Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney advisor on Palin: “She’s not a serious human being”
Hot Air ^ | July 15, 2010 | Allahpundit

Posted on 07/15/2010 5:26:28 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Huckabee’s taken potshots at her from time to time, but between this fusillade from unnamed Mitt advisors and the furious counterattack on Romney at Conservatives 4 Palin, I’d say that the 2012 primary is now, at long last, officially on.

In the immortal words of Greg Stillson, “The missiles are flying. Hallelujah.”

Still, few express much regard for Palin’s ultimate chances. One adviser to Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, and, by traditional standards, the putative 2012 frontrunner, says of Palin, “She’s not a serious human being.” Another Romney intimate warns, “If she’s standing up there in a debate and the answers are more than 15 seconds long, she’s in trouble.” One of the most experienced Republican national political operatives in the country suggests that while Palin might be envied and sleek, she lacks the endurance required for a protracted nomination fight. “She’s like a cheetah. She can run really fast, but not really long.” In the end, this school of thought about Palin goes, she is too polarizing to be seen as likely to beat Barack Obama, and Republicans will be too hungry in 2012 to risk nominating someone who could cost the party the White House — maybe even in a landslide…

Such a disjointed field can only provide more encouragement for Palin.

And nothing would make the White House happier. The President’s political advisers, troubled by the weak economy and Obama’s image as a big spender, are more worried than he is about re-election and more worried than they let on publicly. Obama himself has told people that he believes the Tea Party movement will still be going strong in 2012, leaving the party to go into battle against an incumbent with a candidate too far right to win. In fact, the President’s advisers believe that if Palin is the nominee, New York’s billionaire mayor, Michael Bloomberg, could enter the race as an independent, scrambling all the conventional rules yet again.

Bloomberg as a self-funded stalking horse for his pal Barry intent on taking down the GOP? Why, that sounds … entirely plausible, actually. As for the nastiness about her being unserious, righties as respected as Krauthammer and George Will have made the same point. And I’ve noted before myself that, given the media’s obsession with painting her as a female Quayle, she’d have to be virtually perfectly on the trail for more than a year to avoid that narrative. The tiniest, most innocent flub — think Bush being quizzed on the names of foreign diplomats — will be hyped into the second coming of the Katie Couric interview, with the press breathlessly insisting that no sane person would vote for such a doofus. Can she be that perfect on the trail? Can any human being, including Barack “Bitterly cling to guns and religion” Obama?

Follow the link and read all of that piece, actually, if only for the bit about Bush and Cheney both reportedly pushing their old pal Mitch Daniels to GOP movers and shakers. Given the reviving influence of Team Dubya over the party’s establishment, I wouldn’t underestimate Daniels’s ability to burst out of obscurity quickly via a huge push from prominent Republican donors and groups. And speaking of quick bursts, more on Palin from Mark Halperin:

She would be the only woman against a half-dozen or more Republican men. As long as she leaves the door to a race open, she can freeze the field, prevent other GOP hopefuls from gaining much traction, keep the media in a perpetual will-she-or-won’t-she frenzy and jump into the race whenever she likes. That would be impossible for an ordinary candidate, but Palin could splash in as late as November 2011, just a few months before the voting begins. There is no deadline for signing up for the Iowa caucuses, and when it comes to competing in early-state contests, she will have a far easier time than any previous insurgent. Her candidacy would require almost none of the usual time sinks that force politicians to jump in early: power-broker schmoozing, schedule-intensive fundraising, competitive recruitment of experienced strategists, careful policy development. She would have immediate access to cash, with even small Internet donations likely bringing in millions.

Fred Thompson splashed into the last primary late, but not as late as November. Then again, Fred wasn’t the grassroots phenomenon that Palin is and he suffered from the perception that his late start was due to him not caring quite as much about winning as the rest of the field. That wouldn’t be the case with Palin; her late entry would be seen as calculated for dramatic effect, which would probably give her boost. And the point about small donations is well taken: Romney’s PAC has dwarfed hers in fundraising so far this year, but according to the Globe, most of the money’s come from events and large donors. By contrast, three-quarters of SarahPAC’s haul came from small donors. That’s not good news for her in terms of raw numbers — Mitt can almost certainly use big-money bundlers to crush whatever amount she’d rake in from grassroots contributors — but the media will go bonkers for a storyline about plucky blue-collar conservatives trying to propel Palin to victory against the Romney fortune one five-dollar donation at a time. And of course, that media coverage will be worth millions in itself. Remember: The default press narrative in 2012 will be Palin vs. Anti-Palin, with the task for Romney, Daniels, or whoever emerges as her nemesis to try to embody the good qualities the Anti-Palin is supposed to have — smart, competent, experienced — while avoiding the bad ones (elitist, white-collar, uncharismatic). As such, they’d better be awfully careful with how far they push the condescension towards her, especially given the potential alluded to by Halperin for gender politics to enter this race. For what it’s worth, former McCain associate Mark McKinnon thinks she’s going to run even though neither she nor the country are ready for it. Note well his point at the end about what a Palin loss in the primary would mean; given the fervor her supporters are known for and the likelihood that the race will turn nasty, he’s totally right about the possibility of devastating party divisions in the general election.

Exit question: Some Palin critics are speculating that the Bristol/Levi tabloid wedding announcement was secretly blessed by Sarah. Um, given the fact that her alleged unseriousness is already a major political liability for her, why on earth would she do that?


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2012; acorn4romney; anonymoussources; bigdig4romney; du4romney; elitistsnobs; enemedia; gaymarriageromney; hatinpalin; illegals4romney; jaygarrity; mitt4romney; mlk4romney; monkeys4romney; nbc4romney; nicollewallace; obama; palin; pds; rino; rinopurge; rinos; romney; romneycare; romneymarriage; romneysanctuary; sarahpalin; seriouscanidate; steveschmidt; truthers4romney; unnamedsources; vichyrepublicans; waronsarah; warrentompkin; warrentompkins; whisperingcampaign; willard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
I raised slightly over $40,000 for Fred and will aim at $2 million dollars for Governor Palin. You can, too.
1 posted on 07/15/2010 5:26:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Romney advisor on Palin: “She’s not a serious human being””

I don’t see them saying that about Duncan Hunter, or Pawlenty...so I guess SARAH is the BIG-TIME FAVORITE for 2012.


2 posted on 07/15/2010 5:29:07 PM PDT by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

I hope President Palin finds a place for Rep. Hunter in her administration such as Secretary of the Army or ICE director, etc...


3 posted on 07/15/2010 5:30:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The 4th Estate is a 5th Column, do a #1 & #2 on them, cuz they're #10!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well you Romneyites, I voted for Mitt during the last Republican Presidential primary. THE NEXT DAY, he dropped out. He’ll never get my vote again. I don’t care if he’s the last “Republican” on Earth. I won’t vote for him.


4 posted on 07/15/2010 5:30:44 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Holder needs to resign! Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"... by traditional standards, the putative 2012 frontrunner ..."

Huh? Romney? What planet are we on, again?

5 posted on 07/15/2010 5:31:47 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If she gets the nomination, you can count me in for all I can afford.


6 posted on 07/15/2010 5:32:01 PM PDT by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“She’s not a serious human being”

Meaning she is not an IvY League Alinsky grad with more anxiety than a constipated monk at a nudist colony.

7 posted on 07/15/2010 5:32:10 PM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Dude, glad to see you are back on line!!!


8 posted on 07/15/2010 5:34:26 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I hope President Palin finds a place for Rep. Hunter in her administration such as Secretary of the Army or ICE director, etc...”

AMEN. The last person to have a problem with that would be me.


9 posted on 07/15/2010 5:35:32 PM PDT by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Memo to Mitt Romney:

If you showed up for a speech in Podunk, Missouri, you’d draw about 500 people, most of them political hacks.

Palin could show up, unannounced, and draw 5000 average Americans.

Now, why would you and your political minions be so worried about someone who is “not a serious person”? Cause she will BURY you if she runs.


10 posted on 07/15/2010 5:35:43 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey Mitt you RINO, FU and the advisers you rode in on


11 posted on 07/15/2010 5:35:54 PM PDT by Breto (never accept the premise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Mitt Dog-Abuser Romney is not serious human adult.

"But the details of the event are more than unseemly — they may, in fact, be illegal.
Massachusetts's animal cruelty laws specifically prohibit anyone
from carrying an animal "in or upon a vehicle, or otherwise, in an unnecessarily cruel
or inhuman manner or in a way and manner which might endanger the
animal carried thereon.
" An officer for the Massachusetts Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals responded to a description of the situation
saying "it's definitely something I'd want to check out." The officer,
Nadia Branca, declined to give a definitive opinion on whether Romney broke the law
but did note that it's against state law to have a dog in an open bed of a pick-up truck,
and "if the dog was being carried in a way that endangers it, that would be illegal."


"Dog on Roof? What Was It Like for Romney's Pooch?
Scientists Say Dog Likely Experienced Wind-Whipped, Uncomfortable Trip
"Before beginning the drive, Mitt Romney put Seamus, the family's hulking Irish setter,
in a dog carrier and attached it to the station wagon's roof rack.
e'd built a windshield for the carrier, to make the ride more comfortable for the dog," read the article.
Jordan Kaplan, the owner of Petaholics, a dog walking service in New York City,
and a lifelong dog owner and dog lover, said Romney's actions were uncalled for.
....What Happens to a Dog on a Roof Traveling 50 MPH?"


"Romney's dog - This is a distinction Mitt Romney probably could do without, but he is surely
the first presidential candidate to be attacked for putting a dog with diarrhea
in a carrier and tying it to the top of a station wagon.
Romney's defense: Seamus liked it. "He scrambled up there every time we went on trips,"
the Republican said during a campaign stop in Pittsburgh. "He got in all by himself and enjoyed it."


"As the oldest son, Tagg Romney commandeered the way-back of the wagon,
keeping his eyes fixed out the rear window, where he glimpsed the first sign of trouble.
''Dad!'' he yelled. ''Gross!'' A brown liquid was dripping down the back window,
payback from an Irish setter who'd been riding on the roof in the wind for hours.
As the rest of the boys joined in the howls of disgust,
Romney coolly pulled off the highway and into a service station.
There, he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car,
then hopped back onto the highway."


"Story about dog on car roof comes back to bite Romney
Critics, jokesters make issue of tale
TIME.com's Swampland blog has been flooded with more than 200 comments
from readers complaining of animal cruelty"


Romney's bad behavior Exposed by Seamus

"Romney Loses Nomination Over Dog Abuse?
Romney was traveling that summer with his wife, five sons, and Seamus to his parent's cottage on Lake Huron.
But hours into the ride, Seamus apparently suffered diarrhea,
which ran down the back window of the car. Romney's sons, all under 13, howled in disgust.
Romney pulled off the road into a service station.
There, he borrowed a hose, washed down Seamus and the car, and they drove on to Ontario.
.....David Kravitz wrote on BlueMassGroup, a liberal blog.
"It also strikes me as classic Romney: it solves a problem efficiently,
in a business-like manner, and with no regard whatsoever
for the suffering that the solution may cause."



12 posted on 07/15/2010 5:36:18 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah has more brains, common sense, and balls than any of the others I’ve seen. If she runs, she will get every dollar I can afford.
Romney is a has been RINO and Huckabee is a jerk-wannabe rock musician.
I love Newt, but he’s got too much baggage.


13 posted on 07/15/2010 5:37:25 PM PDT by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Hello. My name is Michael Bloomburg. I’m a multi-billionaire and I understand the hardship you are going through.”

Next.


14 posted on 07/15/2010 5:37:43 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I didn’t know Democrats were advising Mitt.


15 posted on 07/15/2010 5:38:23 PM PDT by citizencon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not a good idea for Romney to be taking the same line of attack against Palin that the Democrats did. Palin fans have been fighting that one for two years. They would take kindly to having the same thing said by a Republican.


16 posted on 07/15/2010 5:39:02 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Democrats = authoritarian socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney advisor on Palin: “She’s not a serious human being”

Keep listening to your "advisor" and you will waste more of your millions running in another loosing campaign.

18 posted on 07/15/2010 5:40:33 PM PDT by doc1019 (Martyrdom is a great thing, until it is your turn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This slick son of a bitch's Ceausescu moment is coming any day now.

Sans the firing squad, for now.

19 posted on 07/15/2010 5:40:38 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Exit question: Some Palin critics are speculating that the Bristol/Levi tabloid wedding announcement was secretly blessed by Sarah. Um, given the fact that her alleged unseriousness is already a major political liability for her, why on earth would she do that?

Because of the way it was explained by her daughter, Palin doesn't have to answer any questions about the engagement. She "didn't know" about it so there is nothing she can offer. All she can so is offer her blessings, which she did.

If you wanted to be really cynical you could suggest that Palin wants the marriage now so the entire sideshow of her single mom daughter is settled with Bristol's marriage is old news by the time she runs.

20 posted on 07/15/2010 5:40:50 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson