Posted on 05/10/2014 5:32:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Benghazi MANDPADS Clinton.
There is a strong parallel with how most leftists/liberals during the Cold War era were proudly “anti” anti-communists. Now Hillary and co. are anti-anti-terrorism, no matter what their pretences when they are put in the spotlight over specific terrorist attacks.
Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. Blocked Terrorist Designation for Boko Haram
By Andrew C. McCarthy
“The Left, by contrast, seems to believe that “Islamists” — adherents of Islamic supremacism (though the Left would not refer to “Islamic supremacism”) — are motivated not by an ideology derived from scriptural commands but by American policies that promote national defense, pursue other U.S. interests, and regard Israel as a key ally. Indeed, progressives like Mrs. Clinton are anti-anti-terrorists in the sense that they portray the national-security right as a greater threat than Islamic supremacism.”
No one is blaming her for Boco Loco. We just want to hear her explain why she resisted for years calling them terrorists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=angi1vwUkQc
Geeeze...what are the hillary cheerleaders so sensitive about?
Maybe they can ask moveon.org why they made a petition wanting the Obama Administration to NOT call this group a terrorist one..LOL no one is afraid of Hillary Clinton..she is her own worst nightmare, a cold blooded murderer..which is a big plus for the left since they are the party of murder
Big Media must be really worried about this if they’re already trying to innoculate Hillary.
The media-left keeps creating a silly straw man argument by pretending that the criticism is that Hillary is SOLELY responsible for Boko Haram.
The issue is that she did NOTHING about them and in particular did not follow strong recommendations from other depts. (Justice and the intel community) to add them to the terrorism list.
Ofc this would not have eliminated Boko Haram, but it would have provide some tools for combating. The question is not whether Hillary could somehow have eliminated them entirely, it is whether she did anything at all and in particular whether or not she took the obvious measure available to her.
Hillary Clinton's failure to deal with Boko Haram is simply one example of the uniform incompetence consistently demonstrated by all democrats in dealing with threats to our nation and our neighbors.
Of course it's blame - she's part of the universally corrupt machine that drives the democrat party, some say the soon to be heir apparent to the socialist crown.
Well, it’s true that it’s Obama’s fault, since she was about the dumbest, most powerless SOS ever and only did what the boss told her...which was usually to stay out of sight except when she had to take the hit for something he or one of his advisors had done.
Obama had a Muslim-terrorist friendly policy all through those years, and Hillary sure wasn’t going to be the one to oppose it. She just followed orders.
What Idiot would fear Ms. Clinton, don’t think any freepers do
I am waiting for the statement about how distraught she is about the girls and how this was unforeseen.
The Clintons are trying to get all of her baggage (read record) out of the way so in 2016 they can claim it is all old business and has been dealt with.
IIRC Hillarys assistant was connected to the Muslim Brotherhood. She is responsible for that.
So, does that mean every time Hillary attacks a Republican that means she fears them?
Unsecured Libyan Weapons Went to Boko Haram
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3153710/posts
The primary target of Boko Haram has been Christians, their churches and schools. Yes, any Muslim that wants their daughter educated is also in their crosshairs. Any Muslim that wants their son to learn anything other than the Koran is also a target. However the prime targets are Christian. That’s why our State Department protected them.
I think the following is an important point to make for anyone who can get the attention of national media plus real conservative leaders speaking out against Hillary.
Moveon.org now claims that this petition effort is irrelevant because it only received (they claim) around 100 signatures. They are running away from the issue and claiming that the petition was obscure. Now they do not dare to defend HILLARY’s own policy.Statement in response to Rep. Stockman’s bogus “MoveOn supports terrorists” attack
By Anna Galland. Saturday, May 10 2014
BUT now that Moveon.org has been embarrassed enough to remove the petition from their site, the argument must be made that a policy which so embarrasses the leftist clowns at Moveon.org
WAS IN FACT THE POLICY OF THE HILLARY CLINTON STATE DEPARTMENT
Statement in response to Rep. Stockman’s bogus “MoveOn supports terrorists” attack
By Anna Galland. Saturday, May 10 2014
Thus, a policy that even Moveon.org now runs away from was in fact Hillary’s policy.... and this was despite strong urgings from our intel community to change this policy!!
Doesn’t “Boko Haram” actually mean “Western education is evil” or some such?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.