Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump lists immigration demands that could derail 'Dreamers' deal
The Politico ^ | October 8, 2017 | Seung Min Kim, Josh Dawsey and Ted Hesson

Posted on 10/08/2017 7:04:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

President Donald Trump laid out his immigration principles for Capitol Hill on Sunday — a list of hardline policies that could seriously complicate the prospects of striking a deal with Democrats over the future of hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants.

“The priority for Congress ought to be to save American lives, protect American jobs and improve the well-being of American communities. These reforms accomplish that,” a senior administration official told reporters on Sunday night. “They live up to the president’s campaign commitment to have an immigration system that puts the needs of hardworking Americans first.”

The broad parameters of the immigration wish list have been telegraphed in recent days. But some of the key provisions run counter to an agreement Democratic leaders believed they'd struck with Trump during a White House dinner last month.

On Sunday, Trump called on Congress to build a wall along the southern border — a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, which was premised on tougher immigration policies. But Democratic leaders left the dinner believing that Trump would not demand a border wall in exchange for signing legislation to provide legal status to immigrants who obtained protection from deportation and work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

Trump announced in September that he would wind down the Obama-era immigration executive action starting in March, throwing the onus to Congress to codify DACA into law and launching in earnest an immigration battle in Washington.

The list will certainly turn off Democrats and even Republicans — many of whom have endorsed providing a pathway to legal status for "Dreamers," or undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as minors. The White House said Sunday it was not interested in providing citizenship to DACA beneficiaries, even though the main proposals for Dreamers on Capitol Hill would allow a pathway to citizenship

In a letter to Congress, Trump said these policy priorities “must be included as part of any legislation addressing” DACA because without the changes, “illegal immigration and chain migration, which severely and unfairly burden American workers and taxpayers, will continue without end.”

But on Sunday, administration officials left some space to sign DACA legislation that did not include the entirety of the lengthy list of demands. The senior administration official said “we’re not discussing what’s a veto threat right now” and instead asking lawmakers “to move on [the principles] as expeditiously as possible.”

Two White House officials said the administration sees its immigration principles — which Trump was not deeply involved in writing; they were crafted by domestic policy adviser Stephen Miller — as an opening bid for an eventual DACA deal that may look dramatically different from the demands laid out Sunday evening.

The principles note that Congress passed legislation to erect a fence along the southern border in 2006, but that boundary was never finished — words meant to pressure Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) since he voted for that bill.

The principles also include an overhaul of the asylum system, including tougher penalties for asylum fraud, and speedier deportations for unaccompanied minors who arrive at the border. Current laws allow unaccompanied migrant children from countries other than Canada or Mexico to stay in the United States, usually with a sponsor, until they can get a hearing in immigration court. That process can take years.

The administration is also calling for cutting off key federal grants for sanctuary cities, empowering state and local governments to enforce immigration law and requiring employers to use E-Verify, a workplace verification system that checks whether an employee can work legally in the United States. Such policies that beef up interior enforcement are deal-breakers for Democrats and had been ruled out at Trump’s dinner with Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), according to Democrats.

Trump wants 370 new judges to oversee immigration cases, as well as 1,000 additional attorneys at Immigration and Customs Enforcement and 10,000 more ICE agents to ramp up deportation efforts. Some of these provisions are a boost from what the administration has previously proposed; for instance, Trump's fiscal 2018 budget had called for adding just over 200 people to ICE's prosecution office.

The list also calls for an overhaul of the legal immigration system by allowing U.S. citizens to sponsor only spouses and minor children for permanent residency and creating a points-based merit system for green cards.

The administration also wants lawmakers to end the diversity visa lottery — which doles out visas to immigrants from countries traditionally underrepresented in the United States — and to set the ceiling for refugees “at an appropriate level." The White House plans to limit the number of refugees in fiscal 2018 to just 45,000 — the lowest level since at least 1980.

The changes to the legal immigration system are “so crucial,” U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Lee Francis Cissna said Sunday, because “American workers are getting deeply disadvantaged by the current status quo.”

Pelosi and Schumer said in a joint statement Sunday that the new list of immigration principles went beyond the reasonable border security measures she and Schumer had said they would allow.

“The administration can't be serious about compromise or helping the Dreamers if they begin with a list that is anathema to the Dreamers, to the immigrant community and to the vast majority of Americans," the Democrats said. “The list includes the wall, which was explicitly ruled out of the negotiations. If the president was serious about protecting the Dreamers, his staff has not made a good faith effort to do so.”

Doug Andres, a spokesman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, said House lawmakers would review Trump's principles and continue talking to the administration about legislation. Ryan has convened a working group of influential House Republicans on immigration policy to work on a congressional response to the imminent end of DACA.


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: aliens; borders; daca; dreamers; illegals; immigration; pelosi; ryan; schumer; trump; trumpdaca; trumpdreamers; trumpimmigration

1 posted on 10/08/2017 7:04:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Given that Obola’s EO was unconstitutional if no “Dreamer” deal is reached then we gear up ICE for some busy days (and nights).
2 posted on 10/08/2017 7:06:57 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What’s needed is a 20 year moratorium on ALL immigration. From everywhere.


3 posted on 10/08/2017 7:09:44 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Democratic leaders left the dinner believing that Trump would not demand a border wall in exchange for signing legislation to provide legal status to immigrants who obtained protection from deportation and work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

BS

4 posted on 10/08/2017 7:10:16 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Trump is heading Congress for the vice, going into the 2018 election. Deal with Daca by March, put ‘hard working Americans’ first. Campaign after that. Democrats and most Repubs aren’t prepared for that.


5 posted on 10/08/2017 7:10:28 PM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The administration is also calling for cutting off key federal grants for sanctuary cities, empowering state and local governments to enforce immigration law Does this apply to California as an entire state, or will it target the cities within the state?
6 posted on 10/08/2017 7:13:33 PM PDT by txnativegop (The political left, Mankinds intellectual hemlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gee, that is too bad.


7 posted on 10/08/2017 7:19:01 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

We should all be pleased with our President.
He sure likes to fulfill his campaign promises.


8 posted on 10/08/2017 7:25:38 PM PDT by armourenthusiast (Trumperific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The action being deferred by the illegal executive order of the illegal President to protect illegal aliens from our laws was the deportation of those illegal aliens.
Time is up.

Follow the law.

Remove illegal aliens.

No amnesty.


9 posted on 10/08/2017 7:46:30 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Exactly

Why are we letting millions flood in with amnesty and we ask for
Enforcing the existing law
that is considered a great deal .

It’s Amnesty .

Trump does not want that word outed .

Amnesty no matter how it’s spun .


10 posted on 10/08/2017 7:50:27 PM PDT by ncalburt (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Congress has had plenty-o-time to get its act together.


11 posted on 10/08/2017 7:53:21 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“What’s needed is a 20 year moratorium on ALL immigration. From everywhere.”

Same goes for Welfare, Food Stamps -Snap Cards, UN-Support, etc., Also...Support for NPR, Planned Parenthood, NEA, and any expenditures that were submitted and the receiving people never paid into the system, - and are milking the taxpayers dollars - will be repaid. Also, -all Federal employee’s will be subject to Obama-care policies etc., and all Extravagant expenditures that the Taxpayer has had to foot the bill for over the past 10 years, (by Federal Employees) - will be billed with all interest charges, - to the person that abused the Taxpayers of the USA. That includes Bailouts, LV junkets, and Congress raiding of the Social Security Funds for un-necessary goods and services. These will be compared to Federal per diem daily amounts for all travel, lodging, and food etc., that all regular citizens are required to adhere to.

Nobody rides for free. No - no - no. Illegals will be billed for their financial tax-payer liability, and they will be required to repay their debt to the rightful USA Citizens before being deported to their Country of Origin (at their own expense).

The Gravy Train stops.


12 posted on 10/08/2017 8:03:43 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Placemark.


13 posted on 10/08/2017 8:14:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Agree completely.


14 posted on 10/08/2017 8:18:51 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Plus expelling about 30 million current illegals.

Just imagine all the infrastructure and welfare spending we would save on.


15 posted on 10/08/2017 8:21:20 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
What’s needed is a 20 year moratorium on ALL immigration. From everywhere.

Agreed, though you'd probably want to allow those already in the pipeline.

16 posted on 10/08/2017 8:22:44 PM PDT by libertylover (We EXPECT RESPECT for the flag and anthem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
What’s needed is a 20 year moratorium on ALL immigration. From everywhere.

I've been posting that same thought here for years.

In fact, I think the immigration moratorium should be even longer - say 30 to 40 years, to give recent immigrants enough generational time to fully assimilate.

It's not like we haven't done it before. I've read that, between 1924 and 1965 , there was almost no legal immigration to this country.

17 posted on 10/08/2017 10:55:37 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump putting the toe of his boot near the Congress’ butts and twisting their nipples to do their job and take their medicine. They have kicked this can down the road for so long because they know that either way they go - enforce current law or change the law) they will have sectors of the People more focused in their disapproval of them. For now, Dems and Repubs stand “united” in giving used all the finger and leaning on each other as they prolong the illegal status quo.


18 posted on 10/09/2017 3:33:27 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson