Just what are Dusek's qulifications for attacking this science? I thought he was a lawyer.
Dusek will be given an opportunity to "explain" a scenario. His scenario will be based on his selection of the evidence and testimony that was provided to the jury.
I believe he has drawn out sufficent testimony from all the bug guys that will allow him to demonstrate that the bug science is not absolute, that the bug guys established only minimum times and that no one can know how long she was there.