Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary imploding?
Hot Air ^ | June 18, 2014 | Allahpundit

Posted on 06/18/2014 5:23:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Keep hope alive, says Jonathan Last. Not only has she been gaffe-ing up America’s airwaves — the “dead broke” remark, that gay-marriage meltdown interview with NPR, and some offhanded inanity about how smart the Russian reset was — but it’s all been happening against a backdrop of fiasco for American foreign policy.

How’d you like to be a former Secretary of State running on this record?

Obama — perhaps you’ve heard this? — got bin Laden. But other than that, his foreign policy record is disastrous: Libya, Egypt, Syria, the South China Sea, Crimea, Iraq, Afghanistan. It is difficult to find a spot on the globe that is better off today than when Obama took office. And yet Obama’s foreign policy is the only entry of substance on Hillary Clinton’s resume right now. Which means it will carry double the weight.

For Obama, Putin and Crimea are a mid-size political problem, ranked somewhere above the Keystone pipeline. For Clinton it’s an existential problem because foreign affairs are the only measures for her basic professional competence.

Think about it from the perspective of a Democratic voter: Hillary Clinton was wrong on Monica Lewinsky during the (Bill) Clinton years, wrong on gay marriage and Iraq during the Bush years, and now wrong on Putin and Syria and Egypt and the whole of American foreign policy during the Obama years. What has she ever been right on? And if you’re a Democratic voter, at some point you start to wonder, Can’t we do better?

Do you? Go watch this clip before you answer. My trust in the commentariat’s ability to gauge which gaffes are truly damaging among average voters and which aren’t is down to zero at this point, and yeah, I certainly include myself in “the commentariat.” The ultimate example of this, I think, is Obama’s “you didn’t build that” line during the 2012 campaign. Conservative media blew up over it, me included, to the point where it became a key theme at the GOP convention. Voters didn’t care, though, because most voters aren’t “builders.” They’re wage-earners. You could crap on entrepreneurs all day and they wouldn’t flinch, although it’d probably convince the Chamber of Commerce to pause from its amnesty campaigning for five minutes to write a check to your opponent.

My hunch is that nothing Hillary’s said this week has reduced her chances. It takes a big gaffe to register with average voters, and that gaffe has to reveal some perceived “deeper truth” about the candidate to have legs, I suspect. That’s why Romney’s “47 percent” comment outgrew the punditocracy and actually penetrated the electorate. It seemed to confirm the sense of him as a country-club Republican who looked down on the lower class. There’s potential, I guess, for Hillary’s “dead broke” comment and her stupid whining about how “brutal” American politics is to make her seem “out of touch,” but never forget that she’s got Bill around to give her a shot of blue-collar appeal when needed. If her last name weren’t “Clinton,” you might have something in drawing her as the consummate limousine liberal. As it is, I think it’s a glancing blow, nothing more, especially if the GOP ends up supporting the “out of touch” attack by, er, nominating a guy named Bush. As for the gay-marriage interview, it’s hard for me to believe liberals are going to give her too hard a time over any heresy knowing how difficult it is for a party to win the White House for three consecutive terms. Iraq is the perfect example. Her vote to invade helped Obama pull the upset in 2008, but no one thinks it’ll keep her from the nomination now. She’s clearly the strongest candidate Democrats have in an extremely difficult political climate. They’ll be prudent in deciding how severely to punish her for deviations from orthodoxy.

As for foreign policy, everything Last said is true — it looks like O’s going to toss her the keys to an agenda that’s been completely totaled. But … since when do voters elect presidents based on foreign policy? The only clear example I can think of recently is 2004 and it took 9/11 to make that happen. Even in 2008, when Obama ran as the anti-Bush and the GOP nominated the hawk di tutti hawks, McCain was competitive until the bottom dropped out on Wall Street. Unless Rand Paul shocks everyone in the primaries, the next Republican nominee is likely to run to Hillary’s right on foreign policy, which will set her up nicely to run a “no more Iraqs” campaign. (Repudiating her own vote for war will also rally the left.) That strategy might not work as well as it did in 2008, but barring any major terror attacks on the U.S., it’ll work well enough to neutralize most of the GOP’s foreign-policy criticism, especially if the economy picks up a bit in 2015-16 and gives her something else to talk about. You have two big problems running against her and neither has anything to do with the finer points of foreign policy. One: How do you neutralize Bill’s popularity? She’s going to run on his economic record, not O’s, and he’s going to help her — a lot, I’ll bet — with blue-collar voters. She may be a bad retail politician but he’s an exceptional one, and he’ll be campaigning as much as she will. What do you do about it? (Start by nominating a conspicuously blue-collar yourself, I’d guess.) Two: How do you neutralize the “it’s time for a woman” argument? That argument doesn’t depend on who’s gaffed worst or who was really responsible for security at the Benghazi consulate. My hunch is that the GOP will start this campaign with a single-digit lead among men and Hillary will start with a double-digit lead among women. Either we build heavily on the former or reduce the latter or we lose. Is the “dead broke” thing or Ukraine going to help do that?

Update: Tough but fair.

Just Karl @justkarl

Does it matter whether Hillary is imploding
when the GOP's big idea is a man in a squirrel suit?

2:52 PM - 18 Jun 2014

19 Retweets 10 favorites


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; homosexualagenda; iraq; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2014 5:23:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s hope so. do Mr. Creosote proud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhbHTjMLN5c


2 posted on 06/18/2014 5:28:32 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If the Republican candidate is a Senator like Cruz or Paul, then the Republicans at best tie on the experience contest.

If the Republican candidate is a Governor, and since most of the Governors that are likely to run are pro-amnesty in one form or another, the Republicans risk keeping the diehard conservatives at home.

I really don't see how any likely Republican candidate beats Hillary, especially if the low information voters are jonesing to put the first woman in office.

3 posted on 06/18/2014 5:31:59 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Go read Ted Cruz’s bio, remembering that he is ONLY 43 years old. I’ll wait.


4 posted on 06/18/2014 5:32:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million for ANY 2016 pro-2nd Amendment candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HE got OBL?

No, he prevented us getting OBL, who we knew where he was, until his own people forced him, then he ran to the head of the crowd to lead the parade.


5 posted on 06/18/2014 5:33:27 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

His bio suggests he would make a wonderful Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.


6 posted on 06/18/2014 5:37:09 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is Hillary imploding?

If by "imploding" you include digging an ever-deepening hole for herself, and going through all her shoes due to "hoof-in-mouth" disease, then yeah...

She is imploding and exploding and disintegrating...

7 posted on 06/18/2014 5:37:38 PM PDT by publius911 ( Politicians come and go... but the (union) bureaucracy lives and grows forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Do we even know if he got OBL?

And even if he did, do we know that at that point OBL was all that important to Al Qaeda either in reality or even symbolically?

8 posted on 06/18/2014 5:39:02 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Her only hope is to strike a Faustian bargain with the Chicago Mob.

And I’m not so sure they are willing to do it.


9 posted on 06/18/2014 5:42:35 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911
Obama had no right to even run for president. He had NO record to run on. What we knew of him before he got elected was all bad news: associated with a racist church, involved with shady real estate dealings, non-transparent with regard to his business and educational record, etc.

Even though he started from nowhere, he still got enough boost from the MSM that he got into office.

However truly worthless, or even hazardous, Hillary's record is, the perception is that she held important positions at an important time (i.e. during the administration of the first black president) and so she must be qualified to be Prez. This plus the MSM lies we know will be told and retold make me almost certain that Hillary will be our next Prez.

She will be better than Obama, but that's not saying much.

10 posted on 06/18/2014 5:43:59 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Hillabeast is acting as if her primary counselor is Plugs Biden a/k/a “The Gaff-o-matic”.


11 posted on 06/18/2014 5:44:20 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (Have a wonderful day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Nope. We really don’t. And I personally really doubt he survived Tora Bora. If he did, his kidney issues were not conductive to life on the run from the planet.

But since no one wants to think about it, the lies they promote can be used against them just as easily.


12 posted on 06/18/2014 5:44:36 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: publius911

Cut her some slack. It takes her longer to shower and style than her male opponents. She said it last night.


13 posted on 06/18/2014 5:46:57 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
I really don't see how any likely Republican candidate beats Hillary, especially if the low information voters are jonesing to put the first woman in office.

I have been saying it for years. I hope I am wrong, but never underestimate the stupidity of the American people. If she wins, and I believe she will, the destruction that the Obungler started, will be completed under the Hidebeast.

14 posted on 06/18/2014 5:48:57 PM PDT by Mark17 (Rudyard Kipling to Liberals: When the SHTF, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon will clobber you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hope so.


15 posted on 06/18/2014 5:49:15 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
The Antichrist followed by the Whore of Babylon.

I guess we can hope that the third time will be the charm.

16 posted on 06/18/2014 5:51:09 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Is Hillary imploding?

If she is should she be moved a safe distance from the planet?

17 posted on 06/18/2014 5:51:10 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

She is really formidable, in theory, and a great pick for the Dems, in theory. In reality, she’s a train wreck, and always has been. Her numbers always go up when she isn’t heard from. If the GOP were at all competent, she wouldn’t have a chance.


18 posted on 06/18/2014 5:53:13 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Be seeing you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

People are tired of the Clintons and she’s old. She can’t fake the cool factor that got Obama elected and she has a record of incompetence in the public eye. All she can run on is her uterus.
I expect to hear her talk about wanting tattoos, pop music and to weep a little in public as she power-walks away from the flaming failure that is Obama’s presidency.


19 posted on 06/18/2014 5:59:22 PM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
If the GOP were at all competent, she wouldn’t have a chance.

There is that "if" word agin. Our only hope is the "if" word? I have a bad feeling about it.

20 posted on 06/18/2014 6:00:04 PM PDT by Mark17 (Rudyard Kipling to Liberals: When the SHTF, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon will clobber you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

She’s waiting for November when William Jefferson Webster “lil bubba” Clinton-Mezvinsky pops out and the media “granny gasm” erupts.


21 posted on 06/18/2014 6:02:01 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary could keel over tomorrow, and the ‘RATS would coat her with shellac and drag her around the campaign trail for the next 2+ years. She’s running, and with the help of the lapdog media, she will crush any Rovian RINO the GOPe decide to run.


22 posted on 06/18/2014 6:04:02 PM PDT by twister881 (It's OK to display pictures of a man with a bullwhip stuck in his anus, but not a football logo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881
something like this....

Hillary imploding....


23 posted on 06/18/2014 6:10:15 PM PDT by spokeshave (OMG.......Schadenfreude overload is not covered under Obamacare :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Don’t kid yourselves.....she’s got about a 47% built-in vote.


24 posted on 06/18/2014 6:17:52 PM PDT by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, let’s hope so. But be very suspicious when dealing with Statists of any stripe.

They could be doing all this now so that in a year and a half, if anyone brings it up, the state-run stenographers in the MSM can say, “We covered that a long time ago. She’s fine.”

On another note, the reason why the MSM seems to be turning on Obammie the Commie and what appears to be destroying his administration has one goal: to destroy Joe Biden.

The DNC can’t risk Biden running, so they have to sabotage the entire last two years of Obammie the Commie’s administration. When they are all destroyed, the playing field will be wide open, and the clear successor will be Mrs. Bill “I gave missile-guidance technology to the ChiComs” Clinton.

Either that, or the DNC has someone up their sleeve that will wipe the field (another woman, er wymn or however they spell it, perhaps).


25 posted on 06/18/2014 6:17:55 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
My dream for Cruz is 8 years as POTUS followed by 30 years on SCOTUS.
26 posted on 06/18/2014 6:18:58 PM PDT by kitchen (Even the walls have ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know, Hitlery Rotten Clinton looks happy here:

http://themadjewess.com/2012/07/23/the-most-hideous-picture-of-hillary-rotten-clinton-ever/


27 posted on 06/18/2014 6:19:19 PM PDT by Vinylly (?%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

My fears exactly. The RINOs (GOPe) are jonesing so hard to be praised as the neo-progressives that they cannot see that they have lost their base almost completely.

If a RINO runs, I’m voting third party. Yes, I know exactly what that means. But I won’t (literally) pinch my nose and vote for another McCain or Romney. The numbers of votes those GOPers did receive from the nose-pinchers sends the GOPe the false message that we’ll keep putting up with their progressive BS.

If they’re going to lose, they need to lose hard enough to be buried forever.


28 posted on 06/18/2014 6:20:39 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I think she waiting for first grandbaby make her more family oriented to people

Come on you can’t say jack about grandma to be

Unless you goofing on Hillary

I don’t see Hillary knitting booties for Chelesa


29 posted on 06/18/2014 6:29:11 PM PDT by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Perhaps a wymn that’s also an injun ... or at least claims to be?


30 posted on 06/18/2014 6:29:45 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

She was stuck in the shower all through those horrific hours of Benghazi.


31 posted on 06/18/2014 6:42:56 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Obama - The Scandal a Week President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, only the American people can implode, and in that case “What difference does it make?”


32 posted on 06/18/2014 6:43:25 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

33 posted on 06/18/2014 6:54:33 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
 photo HilMor2theend_zps1ddd2b52.jpg
34 posted on 06/18/2014 6:56:23 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

The dims managed to steal the reelection of baraq in ‘12.
They have their mechanisms in place to steal the next presidential election. The party and the party’s media are not even talking about anyone else except Hillary. Since the party has figured out how to rig an election, she will probably be the next person in the position of President.
But know this, she will be much more dangerous than baraq. She doesn’t golf and she isn’t distracted like him with basketball brackets and ESPN. She doesn’t vacation like him. She is on a mission and is very determined. She will be the destruction of us all.
Based on all that, the GOPe will run a Christie or a jeb bush and we will all be be forked big time.

see my tag line.


35 posted on 06/18/2014 6:57:53 PM PDT by Texas resident (The democrat party is now the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“I really don’t see how any likely Republican candidate beats Hillary, especially if the low information voters are jonesing to put the first woman in office.”

I was flipping channels (a frequent habit of mine during commercials) and happened across Jesse Watters on BOR interviewing women holding up Hillary for Prez signs. One or two said they wanted her elected because she was a woman, when others were asked about Benghazi, they had a deer in the headlights look - - didn’t have a clue, and, IIRC one or two said they didn’t know who he was (though that might have been another interview - I might be mixing them up). Talk about LIV - or, perhaps totally uninformed voters as it was in NYC, and, I suspect if they read anything it’s the NYT.


36 posted on 06/18/2014 7:18:42 PM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I bet the media will be going after her for being so rich. Just like they did to Mitt Romney.

Right?


37 posted on 06/18/2014 7:20:54 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Romney limited himself to around $200 million when similar hedge fund managers are normally billionaires. The Clinton family has much more than Milt.


38 posted on 06/18/2014 7:24:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million for ANY 2016 pro-2nd Amendment candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident; kingattax

I can not disagree. I DO believe the Hildebeast will be worse than the Obungler. Can you say gas chambers and ovens? It wasn’t too long ago, I would have laughed at that. Now, I am not so sure, especially when those dip sticks have already said they expect 25 to 30 million Americans will be deemed unacceptable for the re education camps. The only thing I will slightly disagree on, is your tag line. I do not think the rat party is NOW the CPUSA. I think the rat party has been the CPUSA for quite a long time already. I wish my tagline meant something, but hey, maybe they will start selling ice cubes in Hell, and it will.


39 posted on 06/18/2014 7:27:06 PM PDT by Mark17 (Rudyard Kipling: Liberals be wary, when the SHTF, The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon will clobber you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

I wish I could say that I disagree with you, but I can’t. I also believe that the Democrats perfected their re-election technique in 2012 and that it will be in place in 2014 and 2016.


40 posted on 06/18/2014 7:46:32 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Democrats won the last two presidential elections by running a candidate that Americans felt sorry for. They will keep running that play until it doesn’t work. How much sympathy did Hillary get with her “we were broke” comment? The Democrats may just have seen the anointed replacement go down.


41 posted on 06/18/2014 8:03:09 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

OBL died long ago, as one taxi driver up here told me, they have hundreds. The original died a ways back, but there’s always more to spring up. They’ll never let that legend die.

As for Hillary imploding... well one can hope.


42 posted on 06/18/2014 8:17:18 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sport

I’ve said for a long time that voting isn’t going to fix anything. I don’t think people have the parts to fix it though.


43 posted on 06/18/2014 8:22:12 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Good point: the media torpedoing Obama to sink Biden. Hillary's part is to simply tread water as the competent policy wonk until the campaign season really starts to warm up and that has not worked out. I expect the media to spin and cover for her, too, soon after the mid-terms, however.
44 posted on 06/18/2014 10:20:45 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Seattle Conservative

I’m almost willing to bet those Hillary supporter’s do know about Benghazi and that their deer-in-the-headlights-who’s-Ben-Ghazi? response is a practiced one designed to befuddle interviewer and audience alike while the cheering for Hillary! The First Woman President! goes on.


45 posted on 06/18/2014 10:27:11 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton will not run for POTUS in 2016!!! Both her interviews on CNN & Fox News Channel had horrible viewer numbers...way below the everyday numbers for their daily time slots that she did her interviews. Her book is now tanking big time on Amazon.com!!!

Hillary Clinton is toast....no....burnt toast!!! End of story!!!


46 posted on 06/18/2014 10:56:51 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hilary Rodham Clinton has been a habitual liar who is despised by all good Americans for decades.

Her cattle futures bribe, her Rose Law Firm corruption, her radical student days, her part in the corruption in Arkansas, her affair with and then murder of Vincent Foster, her deals with the Communist Chinese have all been documented.

However, the MSM always praises her and lies for her.

47 posted on 06/19/2014 12:12:59 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Think about it from the perspective of a Democratic voter: Hillary Clinton was wrong on Monica Lewinsky during the (Bill) Clinton years, wrong on gay marriage and Iraq during the Bush years, and now wrong on Putin and Syria and Egypt and the whole of American foreign policy during the Obama years. What has she ever been right on? And if you’re a Democratic voter, at some point you start to wonder, Can’t we do better?

The flaw in this analysis is, most of them do not think at all. She's a 'D' that's all that matters. As a bonus, she's a she, and isn't it time we had a woman president (never mind that for all the hype of being the smartest woman in the world she's actually dumb as a box of rocks politically speaking, is an egomaniac, and power-hungry, and I believe, carries a huge chip on her shoulder for having to put up with her philandering lying horny-hick-from-Hope husband)?

48 posted on 06/19/2014 12:49:02 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
"Hilary Rodham Clinton has been a habitual liar who is despised by all good Americans for decades.
Her cattle futures bribe, her Rose Law Firm corruption, her radical student days, her part in the corruption in Arkansas, her affair with and then murder of Vincent Foster, her deals with the Communist Chinese have all been documented.
However, the MSM always praises her and lies for her."

I agree 100%

49 posted on 06/19/2014 3:30:56 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Want gun control? Look at Iraq and other countries where the people are rounded up and shot .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
"Hillary Clinton is toast....no....burnt toast!!! End of story!!!"

Music to me Irish ears. . .

50 posted on 06/19/2014 3:33:02 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Want gun control? Look at Iraq and other countries where the people are rounded up and shot .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson