You are missing the entire point.
This woman was not being kept alive by extraordinary means.
She was/is NOT in a coma.
She was/is NOT terminal.
She is being slowly starved to death by removal of a feeding tube.
You are missing the entire point.
This woman was not being kept alive by extraordinary means.
She was/is NOT in a coma.
She was/is NOT terminal.
She is being slowly starved to death by removal of a feeding tube. I am not missing the point, you are.
If the woman cannot speak coherently for herself, then her husband has that right.
If you don't like the law, work to change it, but don't bitch about it being fairly enforced.
And it is being fairly enforced.
So9