Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump v. Clinton recusal failures come back to bite ex-White House policy analyst’s bid to boot Biden-appointed judge from Hunter Biden’s ‘hacking’ suit
Law & Crime ^ | 4/27/24 | Matt Naham

Posted on 04/27/2024 6:50:01 AM PDT by Libloather

A federal judge on Friday declined to force the recusal of a fellow Joe Biden-appointed colleague in Hunter Biden’s “hacking” lawsuit against a former policy analyst in the Trump White House, writing that the effort failed just like the former president failed to remove a Clinton appointee from the never successful Trump v. Clinton RICO case.

U.S. District Judge Hernan Vera was the target of Garrett Ziegler’s recusal motion, which reasoned that Vera’s status as a 2023 appointee of President Joe Biden appointee, coupled with a donation to the president’s 2020 election campaign and the political “subject matter of the litigation,” raised reasonable questions about whether he could be impartial. But Vera was not the one who rendered a decision on recusal. The motion was referred to U.S. District Judge Monica Ramirez Almadani for a ruling, and she agreed with Hunter Biden’s lawyers that former President Donald Trump’s unsuccessful Trump v. Clinton RICO suit recusal bids were “instructive.”

Almadani, also a 2023 Biden appointee, wrote that Ziegler did not “point to any evidence” that Vera had “any connection to any litigant in this case” beyond the fact that he was appointed by President Biden and donated to the Biden campaign in 2020, three years before he was nominated as a federal judge.

Ziegler, failing to show “any evidence of bias stemming from extrajudicial factors,” himself confirmed that Vera’s “appointment and past campaign contributions alone and together do not warrant disqualification,” the judge said. Nor did Ziegler succeed in arguing that the politically charged nature of the case necessarily meant Vera had to step aside.

That’s when Trump v. Clinton came up again.

(Excerpt) Read more at lawandcrime.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: clinton; donaldmiddlebrooks; donaldmmiddlebrooks; garrettziegler; hernanvera; hunter; hunterbiden; judge; monicaalmadani; monicaralmadani; recusal; sdflorida; trumpvclintonrico
Will Brandon judges be deciding on the chicom bribes?
1 posted on 04/27/2024 6:50:01 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A Pres. Biden appointed judge rules that another Pres. Biden appointed judge does not have to recuse because of bias.

Bea-u-ti-ful.


2 posted on 04/27/2024 7:31:24 AM PDT by stylin19a ( Why do "overlook" and "oversee" mean opposite things?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
<>failed to remove a Clinton appointee from the never successful Trump v. Clinton RICO case.<>

Never successful?

Uh, rather than air the merits in open court, the judge tossed Trump's likely airtight case against the criminal Hildebeast.

No republic can long endure two systems of justice.

3 posted on 04/27/2024 12:58:44 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a; Jacquerie
A Pres. Biden appointed judge rules that another Pres. Biden appointed judge does not have to recuse because of bias.

Using the Trump v. Clinton RICO case and Clinton stooge-judge Donald M. Middlebrooks of SD Florida as the excuse.

Uh, rather than air the merits in open court, the judge tossed Trump's likely airtight case against the criminal Hildebeast.

Yes, Clintoon "judge" Donald Middlebrooks throws out a case against ****drumroll**** - Clinton's wife.

No two-tiered system of "justice" here.

Nothing to see - move along.

4 posted on 04/27/2024 4:55:29 PM PDT by kiryandil (what Ukrainian electrical grid doink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
I was wondering why Pres. Trump's folks didn't refile after Durham's report ...

Durham proves that Hillary and the FBI tried to rig the 2016 election
5 posted on 04/27/2024 6:31:36 PM PDT by stylin19a ( Why do "overlook" and "oversee" mean opposite things?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson