Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban on scientists trying to create three-parent baby
Independent.co.uk ^ | 14 October 2003 | Maxine Frith

Posted on 10/14/2003 4:14:18 PM PDT by Kaslin

Scientists have created the first pregnancy that would have produced babies with three genetic parents.

But after triplets formed in a woman's womb, one foetus was aborted and two later miscarried. Now work on the process, called human nuclear transfer, has been called off after the authorities realised how close scientists in China were to achieving the birth of a three-parent child.

Experts at the Sun Yat-Sen university of medical science in Guangzhou treated a 34-year-old woman who had undergone two IVF cycles, which had failed because of problems with her eggs.

A donor egg was taken and all genetic material removed before the nucleus of the woman's egg was put into the empty one. The researchers succeeded in transferring five of the three-parent embryos into the woman and she became pregnant with triplets. A month into the pregnancy, doctors aborted one foetus to give the remaining two a better chance. But at four and then five months the remaining two were delivered prematurely because of problems and died.

The researchers claim the deaths were related not to the nuclear transfer process but to poor care of the woman during her pregnancy.

The practice had already been outlawed in Britain, amid fears that it could lead to human cloning, in America and in most other countries. China has also implemented a ban, just before its scientists were due to give details of the pregnancy at the annual conference of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, being held this week in Texas.

Scientists working in the field of reproduction say human nuclear transfer could be a breakthrough in treating women with poor-quality eggs, which often result in miscarriages and failed pregnancies. The process involves taking the nucleus - which contains all genetic material - out of an unhealthy egg and inserting it into the egg structure of a donor from which all genetic material has been wiped.

The resulting embryo contains all the genetic make-up of the infertile woman but also mitochondrial DNA from the donor egg. Mitochondrial DNA is in effect the powerhouse of all cells and is common to everyone, but it contains tiny and subtle differences in each individual. Therefore, human nuclear transfer creates an embryo with the genetic make-up of two mothers and a father.

Opponents say scientists are "playing God'' and any child born through the process could suffer severe psychological and physical damage.

American scientists were researching nuclear transfer and had developed the process in mice when in 1998 the US government banned all such studies amid ethical concerns. They then donated their work to researchers in China. In their paper, to be presented to the conference tomorrow, the Chinese conclude: "Viable human pregnancies ... can be achieved through nuclear transfer."

Dr James Grifo, a New York university researcher involved in the original work, criticised the ban. He said: "We would never have made the advances in treating infertility that we have if these bans had been imposed 10 years ago.''

But Alison Cook, of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, which regulates fertility treatment and research in Britain, said: "You are mixing three people's DNA. The law was written to protect the welfare of the embryo and the child."


TOPICS: Extended News; Philosophy; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: bioethics; embryos; genetics; reproduction; scientists
Scientist trying to play God
1 posted on 10/14/2003 4:14:19 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
LOOK! Another Freeper Just Gave To The Cause! WAY TO GO!
We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 10/14/2003 4:16:13 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
James Watson: "If scientists don't play God, who will?"

Very well said, I like this guy.
3 posted on 10/14/2003 4:23:27 PM PDT by Tac12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Wouldn't there be a problem of the Mitochondrial DNA in the mitochondria not matching that of the nucleus? Or is that only a problem in cross species transfers?
4 posted on 10/14/2003 4:26:48 PM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads are traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
As if a ban will stop the sickos. Stay tuned for freak shows we've never seen before.
5 posted on 10/14/2003 4:28:22 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
"Wouldn't there be a problem of the Mitochondrial DNA in the mitochondria not matching that of the nucleus? Or is that only a problem in cross species transfers?"?

Yo, man!

I hate it when that happens.

6 posted on 10/14/2003 5:05:02 PM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Click Here for the RadioFR website!

Tonight on Radio FreeRepublic!

8pm/5pm - Chuck Muth Interviews Lori Waters from the Eagle Forum!

10pm/7pm - Tom Adkins is ON FIRE! If you have never listened to Tom, don't miss his show tonight and watch Tom slice and dice liberals! Tom has been called a cross between Rush Limbaugh and Mike Savage and his shows are always intertaining and informative!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep! HIFI broadband feed HERE! (when available)

Would you like to receive a note when RadioFR is on the air? Send an email to radiofreerepublic-subscribe@radioactive.kicks-ass.net!

Click HERE to chat in the RadioFR chat room!


7 posted on 10/14/2003 5:05:19 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Scientist trying to play God" you got it - in Communist China of all places! Last I heard it was still ONE child per married couple. The government prefers abortions over there so mucking about like this is peculiar to say the least.
8 posted on 10/14/2003 7:17:24 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson