2024 5:58:23 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Excellent article. Thanks for posting.

In before the vax Covidians to claim this is a bunch of horse hockey. (which will only make them look more like the fools than they already do, but that fact seems to escape them)


4 posted on 01/22/2024 6:00:08 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

now... How many died from the vaccine?...


5 posted on 01/22/2024 6:01:23 AM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

It seems like most people did not die from Covid in the first place but rather from medical negligence (stay home, do nothing until you can’t breathe or your lips are turning blue) or malpractice of medical protocol of destroying their lungs by venting them and poisoning them with Remdesivir when the vent isn’t working fast enough.


6 posted on 01/22/2024 6:02:49 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

That’s because most sailors aren’t over 60.


7 posted on 01/22/2024 6:03:34 AM PST by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I have stated this from the start. By April, 2020 there was more than enough data available to show the lockdowns were not needed… they just lied about everything from that point on. Period


8 posted on 01/22/2024 6:04:28 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

More like a coup.


9 posted on 01/22/2024 6:05:00 AM PST by bray (You can tell who the Commies fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

In other words this was a fake “pandemic”. There may have been a “new” virus, but it was no where near as deadly as they claimed, certainly not as deadly that required the steps taken to “control it”. Instead it was just a Mcguffin to be used by authoritarian governments to see how much they could control their citizens.

The fact that it was also used to interfere in the 2020 election was, well a bonus for them.


10 posted on 01/22/2024 6:06:36 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Covid could kill you the same way the Flu kills you. You stay in bed until you get pneumonia. Initially, Covid killed you because your body couldn’t fight it. I knew people who died very quickly after getting Covid when it first came out.


11 posted on 01/22/2024 6:12:37 AM PST by AppyPappy (Biden told Al Roker "America is back". Unfortunately, he meant back to the 1970's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; ransomnote

That’s because most sailors aren’t over 60.


🙃

Well, you obviously didn’t read the entire article.

Passengers on the Princess cruise WERE elderly…and, there was STILL a very low death rate (7 died), per article. ….

… Referring to the Diamond Princess, he wrote: “The fact that on a ship of 3,700 [passengers], only 19% [of passengers] got infected; an isolated ship, quarantined, no one on or off, initial legacy Wuhan strain, infectious, so-called lethal, with a median or so age of about 70 … that only about 7 died, where elderly …


12 posted on 01/22/2024 6:13:50 AM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a conspiracy theory in ‘20 is now fact. Land of the sheep, home of the knaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Remdesivir wasn't even available until after trials with a complete total of 1,000 people, Oct. 2020:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/2021/01/31/remdesivir-covid-coronavirus/?sh=6360956b66c2

Healthy, young people just didn't die, in 2020 or 2023, from COVID.

However, if you were healthy and young and died in a car crash, you died of COVID, even when not tested. The CDC let medical professionals label any death COVID if any medical staffer thought it was possible that they had COVID.

The whole reporting thing was a complete sham, including the use of PCR tests, with up to 40 amplification cycles. People who eventually got the vaccine were only cycled 28 times, as I recall.

13 posted on 01/22/2024 6:17:02 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled 99.97% of US sailors infected with covid did not die; this was known in April 2020, ConservativeMind wrote:
Ransomnote, the death count by April 2020 was super low, partly because so few around the world had gotten infected, so early.

100% of people in April 2000 also did not die of COVID-19. Why is that?

This doesn't seem useful.

The Diamond Princess was supposedly identified as having infected COVID patients in a closed system. Close quarters, standing in line or packed in social gatherings without masks andno social distancing. If Covid really was 'Covid' as described, the Diamond Princess was a useful petri dish and should have had high death rate.

Prior to April 6, 2020, the CDC only had a fake test for influenza. Then on April 6, 2020 the CDC began shipping it's fake test for 'Covid' " to select qualified U.S. and international laboratories. Distribution of the tests will help improve the global capacity to detect and respond to the 2019 novel coronavirus."

That new PCR test was not based on (referencing) the virus supposedly responsible for 'Covid,' but was instead based on a 'related corona virus' because the CDC claimed the Covid virus was 'not available.' (note: Fauci et. al. said there were no viruses related to Covid and that's why we needed lockdowns and vaccines)

So starting April 6, a new PCR also not able to identify the Covid virus was implemented. From there it was just a question of defining how 'Covid' deaths were 'diagnosed' or recorded as cause of death (persons dying of cancer were to be recorded as dying of 'Covid'). All smoke and mirrors

https://emergency.cdc.gov/newsletters/coca/020620.htm

Retrospective analysis shows the deathrate was 'normal' for 2020 and conspiculously elevated when the 'vaccines' were released.

Pretending that there was ever anything normal or standard operating procedure for 'Covid' is not helpful.

 


14 posted on 01/22/2024 6:17:29 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Take it easy on the Vax Covidians. They are like time share owners who keep trying to convince themselves it was the right thing to do.

EC


15 posted on 01/22/2024 6:18:57 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I reference that PCR testing and presumed COVID-infected car crash death, in post #13.

It was a sham.

Thank you, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx, you disgusting examples of humans.


16 posted on 01/22/2024 6:21:10 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I’m sorry I misunderstood your post.


17 posted on 01/22/2024 6:28:03 AM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I recall the same about the PCR tests.

The fact that so much deceit was employed concerning the death rates for Covid, tells me that it really wasn’t that lethal. They just needed to make it look that way to push the lockdowns and vote by mail fraud.


18 posted on 01/22/2024 6:31:46 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; ConservativeMind

I did, too, because I read CM’s post #3 the same way.

That was the way it came across to me.


19 posted on 01/22/2024 6:35:03 AM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

An acquaintance who works at a funeral home received a body to process. On the cause of death sheet “covid” was listed as COD.
He is unzipped the body bag to start the procedure and noticed a bullet wound to the head.
He called the ME and asked why it was not listed as suicide.
We get $9,000 for each death listed as covid, zero for a self inflicted gunshot, was the answer.
Primary cause of death Covid. Secondary cause gunshot wound.
I kid you not!!


20 posted on 01/22/2024 6:37:43 AM PST by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson