These gifs came to mind.
Posted on 04/13/2024 12:28:10 PM PDT by simpson96
Murder is not a violent crime?
Why from 40yrs ago?
How much current data was bypassed to post that study?
I wouldn’t even know how to find a study from 1985.
Obv more recent data is available.
Nope.
It’s not even in the same ballpark.
That’s like saying 16% of the population commits half the crime as if black infants and the elderly are out murdering people.
It could be cultural. It could also be the cultural Marxists fomenting hate to destroy the country.
Densely packed poor people still commit the most crime.
2019 homicides.
I know the rest are not as disparate just as you most likely knew homicides were the most disparate, robberies being the least.
These numbers are only moving in one direction and it is not towards 1985 as the races are staying further apart not moving within closer proximity.
I may be lacking a lot of information but I didn’t gloss over 40yrs of history and omit the most the violent crime of all.
The Marxists want to destroy the nation with this stuff and I’m not participating.
The size of the population has absolutely nothing at all to do with it.
We could have 10billion blacks or whites and the homicides will still be mostly within the races.
Normalization is the mathematically illiterate part.
I see the problem here-
by conflating murder with all violent crime it was misleading.
That was not my intent although the bottom line still holds even though it is misleading.
At random anyone is more likely to be the victim of violent crime by a person of the same race is true but misleading.
To be clearer and not misleading in the future, I will specifically and exclusively refer to murder alone instead of robbed and murdered or any other variation.
I appreciate you pointing this out. I’m still not participating. Unf I viewed your post with the wrong lens initially suspiciously. Ce la vie.
Yes, they do. If a black is twice as likely as a white person to commit a crime, you’d have to meet twice as many whites as blacks to meet the same number of criminals. If there’s more than twice as many whites as blacks, then you’ll meet more white criminals. And vice versa. Rate and total quantity are different measurements.
Even if the majority or crime is intra-colored, that doesn’t mean any particular individual is more or loss dangerous, without knowing more information. Like rate and quantity.
Go ahead mods, flame away but it's about damn this s**t was called out for what it is— Black racism and violence against Whites and I'm one White dude who's fed up up with it . I can't legally own a fire arm. But a six inch double bladed knife in a scabbard in by back pocket can ‘’make a point’’ if it needed to be done and at my age, 68. jail would be like retirement. Living with these aborigines most of my in North Jersey. Went to Essex Catholic High School in Newark, NJ in 1971.(an all boys school.) and I had my run ins with these punks. Fortuantely I had two older brothers so 'Hmie'. used punked out and slinked away with the usaual ''White bitch, think you bad?'' bs. They're all mouth./p>
Nothing but trouble. Pugnacious, all wise ass's looking to start ‘’wit dem White boys’’.
These Blacks were there because their (Baptist) parents didn't want them going to the crappy Newark public schools so the Christian brothers of Essex catholic took them in.
Hood rats and thugs every one of them. After two years I got out and went to the public high school in the town I grew up in.
About as many times as a woodchuck chucking wood.
Well to be fair Black Ebonics has different dialects. Now for North East Coast pronouns and articles take on and dialects and different pronunciations.
Such as “ He be. She be’’. Dey (they) be’’
Lower form Ebonics would be “M’fer( sorry. Very,Very bad wrd but educational purposes; “m’fer come down hea’ and he be talkin’ s**t and he be like,
Man No body got no time fo da s**t!’’.
As you can see there is High Ebonics, Middle Range as in “Yeah girl! Damn you be lookin’ dope!’’ translated. “Y girl friend you look great in that dress!’’.
And Low Ebonics is the vernacular.
LOL! Oh my God. In this could be a rare and a previously unknown dialect of Ebonics, perhaps a corruption of Classic Lower Ebonics, not common to most known studies.
I propose we ask the Department of Education in DC for a grant and an in depth study to further research this new Ebonics dialect.
I think a...mmmm.. $20 million dollar grant to be satisfactory, do you concur?
These gifs came to mind.
Ah, a colleague. Well as I poisted I’ve identified three main Ebonics Dialects(with a few subsets). These are; 1, High Ebonics. Not confined those geographic urban areas. “Common Ebonics shall we say.
Example, “Yo bro! Wut up dog? Where you be?’’
Translation: “Hey friend, how are you , where have you been lately’’?
2 Middle Ebonics: “Yo (n word) wuts up wit yo ass?’’
Translation ‘’Hwy dude what’s up with you , I have haven’t seen you in ages!’’.
And finally number 3, Low Ebonics” Yo m’fer, why you don’t be callin me , been lookin’ for yo as n word, wut up?’’
Translation: Listen damn it, why haven’t you called me? I’ve been looking all over for you!’’
This is just a basic Ebonics Primer.
Sup?
Dindu nuffins......
“Sup’’? ‘’Ain’t s**t dog’’. Or ‘’Ain’t s**t n*****r’’.
This is an example of the subset of dialects that rang from hood to hood.
Ebonics, while not exactly a new form of American slang and colloquialisms is a pretty well established now in American speech. I suggest we form some sort of Free Republic Commission For The Study Of and Advancement of Ebonics And How It Relates To Modern Day Paradigms Of Diversity, Equity And Inclusion. We could make a ton of money in getting grant money.
I can best translate lower form ebonics. The higher form sounds like a scene out of the original Shaft movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.