Atheist Never Married "Pledge Of Allegiance" Daughter's Mother, Case Should Be Dismissed

BushCountry.org ^ | 10/21/22 | Rev. Austin Miles

[Greenpees]

If I were Newdow, I'd repent. This man will go down as the devil incarnate..

But then, maybe he is.

[CobaltBlue]

From a legal standpoint, it's far too late to raise the issue of whether the father has standing. This should have been raised in the trial court.

[elbucko]

Michael Newdow is a "Red Diaper Baby" from a long line of Red Diaper Babies. The descendants of Eastern Europeans that immigrated to the U.S. before the Bolshevik, Russian revolution in 1917. Most of them came from Russia to America from 1900 until 1918. They missed out on the communist revolution in Russia and tried to encourage one in the USA for 70 years. Since the economic theory of Marxism has been discredited, the only ideology left for them to cling to is atheism. Newdow is on a "Jihad" for no God at all.

[Izzy Dunne]

the words "unde rGod," inserted by Congress in 1954

You know, I'm not that fond of those particular words, myself.

[Donaeus]

Wouldn't it be sweet justice to see him found guilty of perjury and disbarred? I'm not holding my breath for it to happen but I will certainly enjoy the scenario mentally.

Round trip tickets to CA: $1500
Hotel Accomodations: $250/night
Small coffee and NewsMax Magazine: $37.95
Seeing Newdow's face live when he's disbarred: Priceless

[CyberAnt]

Well .. you may be right, but I hope the USSC throws it out.

[BADROTOFINGER]

Is Newdow an attorney? I thought he was a doctor who just refuses to work for a living...JFK

[cookcounty]

"The daughter is against the lawsuit her non-custodial father filed and she has repeatedly stated her opinion many times".

"Let SCOTUS put this to rest, once and hopefully, for all time.

This is not a trivial issue. If the court allows it to go forward, it opens the door to others filing suits "on behalf of " your child without your permission!

[cookcounty]

" I hope the USSC throws the guy and his lawsuit out the door.

But not without publicly chastising the 9th Circuit for ineptitude. Is this something that came to light since the 9th conjured up its incantation?

[usadave]

In her first public comment since the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with Newdow that the words "unde rGod," inserted by Congress in 1954, make the pledge an unconstitutional endorsement of religion,

The U.S. Constitution doesn't forbid an endorsement of religion - it forbids an establishment of religion.

[Ready4Freddy]

"If the court allows it to go forward, it opens the door to others filing suits "on behalf of " your child without your permission!"

Why did Lazaro Gonzalez come to mind when I read this?

[cookcounty]

"You know, I'm not that fond of those particular words, myself."

How about something more Jeffersonian, something from the Spirit of 1776, like,

"Under Our Creator""

[CindyDawg]

I've got a better idea. Let's just leave it like it is :')

[Az Joe]

He's her father so being married to the mother means exactly nothing.

[Elliott Jackalope]

If lawyers were disbarred for perjury, about %99 of all lawyers would be out looking for new jobs tomorrow. Not that I'm complaining, mind you, but c'mon, let's get real here. Ain't gonna happen. Our courts are playgrounds of evil. Boot camps for the followers of the eternal forces of chaos and lies. Training camps for the denizens of darkness.

Truth in advertising would mean that the entrance to all courtrooms would have the words "Abandon all hope, ye who enter here" carved over them.

[TheAngryClam]

Is it possible she is a "common law" wife?

Nope- California abolished common law marriage roughly a century ago, and thus does not recognize it as any arrangement producing right or obligations.

[deannadurbin]

>>Thanks for posting this -- wonder why this wasn't brought out before -- sounds like someone has been doing some digging! What a lowlife that guy is!

Is Newdow in bed with Michael Schiavo and George Felos? :)

[TheAngryClam]

Yes, Michael Newdow is an attorney. He was admitted to the bar on July 29, 2002 after earning a law degree from the University of Michigan, too.

Public records are wonderful.

Just randomly, here's two more fun ones: Attorney General Bill Lockyer and Shawn Steel, former state GOP chair. Pick your favourite attorney today!

[rolling_stone]

Another Clintoon legacy, lying to the court...for personal gain...

[Flashlight]

...Courts can only hear cases in which there is an injured party, and if there is no injury there is no grounds for a case...

True enough, but...

1. Newdow has standing as a parent to challenge a practice that interferes with his right to direct the reiligious education of his daughter. Doe v. Madison, 1999 and others.

2. The case is Michael Newdow vs. U.S. Congress, not Newdow's daughter vs. U.S. Congress.

The fact that his daughter and his daughter's mother claim no injury does not mean that Newdow cannot claim injury to his daughter.

Newdow claims his daughter was "injured" simply by being exposed to the pledge in a state-run school. He doesn't claim that his daughter doesn't want to say the pledge.

To illustrate, let's say that the school was teaching sex education in the elementary school, and that Newdow's daughter and his daughter's mother both had no problem with that. Newdow could still claim that the sex education "injured" his daughter. He has the right to say that in his opinion, his daughter is being injured.

The issues of standing and injury have all been addressed. Newdow absolutely has the right to file this lawsuit.

When someone says "the daughter's not complaining" therefore Newdow lied when he says his daughter was "injured" don't understand that, in Newdow's opinion, his daughter is "injured" whether she says so or not, therefore he did not lie.

you can read the facts of the case here:
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/conlaw/newdowus62602opn.pdf