Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Five: Unlike Hillary, Palin Was Fair Game to Media Because She’s ‘Not Human’
Mediaite ^ | May 20, 2014 | Josh Feldman

Posted on 05/21/2014 10:49:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: KC_Lion

I’ve known people who can hate everyone and everything, just because they hate themselves and who they are so much.

Sarah represents all that is good and honest and AMERICAN when she campaigns, and lots of folks can’t stand that...it makes them physically recoil. Kinda like the evil minions when they were cast from the swine...

Watch them head for the cliff edge.


21 posted on 05/21/2014 1:51:02 PM PDT by Monkey Face (I never get my knickers in a knot because it solves nothing and makes me walk funny,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

It is the face of the media and the Libs...they are evil incarnate. Satan is VERY active these days, trying to destroy America. BELIEVE IT!


22 posted on 05/21/2014 1:52:28 PM PDT by Monkey Face (I never get my knickers in a knot because it solves nothing and makes me walk funny,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The left can’t stand Sarah Palin because she is what they wish they were..a loving, caring, God loving human being. When they see Trig they see the child they aborted that is what makes them SO angry when they see his adorable face and his smile, they see the child they killed and it makes them angry..they wish Sarah had murdered her child but she refused to because she values life..the left sees a happy family, with their challenges yes, but happy, and they hate it, because leftists are miserable miserable human beings and they can’t stand seeing anyone happy..No matter what they throw at Sarah she is always happy, always with a smile on her face and that is what they despise


23 posted on 05/21/2014 1:53:07 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face; KC_Lion

Bump to what you said, Monkey Face. Spot on!

May the Lord continue to keep, and bless, Sarah.


24 posted on 05/21/2014 1:58:56 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I keep saying, that with enough pressure from Americans, the Libs will implode under their own explosive hatred.

The Lord promised that as long as America was led in righteousness, He would continue to bless it. It is a warning to Americans that we are now witness to the evil that has been allowed to rule for so long.

If I understood all I should about the Constitution, I would break it down, explain it line by line, and email it to everyone I know with the plea that it be emailed to everyone THEY know. America is being assailed, and she needs people to be educated, not dummied down by Common Core, Political Correctness and “Racism.”

However, that ability is not mine to claim...CFIDS makes it difficult to understand complex language...including knitting and crochet instructions!


25 posted on 05/21/2014 2:11:54 PM PDT by Monkey Face (I never get my knickers in a knot because it solves nothing and makes me walk funny,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The SPEW.

Listening to those disgusting women turns my stomach.

26 posted on 05/21/2014 2:22:20 PM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Back in the late sixties and early seventies when media outlets began hiring females and minorities in large numbers, virtually every female and minority scribbler they hired were radicals. Most females hired to scribble for the major rags were arch-feminists. Whenever some topic concerning women arose, these femi-hacks would always go to another radical feminist like Gloria Steinem or Betty Friedman for the “women’s” slant on the issue. Non radical feminist females like Phylis Schafly were were rarely consulted. Despite the fact that average women far more resembled Sarah Palin in their beliefs than the radical feminists. It continues today.


27 posted on 05/21/2014 3:43:18 PM PDT by driftless2 (:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

I wish Jesus would come and end this mess.


28 posted on 05/21/2014 3:53:29 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (The zombies here elected alcee hastings. TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
“They treated her like an alien cartoon, because no one in the media had ever come into contact with anybody like Sarah Palin, yet they were constantly surrounded by people like Hillary Clinton, which are petulant progressives with a thirst for power.”

And it’s not just on issues of health, he and Eric Bolling also brought up the attacks on Palin’s children, which were never tolerated about Chelsea Clinton. Bolling said it was “the most disgusting thing” the media did...

When the press trades 'ins' with democrat sources for their integrity - it's newsworthy. Not enough people know it's going on...

29 posted on 05/21/2014 5:12:23 PM PDT by GOPJ (If dems will "death panel" our vets they'll damn sure death panel the rest of us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Liberals consider anyone who dares to disagree with them non-human.

They consider minorities to be their property.

At least the plantation owners considered their slaves 3/5 of a person. That’s 60 percent more than current liberals.

Not so. They considered a slave not to be a person at all, in their right to vote (&c) - but, hypocritically, to be a full person for census purposes which determined how many representatives their state was entitled to. The position of the northern states was that since slaves weren’t voters their numbers should not count at all for purposes of representation. The compromise agreed to in the Constitution ceded to the slave states 3/5 of their hypocrisy on the issue of representation.

The hypocritical position of Democrats today is their insinuation that it was the 2/5 concession that the antislavery North won at the convention, and not the ability of free southern voters to elect “Representatives” of 3/5 of those whom they enslaved, which was hypocritical.


30 posted on 05/21/2014 5:40:22 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

The plantation owners viewed their slaves as more human than today’s Democrats view their descendants.


31 posted on 05/22/2014 8:29:55 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson