Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carlton chief, sergeant face firearms charges (BATF now persecuting local police)
News-Register (McMinnville, OR) ^ | February 22, 2003 | STARLA POINTER

Posted on 10/19/2003 12:41:47 AM PDT by fire_eye

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Leisler
Yeah, and I met them all in the Airborne Infantry.

So, in effect, you see no need to restrict anyone from owning anything and furthermore, from probably doing anything.

Are you a Libertarian by chance?

41 posted on 10/19/2003 1:58:15 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
"So, in effect, you see no need...(Absolute assumption # 1)...

to restrict anyone(Absolute # 2)...

from owning anything( # 3)...

and furthermore, from probably doing anything( # 4)

Allow six to eight weeks to receive prize. Prizes may not be exactly as shown. Prizes may be exchanged with one of equal or greater value. One prize per contestant.

42 posted on 10/19/2003 2:52:48 PM PDT by Leisler (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rogator
I stand corrected. Glad to see some LEO's maintaining modesty and decorum.
43 posted on 10/19/2003 2:56:53 PM PDT by Leisler (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: archy
If so, is this payback?

It could be that the cops in question annoyed some fed. A small-town police-chief or sheriff might feel no need to bend his knee to the feds and their "requests". This might be a message to all small town LEO's

44 posted on 10/19/2003 3:09:42 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Comus
I always wonder how the BATF chooses its targets. Violent gangs with nation-wide theatres of operation get no attention from the baby killers, while rural loners and gun tinkerers are hunted down and killed or sent to prison. It's almost like they want...............

A BATF raid on a Crips HQ in South Central LA would trigger a firefight and start a riot. The probability of any raider getting out alive would be low.

BATF want arrest stats with minimum personal risk

45 posted on 10/19/2003 3:12:31 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
"Have you ever, in your life met SOMEONE you thought should not own such weapons either because they were: a) not mature enough. ... b) incapable of handling said weapon ... c) mentally incapacitated beyond the point where they could be trusted to control their 'fire' (... d) deemed to be a risk because of their 'criminal bent'"

Yes, some examples of such creatures do indeed come to mind....



46 posted on 10/19/2003 4:46:57 PM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
If so, is this payback?

It could be that the cops in question annoyed some fed. A small-town police-chief or sheriff might feel no need to bend his knee to the feds and their "requests". This might be a message to all small town LEO's

Turn about is fair play.

-archy-/-

47 posted on 10/19/2003 4:47:49 PM PDT by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
I have owned guns my entire life from 10 years old to the present but there have to be some limits to firepower and accessories citizens can possess.

I'm sure the British authorities around the time of the Revolution felt exactly the same way.

48 posted on 10/19/2003 5:45:07 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
We're about to colonize? Would we have known The British are coming if their muskets were silencer equipped?
49 posted on 10/19/2003 6:05:46 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: misanthrope
Is is easy sounds like they are simi auto's built on machine gun recivers. By BATF standards they are still full auto's. Lets say you take a m16 put ar15 parts in it to make it simi BATF still says it is a full auto. Under their thinking once a machine gun always a machine gun.

Is it right no but no one in congress wants to set them right nor pull any funding when they stomp cats to death and kill people over unpaided tax's.

50 posted on 10/19/2003 7:16:22 PM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
dwilli said: "Would we have known The British are coming if their muskets were silencer equipped?"

The alarm that went out was "the Regulars are coming". Meaning the regular army. It was the colonists own army which was being used to confiscate civilian arms. Citizens of Boston were forced to disobey the order to turn in their weapons and had to smuggle them out of the occupied city in order to keep them.

It was not the firing of the regular's guns which raised the alarm, but several mounted riders including Paul Revere.

You can bet if our army is ever instructed to confiscate the arms of civilians, the army will have every weapon known to man at their service. You and I may not have silencers, machine guns, helicopters, or anti-tank missiles, but the forces sent to tyrannize us will have all this and much more.

51 posted on 10/19/2003 7:16:38 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye
We're banking on the truth here."

This is the BATFE here. They don't have much use for the truth, nor much aquaintence with it either. I'm not sure they'd know what it was if it bit them in the a$$.

52 posted on 10/19/2003 8:57:47 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
There is a very good reason silencer possession is a federal crime.

And that would be?

53 posted on 10/19/2003 8:58:49 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
not mature enough. IOW, they couldn't be trusted to exercise proper 'fire control.

Like the BATFags at Waco?

incapable of handling said weapon

Like many women police officers?

mentally incapacitated beyond the point where they could be trusted to control their 'fire' (mentally incompetent - can't judge proper from improper use of weaponry that can potentially kill)

See Waco again.

d) deemed to be a risk because of their 'criminal bent'"

Like the SOB who murdered a woman carrying a child in her arms at Ruby Rudge.

Yeah, I guess there are some folks who shouldn't have guns.

54 posted on 10/19/2003 9:02:20 PM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
You can bet if our army is ever instructed to confiscate the arms of civilians, the army will have every weapon known to man at their service.

Many, if not most, in the American military take their oath to defend the Constitution seriously. I'd also bet that the higher the 'skill' level of the soldier, the more likely they are to support the Constitution and refuse to obey any illegal edicts to violate the Bill of Rights.

You and I may not have silencers, machine guns, helicopters, or anti-tank missiles

Should such an illegal edict come down the pipe, I would guess that a lot of these items would either mysteriously disappear, or suddenly have "reliability" problems.

There are still quite a few Patriots in the American military.

55 posted on 10/19/2003 9:07:29 PM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
There is a very good reason silencer possession is a federal crime.

No, it's not a federal crime, so long as you have the proper paperwork filled out and you've paid your tax.

The only reason they passed that edict was to raise revenue for the state. It needs to be repealed, as the 2nd amendment doesn't give the government the power to regulate silencers.

56 posted on 10/19/2003 9:10:19 PM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
Is it right no but no one in congress wants to set them right nor pull any funding when they stomp cats to death and kill people over unpaided tax's.

There were a lot of Republicans (as well as a few democrats) that talked about pulling their funding in 1994 after they won Congress, but the Bush/Dole wing of the party stopped that.

57 posted on 10/19/2003 9:11:44 PM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
Which is exactly why the right is "not" to be infringed.
Just like the british would want any adversary disarmed so does any federal gov want any possible future adversary unarmed.
The 2d ammendment keeps this most crucial right and power in the hands of the people off limits to the gov.
If even a small percent of military follows any order to disarm American citizens it would be too late to acquire what we need.
58 posted on 10/19/2003 9:31:27 PM PDT by chuckwalla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: chuckwalla
If even a small percent of military follows any order to disarm American citizens it would be too late to acquire what we need.

If that day ever comes, a decent bolt action rifle equipped with a scope is all many Patriots will "need".

59 posted on 10/19/2003 9:36:35 PM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
You sure about that???????
I prefer a choice.
60 posted on 10/19/2003 9:43:26 PM PDT by chuckwalla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson