Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dixie Chicks Pose Nude to Answer Critics
Reuters ^ | 4/24/03 | unknown

Posted on 04/24/2003 8:12:19 AM PDT by joy361

Edited on 05/07/2004 5:21:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Dixie Chicks, Emily Robison, left, Natalie Maines, center, and Martie Maguire, say they are posing nude to make a point.

NEW YORK - The Dixie Chicks appear nude on the cover of a weekly showbiz magazine in a defiant answer to a backlash over their opposition to the war in Iraq.


(Excerpt) Read more at azcentral.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: wardaddy
I was in a colegues place of business, there was this woman who was "butch" and she had blixie chix pictures posted right next to her WNBA schedule. Anther fan base "dedicated" to women.
162 posted on 04/24/2003 10:10:46 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
I'm not sure if I should be impressed or disturbed that you noticed this.
163 posted on 04/24/2003 10:18:33 AM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
I think that some series digital alterations ...

Yeah. It's hugh!

164 posted on 04/24/2003 10:26:46 AM PDT by Martin Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
What...no Indigo Girls?
165 posted on 04/24/2003 10:29:23 AM PDT by wardaddy (Hootie (not of Blowfish) to head EEOC...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Ohhhh I just have to rant about this!!! If I see this garbage at the store I am going to make a point to tell the manager to put this issue behind the counter where it can't be seen by kids! Dixie Chicks or not, magazines with covers like this need to be in X-rated protective packaging. If I see it while standing in line at the grocery I will turn it around so the back cover is displayed. I am sick to death of seeing this kind of filth out in the open where people like me don't have a choice of viewing it or not! If I had kids I would not feel comfortable taking them inside a grocery store where they could see this crap. Put this issue behind the counter with the Playboys and the Hustlers! GRRRRRR!
166 posted on 04/24/2003 10:33:02 AM PDT by Ferret Fawcet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Nice Tatoos
167 posted on 04/24/2003 10:34:01 AM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joy361

Ain't NO way that is Natalie Maines' body on the EW cover.

168 posted on 04/24/2003 10:42:09 AM PDT by TexRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
"That ain't chunky chicks body."

That ain't any of their bodies. It's a cartoon. I don't suppose anyone wanted to see their actual bodies.

169 posted on 04/24/2003 10:42:16 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I only saw one side in passing. (I was picking up a file) Her lyfestyle was apparent. Of course I might be wrong but I seriously doubt it. For homosexual lurkers, she did hand the file in a most professional manner without reference to her lifestyle choice. (sarcasm off)
170 posted on 04/24/2003 10:45:15 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Ferret Fawcet
Good point. This is actually MORE revealing than the covers of a playboy. Truthfully more publicity is good for the chix and the magazine. Our energies are better served setting up protests infront of concerts and staying away from lipton.
171 posted on 04/24/2003 10:47:48 AM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: linn37
thinks Jesus would tell Nat to keep her clothes on.....

LOL.

I wish I had thought to say that.

172 posted on 04/24/2003 10:58:54 AM PDT by legman ("If God is for us, who can be against us?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: joy361
This has to be a joke.
173 posted on 04/24/2003 11:07:51 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
Maybe not----- clothes seem to make her look so much heavier ----she looks like a size 18 with clothes and a size 12 without them.
174 posted on 04/24/2003 11:09:07 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: TexRef
Hell that ain't Natalie Mains face on that cover.
175 posted on 04/24/2003 11:09:29 AM PDT by wordsofearnest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
what are they, whores who sing?
176 posted on 04/24/2003 11:09:38 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joy361; martin_fierro
Comment #2 and #3 were removed.. they were the offending photo. What, too porno for FR? lol (not a dig on the moderators, just kind of a funny turn of events)
177 posted on 04/24/2003 11:12:43 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
in CYA mode

A rather inapt description of this photo, to be sure.

178 posted on 04/24/2003 11:25:31 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: lainie
Their websites are full of images orchestrated to make them appear as victims and mommies. I await NOW's press release at any moment: 'conservatives refuse family-values country music group for not towing party line'




179 posted on 04/24/2003 11:29:34 AM PDT by lainie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
I'm not sure if I should be impressed or disturbed that you noticed this.

At first, I just thought they had fat twins there.

180 posted on 04/24/2003 11:43:04 AM PDT by saminfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson