Jim, I’m sure you’re a sincere man, but I’m telling you I’ve studied every Congressional district in the country going back to the 1st Congress. That seat is as impossible to win as they come, period. It is a moonbat district. Take everything you know to be right and sane and flip it upside down and that is what they believe there. You could have a Republican candidate with a billion dollars to challenge Pelosi, and they wouldn’t get more than 10-12% of the vote.
Let me show you the breakdown for post-1960 Presidential candidates for San Francisco County:
1960 & 1972 - 42% (Nixon)
1976 - 40% (Ford)
1980 - 32% (Reagan)
1984 - 31% (Reagan)
1988 - 26% (GHW Bush)
1992 - 18% (GHW Bush)
1996 - 16% (Dole)
2000 - 16% (GW Bush)
2004 - 15% (GW Bush)
2008 - 13.6% (McCain)
The sane people have left here, Jim. They’re not voting that way because they don’t “understand about Democrats”, they’re voting that way because they embrace the mental and moral dysfunctional and abhorrant behavior/lifestyles of the far left. Like I said, you’d need an event of biblical proportions to turn SF around, that or a half-million willing Conservatives ready to move there between now and election day in November.
Sadly, we couldn’t win Pelosi’s district if the Green Party candidate got 25% and the Socialist Workers Party got another 25%.
So if the sane people got out of Sodom and Gomorrah starting in the 1950’s, then I guess Eugene McCarthy was on the money, and the freak leftist takeover has been going on for 60 years.
Thanks for the info. Seems rotten to the core. I have a question for you — what if the candidate pretended to be ultra-liberal and was a Hispanic who shepherded the Hispanics into voting for one of their race? Do you think that will work?