To: PrairieFireConservative
A total waste of money. We need that in winnable districts, not one where the GOP candidate gets 10% in a good year.
10 posted on
04/20/2010 4:48:18 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: fieldmarshaldj
A total waste of money. We need that in winnable districts, not one where the GOP candidate gets 10% in a good year. Disagree with you. With this attitude, Croakley would have won the Senate seat.
12 posted on
04/20/2010 8:01:59 PM PDT by
JimWayne
To: fieldmarshaldj
A total waste of money. We need that in winnable districts, not one where the GOP candidate gets 10% in a good year.
Couldn't disagree with you more on that point. Perhaps in other districts with Congress-monkeys who are a little less front-and-center in the fascist seizure of power, but in this district, it's money well, well spent.
17 posted on
04/20/2010 9:04:14 PM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: fieldmarshaldj
“A total waste of money. We need that in winnable districts, not one where the GOP candidate gets 10% in a good year.”
Agreed.
Off the top of my head, I can think of at least five races (special elections not included) where that type of money could be put to better use.
32 posted on
04/21/2010 7:44:18 PM PDT by
MplsSteve
(Don't Be Stupak!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson