Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pryor Decries Scandal as ''11th-Hour Smear''
KAIT-TV website ^ | November 4 | KAIT

Posted on 11/04/2002 3:57:46 PM PST by fidelio

Posted at: 11:45 p.m. CDT, November 3, 2002 Updated at: 5:00 p.m. CDT, November 4, 2002

JONESBORO, Ark. -- Attorney General Mark Pryor blasted the state Republican Party, claiming the engaged in dirty politics with the release of information that Pryor had hired a Mexican immigrant to perform housekeeping duties.

The controversy began with a report on the the Drudge Report Web site of Internet gossip columnist Matt Drudge. The item said Pryor's campaign ``has been hit with claims he employed an illegal immigrant,'' attributing the information to unnamed sources. The report said the woman ``claims she worked for Pryor as a housekeeper for a year and was paid $7 an hour.''

Pryor is challenging Republican incumbent Tim Hutchinson in a race being closely watched across the country because it could help determine which party will control the Senate.

The Pryor campaign confirmed that Hortencia Osorio, who lives in a mobile home in southwest Little Rock, had been employed by the Attorney General, but denied that she was in the United States illegally.

``When Ortenzia came to us she provided documentation stating she was in the United States legally. She did light housework for us, as needed, for a few hours a week and only for a few months. We have never employed an illegal immigrant,'' the statement said.

Pryor's campaign released an additional statement to supporters in which he declared, "The fact is that two years ago, I hired a legal resident of the United States to work as a housekeeper. I was provided with proof of her legal status at the time I hired her."

The statement continued, "I am very disappointed at how low some people are willing to sink in order to win an election. This kind of attack is beneath the dignity of the people of this state and confirms to voters statewide that Tim Hutchinson will not uphold their trust in such an important office as US Senator."

Early Monday, Pryor's campaign released a notarized affidavit that bore the signature ''Hortencia Osorio.'' She had signed beneath two paragraphs in Spanish, and an English version was provided by the Pryor campaign. It said that when she worked for Pryor she was a legal resident of the United States and provided documentation to the Pryor family that proved her legal status.

In addition to the declaration, Osorio further attested to receiving a phone call from a phone number in DeQueen. Osorio, age 40 from Puebla, Mexico, wrote the statement in Spanish, said that a woman called her and asked her questions about her employment with Pryor. At the end of the conversation, Osorio says that the woman asked for her address so that an "agradecimiento" could be sent. That word can be interpreted as either a thank you, or possibly a gratuity.

When questioned Sunday by The Washington Times, the Pryor campaign would not answer as to whether Pryor paid either Social Security, or income taxes on Osorio's wages. However, while at a campaign stop in Jonesboro, Pryor acknowledged employing Osorio, but said that she did not make enough money to require Pryor to pay withholdings.

"(Orsorio) did not accumulate enough money from us to require us to withold anything," Pryor said.

According to Pryor campaign spokesman Rodell Mollineau, Osorio was employed by Pryor for "about six months, and she worked an average of five hours per week." Mollineau confirmed the pay rate of $7 per hour. Based on calculations, Osorio may have earned upwards of $910 from the Pryor's for housekeeping services. According to the Internal Revenue Service 2001 tax guidelines, a minimum of $1300 paid to a household employee is required before the employer is required to withold employment taxes. In 2000, the threshold is $1,200.

Mollineau acknowledged that Osorio was employed by the Pryor's "toward the end of 2000, and into 2001." He also said that Pryor "was fully aware of the tax laws" during her employment.

The Arkansas Republican Party's Victory 2002 Committee an advertisement titled "Evade" that is scheduled to begin airing that reads:

"He's the top law enforcement officer in Arkansas. It's his job to uphold the law. But now, Attorney General Mark Pryor is avoiding questions... Questions that he allegedly paid an employee in cash, to evade the law requiring that he pay social security and income taxes. Questions that Pryor avoided taxes... the rest of us have to pay. If Mark Pryor doesn't obey the law in his own home, how can he enforce the law as Attorney General?"

The Washington D.C.-based Perkins Coie Law Firm sent a letter to KAIT requesting that it be removed immediately. Cassandra Lentchner, counsel to the Pryor campaign says that the "advertisement contains false and sladerous statements about" Pryor, and claims that the "Republican Party is attempting to put out false and dergatory information."

In Jonesboro on Monday, Hucthinson would not offer any direct comment on the employment issue other than saying that, "(Pryor) can dispel this in a hurry, if he will just provide the documentation that in fact he paid the taxes that the law requires him to do when he has an employee. He should do that before the polls open tomorrow morning."

Despite requests from KAIT, the Pryor campaign has not released any documentation of any kind regarding the employment of Osorio.

TOPICS: Arkansas; Campaign News; Issues; State and Local; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: arkansas; hutchinson; illegal; immigrant; pryor; senate
Vote in the poll located on the page:
1 posted on 11/04/2002 3:57:46 PM PST by fidelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fidelio
Looks to me like Arkansas Pubbies screwed up here. If Ms. Osorio earned less than $1300, Pryor is plainly free and clear. Could be they have evidence to the contrary (i.e. a statement by Ms. Osorio) and Pryor is just squeeling like a stuck 'Rat. But if the Republicans had such a statement, why wouldn't they release that?
Makes it look as though they were just P.D. desperate and started slinging mud. It's dicouraging to think that they might resort to that kind of a 'Rat strategy.
2 posted on 11/04/2002 6:22:58 PM PST by Nevermore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nevermore
Being free on the tax front has absolutely nothing to do with liability for hiring an illegal alien. Pryor is weaseling around with the "proper documentation" excuse. If proper documentation was provided, why doesn't he have a photocopy for his records. This smells, and Pryor is just trying to delay past the election with Clintonesque weasel words.
3 posted on 11/04/2002 7:48:30 PM PST by Young Rhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson