Posted on 03/11/2016 7:53:52 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Conservative my old butt. Cruz is bought and payed for by the NWO/Goldman Sachs/CFR Globalist cabal. Do you support that group of insidious rat bastards also? How about Bush and the whacko Beck being front and center in lyin’ Canadian Ted’s campaign? Do you support those 2 scum also?
Go, Ted, Go! Cruz or lose!
It’s amazing in how many strong showings Teddy has had and is still losing...I guess they’re not as strong as Rubio’s strong showings...
There...fixed it for ya....
He is....
As usual, when a positive thread is posted about Cruz all of the usual Trump supporters swoop in and crap all over it with inuendo and ad hominem attacks and no discussion regarding the information in the article. So much for the request made by Jim just a few days ago. I guess the request for civility was only meant to apply to things posted about Trump.
Seems the closer Cruz gets to running past Trump, the worse Trumpbots get. Does desperation ring a bell?
“I forgot to say that Cruz is the Devil.”
You forgot Antichrist and Hitler. Devil is so, well, understated by Trump supporter standards.
“I guess the request for civility was only meant to apply to things posted about Trump.”
Well, duh. Being Trump means never having to say you’re civil or sorry. Being a Trump supporter means standing in the middle of the street at night screaming at fire hydrants because they won’t admit they support Donald Trump and that Ted Cruz is the Antichrist. Stupid fire hydrants.
Yup!
“He is a ball-less blowhard who is not eligible to run for the presidency which makes him a liar and cheat as well..”
Seems to be eligible. Hasn’t been tossed from any ballots yet. What is everyone waiting for?
This is just like the liberal sinks-into-fantasy diversions the Democrats went through and are going through with the likes of “West Wing,” “Madame Secretary,” “Commander in Chief,” and “Political Animals.”
Things don’t go right in the physical world so they compensate with diversions like this.
My husband and I have given the $5000 allowed. I am a proud Cruz supporter.
(Ducking) let the vile comments begin.
We cut him off last month.
There have been three court challenges to Cruz’s eligibility and unlike Obama he did not get them thrown out on standing. All three are concluded and he won.
You don’t know what you are talking about...
I know a lot more than you do. TECHNICALITIES are what is wrong with out legal system. Lawyers make fortunes twisting our laws to suit the prevailing political agenda. The American people have become too lazy to do any research and always seem to prefer letting others do their thinking for them. CRUZ is not eligible according to the Constitution and neither is Rubio. The Constitution hasn’t changed since the fifties, but the encroachment of socialism and communism into America has changed the political reading of it.
He is a lifetime politician and n be bought. I DO NOT want him on the USSC. He has already shown his traitor colors.
If you want the Cliff notes version, the basic problem is the Founders nor Congress have defined “Natural Born Citizen”. The courts so far have precedent dealing with mainly citizenship problems not qualification for office. This is new territory for them.
In common law there are two definitions for natural born. The first is merely a citizen from birth. The second, more restrictive, is both parents must be citizens and optionally the person in question must be born in the country and/or resided in country for a specified length of time. The courts, to date, have not required the latter as there is no spelled out definition in any USA law.
Ted Cruz does not have the problem of an underage mother at birth like Obama does. Obama also has the other problem of likely being adopted in Indonesia, which does not recognize dual citizenship like Canada does.
I have no problem requiring the more stringent definition, but it is going to require an act of Congress or a Constitutional Amendment to place it in law.
As I said before, Cruz has already won three court challenges on eligibility. Everybody needs drop that one, that dog doesn’t hunt…
Fine blow your money on a loser. He can laugh all the way to Goldman Sachs.
That is exactly why that dog DOES hunt. The correlation between Vattel’s Law of Nations and Natural Born Citizen could not be more clear. Those who refute the wording and prefer to read it as pertains to British Common Law ignore the FACTS of Vattel’s standing with the Framers, the Founders, and the International Law at the time of the Constitutions birth.
It has only been with the intrusion of socialism ...marxism into our country that any consideration has been given to those who are clearly NOT natural born citizens. Our Marxist Educational system has sorely neglected Civics and True, Unrevised American history.
A spelled out definition was not necessary at the time of the framing because the Framers ALL KNEW what natural born citizen meant: A person born of two citizen parents on the native soil. PROGRESSIVES are Attempting now to merge the meaning of Citizen with Natural Born Citizen when they are TWO DIFFERENT things.
It is becoming quite clear that the Founders and Framers were extremely wise to guard against a president with divided loyalties. Cruz is not a defender of America’s SOVEREIGNTY. His votes prove it.
GNTY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.