And also, how many of the same people that complained about Sarah Palin's speaking fees will say Mrs. Clinton is getting paid too much?
BTW, I'm pretty sure I already know the answer. 
Posted on 02/23/2013 9:13:17 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Clinton has signed up for speaking circuit and will charge a whopping $ 200,000 per appearance, an amount more than her annual salary as the U.S. Secretary of State.
The $ 200,000-per-speech fee will be a sizable increase for 65-year-old Clinton, who made $ 186,000 annually as secretary of state before stepping down earlier this month.
"Now that she's out as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton isn't going to be hurting for money, thanks to speaking fees of more $ 200,000 per speaking appearance, according to a source familiar with the situation," Buzzfeed reported.
Clinton will be represented by the New York-based Harry Walker agency, which also represents her husband Bill Clinton, the former U.S. President.
According to CNN, Clinton gave 471 paid speeches during his 11 years as a private citizen and raked in an average of $ 1,890,000 per event - joining the speaking industry's rarefied six-figure circle occupied by Arnold Schwarzenegger, Al Gore, Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin...
(Excerpt) Read more at indolink.com ...
If Governor Palin is getting at least $100,000 per speech she sure as heck isn't "washed-up" or irrelevant folks.
If she’d pay me $200,000 I’d consider going to hear her break wind at one of her “speeches”.
She gives Obama a run for his money when it comes tossing BS around!!!
.
.
.
- with armed Secret Service agents
that you pay for
.
.
.
Hope hillary enjoys it. She will never be President. Bet on it.
What difference does it make? :)
I wonder if she’ll be able to will her cheap self to part with some of that money and buy a suit that fits and get a decent haircut and color.
And also, how many of the same people that complained about Sarah Palin's speaking fees will say Mrs. Clinton is getting paid too much?
BTW, I'm pretty sure I already know the answer.
If she had something to say, she should have said it to Congress.
Maybe Congress should have paid her $200,000 to testify?
-PJ
Shouldn’t that read ‘$200,000 per screech?’
That's $890 million!
What could this woman possibly say that’s worth more than $0.05? Seriously. Someone please explain how her opinions on anything can possibly be worth $200,000.
The amount in the article says $1,89,000. I think they meant to say $189,000.
I wouldn’t pay $1.89 to hear either of these frauds speak.
I might be willing to listen to Hillary Clinton if she paid me $189,000 to listen, but frankly, I’m not sure even that’s worth it.
Dude...Wait, what? I absolutely love that picture! Thanks!
hey, at this point what does it matter?
What! I earned that money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.