Posted on 02/23/2024 4:35:12 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Up until now, most of the research exposing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” as dangerous – and exposing those who take them as disease and death spreaders – has come from independent sources. Now, the truth is coming from the federal government and Big Tech.
It took the sleuthing public, including the diligent truth-seekers at the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) advocacy group, a while to find all this, but we now know from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) itself that mRNA gene therapy products like those manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna do, in fact, shed onto others from those who take them.
A 2015 FDA document called “Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria-Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products” defines shedding as “the release of [viral or bacterial gene therapy products] … from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).”
The same document goes on to explain, according to the FDA, what gene therapy products are:
“All products that mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material.”
Since both the mRNA injections for COVID and adenovirus vaccines fall into this category, this is a clear-cut admission from the FDA itself that people who are “fully vaccinated” for COVID shed these poisons onto others through contact or close proximity, vindicating independent researchers who have been warning about this threat for years.
(Related: Research published last summer in Infectious Diseases Research shows that the fully vaccinated are walking bioweapons factories spreading mRNA poisons to others.)
At a recent FLCCC conference in Phoenix, Dr. Pierre Kory delineated on the shedding phenomenon and the risks involved. Unfortunately for those who get shed on, the fully jabbed are contaminating others with spike proteins and other deadly jab components that are now being found in breast milk. And the threat can last for at least half a year after a person gets injected, meaning the risk of shedding is not just a temporary thing that lasts a few days as some claim.
“Shedding is unfortunately real,” Dr. Kory stated at the conference. “The FDA knows that.”
The FDA continues to deny all this, having issued a statement to The Epoch Times claiming that COVID jabs “are not regulated as gene therapy products,” thus making the guidance document previously cited “not applicable to the COVID-19 vaccines.” It does not stop there, though.
As Dr. Kory also explained, Pfizer’s own literature likewise explains that participants in its COVID injection trials risk spreading the poisons to others around them through inhalation or skin contact. Pfizer described this risk using the following two examples of potential “environmental exposures:”
“A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued [vaccine] intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”
“A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the [vaccine] intervention through inhalation or skin contact.”
There is also the risk of “secondary shedding,” which occurs when someone who gets shed on through environmental exposure by someone who got fully vaccinated then sheds it a second time to someone else.
“An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention (the vaccine) by inhalation or skin contact,” Pfizer’s internal documents further admit, warning about adverse effects that could arise from these “indirect exposures.”
Where is Arthur "two sheds" Jackson when we need him?
“Get your own Arts programme, you fairy!”
Evil never sleeps.
Never stops.
Never backs away ...
Pandemic X ... ya ... I think we will see it.
Not exactly on topic but whatever happened with J&J? Disappeared and I never hear anything pro or con.
Even I thought shedding was a
little Clazy...
I also wonder. I had the J&J vax in Apr 2020. My sister was immune compromised and panicked, so I waited for JJ. All I know about it is that it was not gene therapy. Guess it had to be killed.
My daughter has a massage therapist. She is unvaccinated but was having problems with her health, from people who got the shot. She finally had to put out an email saying anyone who got the shot needed to wait 30 days before making an appointment.
To answer your question on the J&J...
https://www.hematology.org/covid-19/vaccine-induced-immune-thrombotic-thrombocytopenia
This article does not address the concentration of vaccine residue in whatever “shedding” occurs. If you take an aspirin your blood concentration of salicylic acid goes up, because it is the main ingredient in aspirin. After you excrete it, it goes into the sewer and from their into a river, etc. The same is true of antibiotics, Xanax, any medicine you take. However the concentration of these medicines in the water you drink is probably 1 million times lower than it was in your blood. If you gave someone a Covid vaccine with a concentration of MRNA 1 million times lower than a full dose, I don’t think it would have much of an effect. Stop the bedwetting, Alex Jones.
My late wife had the J&J. Just seemed safer. (Her death was caused by a condition existing well before Covid.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.