Posted on 01/23/2024 9:57:41 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
WHY is the US Congress involved with creating a bill called “Disease X Act” back in June of 2023?
Why has this slipped totally UNDER THE RADAR!!?
US Congress Disease X Act of 2023
Disease X is the mystery contagion that the WEF is having a meeting about on January 17th, 2024 that they say “could have 20 times more fatalities than COVID”
The origins of Disease X go ALL the way back to 2018, in an article from the WEF.
This is not a coincidence!
You better believe this is PRE-PLANNED, and they are working on bringing this SICK plan to fruition. What is the plan though?
Is this SMOKING GUN PROOF of NEFARIOUS Government COLLUSION with the WEF and the WHO?
Remember, THEY ALWAYS TELL YOU WHAT IS COMING.
It’s up to YOU to BELIEVE IT, and PREPARE FOR IT.”
If you ever consider looking up what it says, here is the link…
(Excerpt) Read more at strangesounds.org ...
Anyone recognize this Bill Sponsors…?
Mrs. Trahan (for herself, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Crenshaw, and Ms. Lee of Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
“To establish a program at BARDA for developing medical countermeasures for viral threats with pandemic potential.”
It’s already Covid times twenty, even though it doesn’t exist yet.
Amazing they know the lethality of something not in existence…
That is not a prediction. It is a project goal.
Get ready for lockdown, vaccinations, global depression, and WWIII all at once.
“It’s already Covid times twenty, even though it doesn’t exist yet.”
I would wager money that it does in fact already exist, probably it is just not in the wild
Oh, please. Organizations always war game the future. You have to name your adversary something to play the game. “Disease X” is just the name of the adversary in the public health war gaming exercise. If they weren’t planning for future pandemics and the arise of unknown diseases, they would be derelict in their duties.
I would not take that bet.
Crenshaw, Mr Blinky McEyepoke.
Mr “I opposed red flag laws” while simultaneously voting for same.
Just waiting for the best launch date. Evil turds of bass.
Don’t worry. A “savior” will emerge to cure us of all ills. All he will require is your obedience. If you wish to buy/sell or exist, it will be at his behest. A religious and political hero will he be.
P
Just like Event 201, huh?
Here’s one for ya:
What if DAVOS is a gathering for the purpose of inoculating elites against ‘x’???
That.
Exact same thing.
"WHY is the US Congress involved with creating a bill called “Disease X Act” back in June of 2023?"
Patriots are reminded that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to dictate INTRAstate healthcare policy, Obamacare unconstitutional imo, including no power to dictate healthcare policy, or taxing and spending in the name of stopping the spread of diseases.
"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"Many are the exercises of power reserved to the States wherein a uniformity of proceeding would be advantageous to all. Such are quarantines, health laws [emphasis added], regulations of the press, banking institutions, training militia, etc., etc." —Thomas Jefferson to James Sullivan, 1807.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"They form a portion of that immense mass of legislation, which embrace every thing in the territory of a state not surrendered to the general government. Inspection laws, quarantine laws, and health laws [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state, and others, which respect roads, fences, &c. are component parts of state legislation, resulting from the residuary powers of state sovereignty. No direct power over these is given to congress, and consequently they remain subject to state legislation, though they may be controlled by congress, when they interfere with their acknowledged powers." —Justice Joseph Story, Article I, Section 10, Clause 2, 1833.
“Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass.” —Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln., 1837.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Below are excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions and congressional record that don't mention quarantine, but support the constitutional reality that healthcare issues, politically correct (imo) mandating of masks argued to slow spread of contagious diseases for example, is a state power issue, not the business of the feds.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the congressional record, clarification by Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment:
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
“Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously beyond the power of Congress [emphases added].” –Linder v. United States, 1925.
Patriots, we need to support hopeful Trump 47 with a new Constitution-respecting Congress that will support Trump in surrendering state powers that the very corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds have been stealing from the states for the last 100+ years back to the states.
Thanks. Great writeup.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.