Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geology Picture of the Week, April 21-27, 2002
National Aeronautics and Space Administration ^ | April 2002

Posted on 04/24/2002 8:36:45 AM PDT by cogitator

The Bosporus is a strait that connects the Black Sea with the Sea of Marmara in the center of this view of northwest Turkey, taken during the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). The water of the Black Sea at the top of the image and Sea of Marmara below the center are colored blue in this image, along with several large lakes. The largest lake, to the lower right of the Sea of Marmara, is Iznik Lake. The Bosporus (Turkish Bogazici) Strait is considered to be the boundary between Europe and Asia, and the large city of Istanbul, Turkey is located on both sides of the southern end of the strait, visible as a brighter (light green to white) area on the image due to its stronger reflection of radar. Istanbul is the modern name for a city with a long history, previously called Constantinople and Byzantium. It was rebuilt as the capital of the Roman Empire in 330 A.D. by Constantine on the site of an earlier Greek city, and it was later the capital of the Byzantine and Ottoman empires until 1922.

The Gulf of Izmit is the narrow gulf extending to the east (right) from the Sea of Marmara. The city of Izmit at the end of the gulf was heavily damaged by a large magnitude 7.4 earthquake on August 17, 1999, often called the Izmit earthquake (also known as the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake), that killed at least 17,000 people. A previous earthquake under the Gulf of Izmit in 1754 killed at least 2,000 people. The Izmit earthquake ruptured a long section of the North Anatolian Fault system from off the right side of this image continuing under the Gulf of Izmit. Another strand of the North Anatolian Fault system is visible as a sharp linear feature in the topography south of Iznik Lake. Bathymetric surveys show that the North Anatolian Fault system extends beneath and has formed the Sea of Marmara, in addition to the Gulf of Izmit and Iznik Lake. Scientists are studying the North Anatolian Fault system to determine the risk of a large earthquake on the faults close to Istanbul that could kill many more than the 1999 event.

Three visualization methods were combined to produce this image: shading and color coding of topographic height and radar image intensity. The shade image was derived by computing topographic slope in the northwest-southeast direction. Northwest-facing slopes appear dark and southeast-facing slopes appear bright. Color coding is directly related to topographic height, with green at the lower elevations, rising through yellow and brown to white at the highest elevations. The shade image was combined with the radar intensity image to add detail, especially in the flat areas.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: blacksea; bosporus; turkey
Go to

Bosporus Strait and Istanbul, Turkey for the original page and a link to the big (5 MB) version of this image.

1 posted on 04/24/2002 8:36:45 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kayak; Miss Marple; CPT Clay; capitan_refugio
*ping* Sorry I'm late this week.
2 posted on 04/24/2002 8:47:12 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Thanks! I love to look at these pictures!
3 posted on 04/24/2002 8:59:17 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The "blue" of the water looks awfully artificial. It's too consistent. And I'd assume that if color is used to show altitude in this radar image, that lakes would be different colors than the ocean, because of their altitude difference.

I've heard rumors that these radar images penetrate water. And that's their primary usefullness. Shows submarines in the water (ever wonder why we decommissioned SOSUS?). Shows wrecks on the bottom (ever wonder how its been so easy for some people to find specific wrecks lost for decades in the open ocean - hint - sonar hasn't improved that much).

Sure would like to see the original image.

4 posted on 04/24/2002 9:13:20 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
The "blue" of the water looks awfully artificial. It's too consistent. And I'd assume that if color is used to show altitude in this radar image, that lakes would be different colors than the ocean, because of their altitude difference.

I don't know much about the SRTM, but since the water looks very flat, they may not have done anything with radar returns over water and simply analyzed the land data. (The Canadian RADARSAT gets the best radar data over the ocean for waves and ice.)

5 posted on 04/24/2002 9:17:22 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
What I understand is that there are some particular radar wavelenghts that penetrate water just fine. Makes good images of the bottom. The first spacecraft to do this was a JPL scientific mission sometime in the late 70's, early 80's. Forget the name. Was mounted on an Agena body.

It was a non-classified mission, and the first images came out showing the ocean bottoms, and these long cigar shaped thingies floating between the surface and bottom.

Surprise, surprise, surprise.

The first images were relased, but someone quickly realized the national security component, and classified it quick.

6 posted on 04/24/2002 9:22:43 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narby
The mission that fits your recollections is Seasat, but I hadn't heard that it imaged subs. The second link indicates that satellite detection of submarines underwater is impossible. But... anything that they do which causes a surface disturbance would be detectable.

Seasat

Hunting and Hiding in the Deep Blue Sea

7 posted on 04/24/2002 9:45:11 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narby;cogitator
interesting comments narby.

Nifty pics cogitator - I always look forward to them.

8 posted on 04/24/2002 10:38:23 AM PDT by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narby
There's not really an "original image" in the sense that we would normally think.

The data is collected by scanning the earth's surface to produce a "grid" of values that are then converted to the image you see by combining information (e.g. slope, aspect, elevation) to produce an idealized view of the surface.

Because the large water bodies have "zero" elevation and are essentially "flat" they are assigned a consistent color. Thus they appear unrealistic because there is no natural variation in shade. Because I have some experience in this, it is obvious that the whole thing is "unrealistic", but it is a beautiful image nonetheless.

The global digital elevation dataset that came from this program is a gold mine for those in geospatial data analysis fields.

The description (especially the last paragraph) is quite accurate.

Russ

9 posted on 04/24/2002 10:49:14 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: narby
Radar doesn't penetrate water well at all.

LIDAR systems (that use active laser ranging) get about 3-meters of penetration in non-turbid water and has proved useful for characterizing the underwater surfaces nearshore.

Russ

10 posted on 04/24/2002 10:52:01 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
What a neat image! Would you please put me on your 'ping' list? I could use these images in homeschooling!
11 posted on 04/24/2002 11:00:36 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
What a neat image! Would you please put me on your 'ping' list? I could use these images in homeschooling!

I will, but I'll also tell you that the "Earth Observatory" Web site has a new image every day and feature articles about Earth science and remote sensing. Here's the link:

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

I don't always use their images; I look at some current volcano and weather sites too (and this "Geology Picture of the Week" is just for fun anyway), but they have a good variety and frequently spectacular shots.

12 posted on 04/24/2002 1:16:58 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Thanks so much for the link. What a great resource!
13 posted on 04/24/2002 3:47:27 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
I think this the area where Lord Byron swam the Hellespont. (He swam from Sestos to Abydos). It was the same location in which Xerxes constructed his bridge in order to cross into Greece.

Good picture ...

14 posted on 04/24/2002 5:58:21 PM PDT by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The large image was a good exercize for my new Cox cable modem and the new G4 iMac. I failed to time it but I would say 5 minutes or so. You coud certainly see the fault . Also the fishing boats I presume?
15 posted on 04/24/2002 6:58:01 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Speculation is that the Black Sea was a fresh water lake which was flooded by the Mediterranean about 7,600 years ago when the rising sea levels of the warming earth (and possibly an earthquake on the Anitolian Fault) caused the Bosporus Isthmus to fail and a deluge of Sea Water to flow into the Black Sea.

That must have been some river.

16 posted on 04/25/2002 10:56:52 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Speculation is that the Black Sea was a fresh water lake which was flooded by the Mediterranean about 7,600 years ago when the rising sea levels of the warming earth (and possibly an earthquake on the Anitolian Fault) caused the Bosporus Isthmus to fail and a deluge of Sea Water to flow into the Black Sea.

Hey, sorry I'm late to reply to this: I was really busy for the past few days. Anyway, it's better than speculation; geological data pretty much confirms that this happened. It was some river; the stories I've seen indicate that the Black Sea would have been rising about a foot a day.

17 posted on 04/29/2002 7:22:28 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson