Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Take Obama's "citizenship" status to the Supreme Court.
Max Valentine | August 29, 2013 | Max Valentine

Posted on 08/29/2013 10:47:44 AM PDT by MaxValentine

Given how that Obama is 50% United States and 50% Kenyan, ask yourself this question: would you like to live with just 50% of your body parts? Children are expected to do more than 50% of their schoolwork and the Electoral College is supposed to be won by at least more than 50% of Electoral College votes and George Washington was unaminously elected by the Electoral College. Seems like Obama is a threat to United States Security, remember his friend Rev. Jeremiah Wright? I say that the Supreme Court should nullify Obama's Presidential status.


TOPICS: Campaign News
KEYWORDS: brotherhood; cia; distractor; letsnottalkbengazi; letsnottalksyria; maybethistime; naturalborncitizen; obama; sorospaid; statedepartment; tidesfoundation; troll; usurped
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Lazamataz; 50mm; Darksheare
Yup. I knew it. Soros troll.

I concur. IBTZ.

41 posted on 08/29/2013 12:02:58 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MaxValentine

IBTZ. I hear viking kitties on the horizon.


42 posted on 08/29/2013 12:04:08 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff

The same thing that keeps us from winning on this issue will keep us from winning on ANY issue. Once the system has accepted that the rule of law is dead there’s nothing left except survival of the fittest, and the thugs have a distinct advantage since they control the entire system of courts, media, law enforcement, economy, bureaucracy, and military.

I agree that we need to fight on all fronts and I’ve been trying to do that, but until our so-called “leaders” drop their squeamishness about calling a spade a spade and stop worrying about their image with the “cool kids”, it doesn’t matter which spade we concentrate on; they’ll never call it what it is and thus never actually confront it.

And regarding “standing”, the courts need to learn that if there is no justice all that’s left will be vigilante justice. As long as they think we’re too pansified to actually do it, they have no incentive to give us real justice. This is OUR country, they better dang well believe it is our business if a foreign enemy combatant elected to the White House by the ignorant masses is sending our finest off to be killed by an enemy he armed, or is committing acts of war against Mexico, Libya, Egypt, and Syria and arming the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda affiliates in Syria, and Hamas in Egypt. It is OUR business if he is paying another country to murder its own innocent civilians so he can have Hamas on Israel’s doorstep in Egypt. It is OUR business if he is providing over 20,000 manpads with which the planes we and our loved ones fly in can be blown to bits at any time. This is ALL our business, and if the courts don’t figure that out the easy way then they’re gonna have to learn it the hard way. Maybe they need to wade through angry protesters every time they leave their office or their house. Maybe they need to be booed at the pizza parlor. Something has to hit home to them, that they CANNOT ride this tiger forever.


43 posted on 08/29/2013 12:04:44 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Admin Moderator
Admin, my spidey-sense is going off.

How might the Mods "edit" the thread title post-ZOT: "Take .....

44 posted on 08/29/2013 12:06:51 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
45 posted on 08/29/2013 12:07:05 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
IBTZ. I hear viking kitties on the horizon.

And I SEE them on the horizon ....


46 posted on 08/29/2013 12:11:12 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MaxValentine

Ok. You’re a troll.


47 posted on 08/29/2013 12:49:51 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; biff

Exactly true! Did you read my comment:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/gop/3060295/posts?page=36#36


48 posted on 08/29/2013 12:56:22 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Just reading your whole comments.

WELL SAID!

(insert gif of ferocious applause!)


49 posted on 08/29/2013 12:57:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: biff

We must not because an horrific our Constitution has suffered a horrific insult.

We must not be silent about that.


50 posted on 08/29/2013 12:58:36 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: biff

Here is the corrected version:

We must not because our Constitution has suffered a brutal insult.

We must not be silent about that.


51 posted on 08/29/2013 1:01:28 PM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Under the laws in effect when he was born YEs, he is a citizen. He is NOT, by the laws in place at his birth, a NATURAL BORN citizen.

There IS a difference. Look it up, ixquick is your friend.


52 posted on 08/29/2013 1:32:45 PM PDT by Don W (Know what you WANT. Know what you NEED. Know the DIFFERENCE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MaxValentine

Sometimes its better to just stick your toes in the water first instead of doing a belly flop off the high dive. :-)


53 posted on 08/29/2013 2:08:22 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
After what happened with Chief Justice Roberts on Obamacare being a “tax”, what makes you think that SCOTUS will ever give a right ruling on the things really critical to Obama’s thug regime?

Exactly.

SCOTUS is compromised. That horrendously bad ruling clinches it.

54 posted on 08/29/2013 3:36:30 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj
citizen by birth but not ‘natural born citizen’ - not one that is born on US soil to 2 USA citizen parentS.

Kindly point to the line in the Constitution where it says that. Or, failing that, the relevant federal law.

Birthers may keep repeating it over and over, but it won't be any more true no matter how many times they do it.
55 posted on 08/29/2013 5:14:08 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

The return of LorenC.


56 posted on 08/29/2013 7:04:07 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

You are exactly right. The candidates who received electoral votes and who had a chance to be elected but were denied that opportunity due to an ineligible candidate would be able to show direct injury from Obama’s election, and so would the political party that nominated them.
So McCain, Palin, Romney, Ryan and the Republican National Committee on their candidates’ behalf would have standing to bring suit or to enter an existing suit as lead co-plaintiffs.
None of the above chose to file a lawsuit or to join a class action suit.


57 posted on 08/29/2013 8:00:58 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rides3

Obama has lost two-thirds of the appeals that he wanted at the Supreme Court.

“...during the 2012-13 term, which began in October and ended Wednesday, the court rejected Mr. Obama’s arguments on property rights, affirmative action, voting rights and other issues.
“Despite some notable victories, the Obama administration has had an unusually poor batting average at the high court,” said Adam Winkler, a constitutional law professor at UCLA. “Like last year, the Obama administration lost more cases than it won.”

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/26/obama-administration-lost-two-thirds-of-cases-duri/?page=all


58 posted on 08/29/2013 8:06:32 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus
the Federal Government’s historical win-lose record in the Supreme Court is 70%.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:U4xFVJIj2xwJ:www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/281/Spitzer-Cohen2.pdf+success+rate+federal+government+supreme+court&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjOev7_j921evLN1hXDIldncEjQ2IOV2KMU1ulRLgabchEc9qEyeK_o3lF3eoAzoslrODOz5sqB3y3_95L6e86UvykebTdHkhwjoLEgdyCkNiknzUhLt0ZpHR5xWqo3reSLT-p3&sig=AHIEtbTTKzW_Z4Uu9c-5jmoZtyhzQwJs7g

As Obama is supposedly a "constitutional expert," we would expect the Obama Administration to improve upon that record, or, at least hold its own as regards historical comparisons. But that is not the case.

Obama's Administration's misuse of the U.S. Constitution is front and center when his record is documented. In 24 Court decisions involving the Obama Administration, 15 were decided against his Administration and several of those were by 9-0 margins.

Obama's track record with the Supreme Court is the worst in American history. His record indicates one of the most abusive Administrations of all time, abusive in its blatant disregard for Constitutional Law.

Why support that?

59 posted on 08/29/2013 11:09:22 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Rides3

Ride33 just said: “SCOTUS is compromised. That horrendously bad ruling clinches it. “

Obviously when an Adminstration has the “worst record at the Supreme Court of any Adminstration in history,” the Supreme Court can’t be “compromised.”


60 posted on 08/29/2013 11:28:27 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson