Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecution's Bug Expert Struggles On Stand:08/01/2002 Westefield Trial Nears Finish Lap!
Court TV ^ | August 1, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 07/31/2002 9:20:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA

Prosecution's bug expert struggles on stand

Photo
Forensic entomologist Madison Lee Goff, left, testifies for the prosecution at the trial of David Westerfield.

SAN DIEGO — The insect expert prosecutors hoped would destroy David Westerfield's chances for acquittal stumbled badly during his turn on the witness stand Tuesday, capping confusing, overly technical testimony with the admission he made basic math errors in his findings.

Madison Lee Goff, one of the most experienced scientists in the small field of forensic entomology, blushed a deep red as a defense lawyer for the man accused of killing Danielle van Dam repeatedly confronted him with five separate errors in data he used to analyze bugs collected at the 7-year-old's autopsy.

"I made a mistake adding," said Goff, the chair of the forensic science department at Honolulu's Chaminade University and one of only nine certified forensic entomologists in North America.

Entomology has become a battleground as Westerfield's two-month long capital murder trial draws to a close. The strongest evidence for the defense comes from this field in which insect specialists use the age of maggots and flies decomposing a body to help determine a time of death. Danielle, abducted from her bedroom Feb. 1, was missing 26 days and when her body was finally found, the medical examiner was unable to pinpoint when she was killed. Two forensic entomologists hired by the defense said their analyses suggested her body was dumped along a roadside in mid-February, long after Westerfield was under constant police surveillance.

Prosecutors, who have a pile of other evidence against Westerfield, including hair, blood and fingerprint evidence, hired Goff soon after the first defense entomologist testified.

Goff said Tuesday he disagreed with the conclusions of both defense experts, but the time frame he offered, Feb. 9 to Feb. 14, was only slightly earlier than theirs and did not neatly fit the prosecution's theory that Danielle was killed between Feb. 2 and Feb. 4 while Westerfield claims he was on a solo camping trip. Prosecutor Jeff Dusek had to question his own expert in much the same way as he cross-examined the defense experts, hinting that variables in the weather and the disposal of Danielle's body cast doubt on the certainty of any entomological findings.

Goff agreed that very hot, very dry weather conditions in San Diego in February might have mummified Danielle's 58-pound body almost immediately and that flies may not have been attracted to the desiccated body. A forensic anthropologist, called by the prosecution last week to cast doubt on the bug evidence, said the insects may have arrived later and only after coyotes and other animals began scavenging her body and Goff said this scenario seemed possible.

He also said a covering, such as a blanket, might have kept flies at bay initially. No covering was found and Goff later said the longest delay by such a shroud was two and a half days.

Much of his testimony was a detailed view into the mathematical nuts and bolts of his conclusions. Goff did not look at the bugs himself. Instead, he reviewed photos and the reports of the defense experts. He told jurors he came up with four separate time lines based on two different temperatures at two separate locations, a golf course a mile and a half from the crime scene and National Weather Service station farther away.

Goff's testimony bounced between these four sets of findings and even after he said the lower temperature and the weather service station provided the most reliable, appropriate date, it was often unclear which findings he was referring to. He peppered his speech with entomological jargon like "accumulated degree hours" and referred to blowflies by their the Latin names. He talked about temperatures in Celsius degrees, frequently prompting Dusek to ask for a Fahrenheit translation. Much of his work seemed lost on jurors, who stopped taking notes early on in his testimony.

On cross-examination, defense lawyer Steven Feldman grilled him about the way he calculated the day-to-day temperatures which dictate how fast an insect grows. Goff explained the process, but then Feldman handed him a pocket calculator and asked him to review his findings. With the courtroom completely silent, Goff added rows of figures and discovered his errors. Feldman asked him if the mistakes effected the accuracy of his estimates and Goff said they did. Several jurors picked up their notebooks and began writing rapidly.

A few minutes later, under questioning by Dusek, Goff said the slip ups made little difference in the ultimate conclusions. And as he had earlier in his testimony, he emphasized to jurors that his was an extremely narrow study of bugs, not a "stopwatch" for determining time of death.

"We're establishing a minimum period of time the insects have been feeding on the body," said Goff.

"Are you establishing a time of death?" asked prosecutor Jeff Dusek.

"No, that's outside our area of expertise," said Goff.

Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, watched most of the testimony from the back row of the courtroom, occasionally flinching as Goff described the condition of their daughter's remains.

The prosecution rested its rebuttal case after Goff's testimony. There will be no witnesses Wednesday and the defense will put on its sur-rebuttal case Thursday. Closing arguments could happen as early as next Monday.

Also Tuesday, a lab technician testified that orange clothes some law enforcement officers wore when searching Westerfield's house were not the source of fibers found in both the defendant's home and in Danielle's necklace.

The trial is being broadcast live on Court TV.



TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: bugguys; daniellevandam; davidwesterfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,041-1,044 next last
To: shezza
666

It figures, someone who always talks to themselves would end up 666. ;-)
Psssssst! don't say anything but I found myself doing it a couple of times.

681 posted on 08/01/2002 2:35:47 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
180 Frank directed the dogs on the leash to where he wanted them to go.
682 posted on 08/01/2002 2:36:45 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies]

To: shezza; UCANSEE2
Is it true that their female bugologist colleauge's report supports the prosecution stance? (Just heard it on ctv)
683 posted on 08/01/2002 2:37:28 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Who handled the german shepard?
684 posted on 08/01/2002 2:38:15 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; All
I take back every nice thing I ever said about Catherine Crier and CTV.. She is positively "giddy" saying that this witness broke the case wide open pin-pointing that Danielle's body indeed could have been deposited Feb 4th.

Win, lose or draw, no more Court TV for me after this trial.

sw

685 posted on 08/01/2002 2:39:36 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

Comment #686 Removed by Moderator

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"The so called "DW groupies" are really kind of biased against dusek aren't they."

You know, Kim. You wrote me an e-mail about how you NEVER flame others, how good you are. You are wrong. You post as many inflamatory items as anyone else. This is a case in point. Huggz, kissez, barf.
687 posted on 08/01/2002 2:40:52 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I didn't watch it before this trial and AM ONLY watching it because of this trial when real audio doesn't work or whatever. TV is not my favorite thing to do....anyway.
688 posted on 08/01/2002 2:41:42 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

Comment #689 Removed by Moderator

To: kayti
You mean you didn't fall for that innocent act? Group HUGGZ! sw
690 posted on 08/01/2002 2:43:23 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Yeah, okay, whatever. Just shoot me. They're saying the same thing on the SanDiego Channel.
691 posted on 08/01/2002 2:45:27 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

The so called "DW groupies" are really kind of biased against dusek aren't they.

I think in my case, it's more a state of DISGUST & DISMAY watching somebody trying to railroad an innocent man. JMO Even if the jury brings back a Not Guilty verdict, the man is still ruined financially now and into the future.

692 posted on 08/01/2002 2:45:29 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I just tuned in, per our discussion this morning. What is she talking about? I've been gone all day.
693 posted on 08/01/2002 2:47:03 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Feldmen's turn.
694 posted on 08/01/2002 2:48:55 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Dead?
695 posted on 08/01/2002 2:49:54 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
Feldi, calm, cool, collected. No prancing and no shrieking. The headache is receding.... Blood pressure is lowering..... OOOOOMmmmmmm
696 posted on 08/01/2002 2:51:10 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: BARLF
Yup, as a doornail. Girls are safe though.
697 posted on 08/01/2002 2:51:55 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: kayti; JudyB1938
Oh MY GOSH, I did not say NEVER. LOL!

Re: Prosecution's Bug Expert Struggles On Stand:08/01/2002 Westefield Trial Nears Finish Lap! To kayti | 2002-08-01 13:10:30 sent
I hope you don't mind, I didn't want it to get "worse" on the thread than it already is. I think that since that site was created, the flames have reduced considerably and I've really glad. I got flamed the first time i posted on the threads and it hasn't stopped from what some call the core groupies. Yes, I know I fought back....but am trying my best to not now...ever since the mods let me and mizs get back on..I've TRIED REAL HARD. :) Thanks, Kim

When ya'll start tellin your own to stop, then the credibility will increase. What's pretty sad., they can call us jackals and vda's (HA HA HA RIGHT?) I said "so called" to make the ease of pointing out quicker. It does NOT mean I believe it. (sorry judy..had to say it)

JudyB1938, I have no problems with those of you who have developed an opinion as to whether he is guilty or not. You've kept an open mind and you've been one of the most fair on the threads.

698 posted on 08/01/2002 2:52:35 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kimmie, before I leave for the day..... I'd just like to let you know I really don't wish to be called a groupie. It's so, so bar-flyish sounding to me. I want to be called a Stealth Ninja Freedom Fighter.

See y'all later. Take good notes. The road calls...
699 posted on 08/01/2002 2:56:00 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

Comment #700 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 661-680681-700701-720 ... 1,041-1,044 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson